|
‘Globalisation has obliterated distance, not just physically but also, most dangerously, mentally. It creates the illusion of intimacy when, in fact, the mental distances have changed little. It has concertinaed the world without engendering the necessary respect, recognition and tolerance that must accompany it.’ (Martin Jacques) At a Chinese New Year celebration meal last week, I looked around the dinner table at my family: my brother who lived in Brunei, his Malaysian wife, my sister who lived in Germany, her husband who travels the world with work, my niece who lived in Spain, my nephew who also lived in Spain and my Mum who has visited more countries than she can remember. My daughters are internationally-minded too: one taught herself Japanese and the other recently visited Austria. It struck me how much the world has changed in my own lifetime. The ability to communicate and build relationships with people all over the world has never been easier, thanks to advances in technology. International travel has never been easier too, at least for those who have the financial resources and visa permits to do it. Given these opportunities to rub shoulders with our global neighbours, we might expect a ‘one world’ outlook increasingly to predominate. Yet, take a cursory glance across current news headlines and we see an increasingly polarised world, divided along national, political and ideological lines. We see a profound fracturing in the breakdown of the rules-based international order with nationalism on the rise, and within nations where different -isms or -phobias tear at each other in heated culture wars. Perhaps global idealists forgot a deep human desire for distinctive identity, belonging, security – and power?
11 Comments
Liam Baker
24/2/2026 06:38:20 pm
So true! My friends across Europe and Asia are just faces on a screen sometimes. We talk daily but still feel worlds apart. Technology is amazing but it’s not a cure for human ego or tribalism. Globalization = proximity, not intimacy.
Reply
Fiona Elhag
24/2/2026 06:40:54 pm
You rightly highlight the paradox of globalization, in that physical proximity has decreased yet psychological distance remains stubbornly intact. Technological advances and affordable international travel have indeed expanded our ability to communicate across borders but these tools alone cannot cultivate understanding. True intercultural empathy requires deliberate effort, active listening and, above all, humility. Without such engagement, “concertinaed” connections risk creating superficial relationships and masking deep-seated ignorance or prejudice. Moreover, your blog subtly gestures toward socioeconomic privilege, that access to global mobility and digital connectivity is unevenly distributed and often reinforces existing hierarchies rather than dissolving them. A family with members spread across continents, while illustrative, represents an atypical experience. Millions remain physically and mentally isolated, often constrained by political, economic or technological barriers. Therefore, while the vision of a cosmopolitan, borderless society is appealing, the reality is more fragmented. Globalization has not merely obliterated distance. It has also magnified inequalities and highlighted human tendencies toward in-group cohesion, nationalism and and identity preservation. To advance toward a truly interconnected world, we must pair technological and logistical progress with education, cross-cultural dialogue and and structural reforms that bridge the experiential gaps between global citizens.
Reply
Jake Summers
24/2/2026 06:42:23 pm
🌏✈️ We’re close to everyone online, but do we really know them? My cousins live in 3 countries and video calls still feel hollow. Globalization isn’t magic. It’s a tool but only humans make it meaningful. #MindTheDistance #GlobalButLonely
Reply
Anika Mehta PhD
24/2/2026 06:44:04 pm
Hi Nick, Jacques’ assertion is true. Globalization has compressed our world physically yet mental distances persist. Superficial connectivity does not equate to understanding. While international travel and digital communication offer exposure, they cannot replace deliberate engagement with cultural complexity. The illusion of closeness risks complacency, reinforcing cognitive biases and identity-driven divides rather than fostering the empathy and tolerance a truly interconnected world demands.
Reply
Nina Patel
24/2/2026 06:44:45 pm
Love this take. 🌍 We’re connected 24/7 but empathy lags behind. Just because I can DM someone in Japan doesn’t mean I understand their world.
Reply
Dr Sophia Jansen
24/2/2026 06:48:08 pm
I find this reflection both accurate and sobering, Nick. While your family anecdote portrays a world of mobility and cultural exposure, it masks the broader structural and psychological realities Jacques warns about. Physical proximity and connectivity are indeed easier than ever, but human cognition and social behavior evolve far more slowly. We crave belonging, identity, and validation and these needs are not automatically mitigated by global exposure. In fact, rapid cross-cultural encounters without context or preparation can reinforce stereotypes, as individuals retreat into familiar patterns of thought when confronted with difference.
Reply
Zara Fields
24/2/2026 06:49:39 pm
When you’re “in touch with everyone globally” but can’t even understand your neighbour’s slang… 😂
Reply
Jayden
24/2/2026 06:50:16 pm
World: smaller. Minds: same size. 😬
Reply
Dr Vani Vaish
24/2/2026 06:54:15 pm
Hi Nick. Thank you for sharing these interesting reflections. The observation that globalization has “obliterated distance” physically but not mentally is compelling. While technological tools and international mobility create the impression of closeness, they do not automatically foster intercultural understanding or tolerance. Many people worldwide experience limited exposure to other cultures, constraining their capacity for empathy.
Reply
Omar Khalid
24/2/2026 06:56:46 pm
Reading this made me think about my own experiences traveling and meeting people from different countries. Every conversation and every shared meal abroad feels like the world shrinking in the best way. Sure, mental distance can still exist but the opportunities for understanding and friendship are enormous.
Reply
Lena Fischer
24/2/2026 06:57:49 pm
Hey Nick. I’ve never thought of globalization quite like that before, but I also see the positive side. Being able to connect with people in different countries and learning languages, sharing ideas or even just video chatting feels like a gift.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Nick WrightI'm a psychological coach, trainer and OD consultant. Curious to discover how can I help you? Get in touch! Like what you read? Simply enter your email address below to receive regular blog updates!
|
RSS Feed