'A physicist friend of mine once said that in facing death, he drew some consolation from the reflection that he would never again have to look up the word ‘hermeneutics’ in the dictionary.’ (Steven Weinberg) I’m reading Henri Nouwen’s deeply introspective, honest and inspiring book, ‘The Return of the Prodigal Son’. At the start, the writer reflects on the relationship between Jesus’ original narrating of the parable in one time and context; the artist Rembrandt’s depiction of that account in a painting in a different time and context; and his own reflections of both, each in light of the other, in yet another time and context. As I'm reading the book here and now, I find myself in the centre of that hermeneutical triangle, in the midst of my own life and context too. This notion of hermeneutics, the art of interpretation and how we place ourselves in relation to an experience or a narrative, is important in psychological coaching because the ways in which clients construe and interpret their experiences shape their emotions, behaviours and decision-making. Social psychology provides some hermeneutical principles – attribution theory, perspective-taking and social constructivism – that I find useful to help clients shift their thinking patterns and develop a greater sense of awareness, understanding and agency. Attribution theory examines how people explain life events: whether they see a cause in themselves or in external circumstances. A balanced approach acknowledges both personal factors and external influences. A client who failed a job interview may say, ‘I didn’t get the job because I’m just not good enough.’ A coach could reframe this by asking: ‘What feedback (if any) have you received from the employer, and how do you interpret it?’, or ‘Apart from your own performance, what broader factors might have influenced the panel's decision?’ Perspective-taking is the ability to step into another person’s shoes and to view a situation from their standpoint. This skill is vital in coaching because clients often become stuck in a rigid, self-focused interpretation of events. Suppose a client is frustrated because their boss gave them critical feedback. They feel attacked and believe their boss doesn’t appreciate their hard work. A coach could ask: ’What assumptions might you be making about your boss’s intentions?’, or ‘If a colleague were to receive similar feedback, how might they interpret it?’ Social constructivism suggests that many of our beliefs about identity, self-worth and success are shaped by societal norms and cultural messages. Coaching can help clients recognise and challenge these inherited beliefs. Example: A client struggling with work-life balance may say, ‘I feel guilty if I’m not busy all the time.’ A coach could ask: ‘What messages did you receive when growing up about the value of hard work and being busy?’, or ’How do the expectations in your work environment reinforce or challenge your current beliefs around 'busyness'?’
16 Comments
Zebediah Vance
13/3/2025 03:21:55 pm
This is spot-on, Nick. In executive coaching, I use perspective-shifting exercises all the time. Leaders who can step outside their own viewpoint make better decisions, retain top talent and handle conflict more effectively. I particularly liked your application of attribution theory, getting clients to recognize external vs. internal factors is huge for leadership development. Too many professionals assume setbacks are a reflection of personal failure rather than a natural part of growth. I’d be interested in hearing more about how you apply social constructivism in coaching. Challenging deep-seated cultural beliefs in a corporate setting is tricky. Some execs resist the idea that their work ethic isn’t just personal drive but also social conditioning. Have you found effective ways to introduce this concept to high-level professionals? Would love to discuss further.
Reply
Nick Wright
13/3/2025 08:43:19 pm
Thank you, Zebediah. The first time I came across attribution theory in a coaching context was when I saw it used to help a person identify contributors to success. It involved enabling the client to reflect on a professional success story, then to consider what was attributable to their own performance, and what to broader circumstantial factors.
Reply
Boaz Nyström
13/3/2025 03:23:04 pm
Hey Nick. Henri Nouwen’s words… always a balm. This post? A reminder that how we see, how we frame, changes everything. Coaching, faith, life, all a process of seeing anew. Thank you.
