|
‘Do you have the patience to wait until your mud settles and the water is clear? Can you remain unmoving until the right direction arises by itself?’ (Lao Tzu) 'What do we do when a good question creates more anxiety or uncertainty, rather than less?' I was marking assignments this week for participants on an advanced Action Learning facilitator training programme, leading to Institute of Leadership & Management recognition for those who successfully complete it. One participant quoted Lao Tzu’s words (above) as a profound reflection on the value of reflection in Action Learning. We often associate the ‘Action’ in Action Learning with what happens after the session: the action someone decides to take as a result of the conversation. But what if action is also what happens during the session? For example, when a peer asks a question that challenges an assumption, opens up a new perspective or invites someone to notice something different in their thinking, feeling or behaviour. A question can be a form of action. I sometimes think of such questions as like pebbles thrown into a pond. They disturb the surface and create a splash. The ripples spread and, for a moment, it can be difficult to see clearly. A carefully chosen question can unsettle something that previously seemed certain. It can bring thoughts, feelings, assumptions or possibilities into awareness that weren't felt or visible before. And this is where the Action Learning set’s response becomes important. Do we immediately throw in another pebble? Or can we wait? Silence can feel uncomfortable and we may be tempted to fill it. We may ask another question, offer an observation, provide an interpretation or try to help the person reach a conclusion. But perhaps, sometimes, the most helpful thing we can do is…nothing…and hold the space for something to emerge. If we allow the water to settle, a person may begin to see a reflection on the surface, or may notice what is hidden beneath it, or begin to see something that wasn't there, or wasn't visible, before. Perhaps that is where the ‘Learning’ in Action Learning happens. Not necessarily in the question itself. Not necessarily in the answer. But in the space between the two. Of course, this isn't always easy. When something has been stirred up inside us, our own perception and judgement can become clouded. We can feel a strong urge to resolve the uncertainty, regain our bearings and do something. And yet Lao Tzu's question offers a different possibility: Can we remain unmoving until the right direction arises by itself? For an Action Learning facilitator and peers, this may require patience, confidence and a willingness to resist the temptation to intervene. It may mean trusting the process. It may mean trusting the person. It may mean trusting God. It may mean trusting ourselves enough to tolerate not-knowing what will happen next. I don't think this means that we should always wait for perfect clarity before taking action. Sometimes it’s action itself that generates learning. But neither should we assume that movement is always progress. I’m reminded of these words by Ernesto Cardenal: ‘We are mirrors of God, created to reflect Him. Even when the water is not calm, it still reflects the sky.’ We don't need the water to be perfectly still before a revelation is possible. So, in Action Learning, perhaps the question isn't only, ‘What question should I ask next?’ but: ‘What might become visible if I have the patience – and trust – not to ask it?’
11 Comments
Sarah Williams
18/9/2026 01:04:00 pm
Great blog, Nick.
Reply
John Murphy
18/9/2026 01:04:59 pm
Sometimes I ask another question because I'm uncomfortable with the silence.
Reply
Peter Novak
18/9/2026 01:06:12 pm
I agree with the general argument, although I would be careful about making “waiting” too attractive as a facilitation principle. In some situations, silence gives the participant useful thinking space. In other situations, it can increase anxiety, especially where the person already feels uncertain or exposed. The metaphor of muddy water is useful because it shows that disturbance is not necessarily negative. However, water does not always become clear simply because we stop moving. Sometimes we need to change the container, add information, or look from another position. For me, the important issue is not whether the facilitator asks another question or remains silent. The important issue is whether the intervention supports learning. Sometimes the most courageous action is waiting. Sometimes the most courageous action is asking the uncomfortable second question. Good facilitation requires judgement about these moments, without pretending we can always know in advance.
Reply
Mark Evans
18/9/2026 01:07:12 pm
We are often too quick to throw another pebble. Sometimes the pond just needs us to leave it alone!
Reply
David Lee
18/9/2026 01:08:14 pm
In my experience, silence has different meaning depending on culture and personality. Some participants need more time because they are translating thoughts, not only language. A facilitator can easily mistake this pause for lack of engagement. So I agree with the invitation to wait, but I would add: wait with attention, not simply wait. Observe what is happening and let the participant decide the pace where possible.
Reply
Jim Brown
18/9/2026 01:10:22 pm
This reminds me of my first years as a team leader. I was always trying to solve things very fast. If somebody brought me a problem, I thought my job was to have a good answer. Later I understood that sometimes my answer was stopping the other person from thinking. It is funny because when we are helping, we really believe we are helping. We don't notice how much we are controlling the conversation.
Reply
Maria Garcia
18/9/2026 01:12:10 pm
Hi Nick. I found your article interesting because it challenges the common obsession with “next steps”. In many leadership programmes, every discussion must end with an action plan. We feel uncomfortable if somebody leaves without a clear answer. But I wonder if we sometimes turn reflection into another productivity exercise. There are situations where a person genuinely needs to sit with a question for a while. They don't need a SMART objective. They don't need another framework. They need enough psychological and conversational space to discover what they actually think. At the same time, I would be cautious with the spiritual language around trusting God or waiting for the right direction to arise. This may be deeply meaningful for some people, but not for everyone. In a diverse learning group, facilitators need to leave room for different interpretations of where insight comes from. The strongest part of the metaphor for me is therefore not the religious dimension but the recognition that uncertainty itself can have value. We don't always learn by becoming more certain. Sometimes we learn by discovering that our previous certainty was too simple.
Reply
Ahmed Khan
18/9/2026 01:14:20 pm
Nick, I have mixed feeling about this idea. Yes, waiting is important but in real organisations people don't always have luxury of waiting. A manager comes with a problem and there is pressure from customers, colleagues, money, deadlines. If we say “let the water become clear” all the time, maybe nothing gets decided.
Reply
Tom WIlson
18/9/2026 01:15:45 pm
Sometimes the most powerful question is followed by… absolutely nothing. And yes, that silence can feel VERY long! 😂
Reply
Rachel Cohen
18/9/2026 01:17:24 pm
Interesting. There is an important distinction here between productive uncertainty and unproductive uncertainty. I think Action Learning needs both courage and care around this distinction.
Reply
Lucy Walker
18/9/2026 01:18:14 pm
Less pebble throwing. More pond watching. I like it. 🌊
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Nick WrightI'm a psychological coach, trainer and OD consultant. Curious to discover how can I help you? Get in touch! Like what you read? Simply enter your email address below to receive regular blog updates!
|
RSS Feed