Reply
Nick Wright
13/3/2025 08:45:38 pm
Thanks Boaz. Yes, I always find Henri Nouwen's writings deeply honest, moving and inspiring. On reframing, this short related piece may be of interest? https://www.nick-wright.com/blog/whats-really-going-on-here
Reply
Marisella Okonkwo
13/3/2025 03:24:45 pm
This is an interesting discussion, but I think we need to be careful with how we apply these psychological tools. Sure, perspective-taking and reframing can be useful no doubt. But sometimes, telling people to reinterpret their struggles puts too much responsibility on the individual and not enough on the system. For example, a woman who is constantly interrupted in meetings might feel frustrated. Coaching might encourage her to ask, “How can I reframe this experience?” But the real question is: Why do men keep interrupting her? A job rejection might feel personal but structural discrimination exists. And this whole idea that busyness equals worth? That’s capitalism talking.
Reply
Nick Wright
13/3/2025 08:58:47 pm
Hi Marisella. Thank you for such a helpful challenge and invaluable balancing perspective. Yes, I agree there's a risk that we could attribute whatever challenges a person is facing to the way they are perceiving or construing it. In face, we could consider that itself as an example a fundamental attribution error (https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/fundamental-attribution-error). On the broader issue of critical reflection, including on systemic factors, this short related piece may be of interest: https://www.nick-wright.com/blog/critical-reflection
Reply
Elodie Finch
13/3/2025 03:27:19 pm
I just love this Nick! Your insights about perspective-taking and how we shape our own interpretations are so important. I see this all the time in my work with people who are struggling to move forward. A single event, a job rejection or a critical comment can feel like a definitive judgment on their worth when really, it’s just one moment in time and one interpretation among many.
Reply
Nick Wright
13/3/2025 09:00:05 pm
Thank you for such encouraging feedback, Elodie. Yes, that has certainly often been true in my own coaching experience too.
Reply
Jareth Mullins
13/3/2025 03:28:40 pm
Nick, I get it. Reframing things is useful, sure. But sometimes people aren’t stuck in a narrative. They’re just dealing with reality. If your boss is an ass, maybe the problem is the boss. If a job interview goes south, maybe the interviewer just had a bad day. Overanalyzing can be a trap too. Sometimes the best advice is: accept it, move on and do better next time. No need for all the fancy terminology.
Reply
Nick Wright
13/3/2025 09:02:55 pm
Hi Jareth. That's a fair challenge. On the question of sense-making (without the fancy terminology!), this short related piece may be of interest? https://www.nick-wright.com/what-is-really-going-on-here.html
Reply
Oswald Tremayne
13/3/2025 03:30:55 pm
Fascinating. This hermeneutical triangle you describe - Nouwen reflecting on Rembrandt reflecting on Christ with you reflecting on them all - is a perfect illustration of how meaning is never fixed. Interpretation is a conversation across time, shaped by our circumstances and prior understandings. Reminds me of Ricoeur’s concept of the second naïveté, how we first accept a story, then deconstruct it, then return to it with deeper wisdom. Coaching, like life, is about navigating this cycle. Helping others shift their interpretive lens is not just psychology. I’s philosophy in practice. Thank you, Nick.
Reply
Nick Wright
13/3/2025 09:09:24 pm
Thank you, Oswald. I'd never heard of second naïveté before so I had a glance online and found this fascinating article about it: file:///C:/Users/info/Downloads/admin,+Errs.Buzasi.2022.13.2%20(1).pdf Thank you for sharing it!
Reply
Lysander Quill
13/3/2025 03:32:58 pm
Three men see the son return.
Reply
Nick Wright
13/3/2025 09:10:56 pm
Thank you, Lysander. You definitely have a way of evoking and provoking deeper reflection.
Reply
Pamela Armstrong
13/3/2025 09:18:52 pm
Love this viewpoint, Nick
Reply
Nick Wright
13/3/2025 09:19:47 pm
Hi Pamela. Thanks for your encouraging feedback.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Nick WrightI'm a psychological coach, trainer and OD consultant. Curious to discover how can I help you? Get in touch! Like what you read? Simply enter your email address below to receive regular blog updates!
|