‘Hope reflects a psychological state in which we perceive the way-power and the willpower to get to our destination.’ (Charles Snyder) I’ve spent much of the past 18 years working with leaders in beyond-profit organisations, enabling them to lead and influence transitions in the midst of dynamically-complex change. This often involves helping them to develop the qualities and relationships they need to support themselves and others to survive, thrive and perform well in the face of an uncertain and, at times, anxiety-provoking future. A recurring challenge that such leaders encounter is how to instil and sustain hope within themselves as well as within and between others. Putting on a brave face my inspire confidence in the short-term but can feel inauthentic if their foundations are wobbling – and authenticity is a critical condition for building and sustaining trust. New leadership calls for resilience, resourcefulness and faith. Hope Theory offers some useful insights and ideas here. If we (a) have a desired future in mind (vision), (b) can see a way by which it can be achieved (way-power) and (c) are motivated to take action to do it (willpower), we are more likely to experience genuine hope. It’s very different to abstract idealism or naïve optimism, which may engender a good feeling but lack any grounding in reality. Yet what to do if someone is stuck: devoid of vision, unable to see a way forward or lacking in any sense of agency to do anything about it? This is where co-active leadership, coaching and action learning can really help; offering practical means by which people and groups can discover or create fresh goals, find or devise innovative solutions, and gain the traction they need to move things forward. Do you need help with hope? Get in touch!
14 Comments
Eric Ward
17/12/2024 01:49:45 pm
Hi Nick. Hope is indeed a fascinating concept, and this blog does a commendable job of dissecting its psychological and practical dimensions. But I’m struck by how intertwined hope is with the notion of control. Vision, way-power, and willpower all imply a certain degree of agency, yet in dynamically-complex systems, control is often elusive.
Reply
Nick Wright
17/12/2024 07:06:01 pm
Thank you, Eric. I love your insights around the interplay between control. uncertainty, existential dimensions and hope. I agree that surrendering to the unknown - as if sitting with the potential discomfort of not-knowing rather than struggling to resolve it - can sometimes 'create the emotional space needed for creativity and resilience to flourish.' I really like your idea, too, of a dual approach to leadership to 'navigate the tension between action and acceptance.'
Reply
Rod Pickett
17/12/2024 01:53:22 pm
Hope, huh? Sounds nice – but when my "willpower" dies after one Zoom meeting and my "way-power" gets lost halfway through a to-do list, I’m not feeling it. Maybe leadership isn't about always having hope but learning to keep moving even when the hope tank’s running low. Just a thought!
Reply
Nick Wright
17/12/2024 07:08:22 pm
Hi Rod. I can relate to those experiences and feelings! 'When the hope tank's running low'...I'm trying to learn to take a pit stop (https://www.nick-wright.com/blog/pit-stop).
Reply
Heidi Cole
17/12/2024 01:55:37 pm
Hey Nick. I appreciate your critique of naïve optimism. Real hope isn’t pretending things are okay when they’re not. It’s about facing reality head-on, while still daring to imagine something better. That balance is incredibly hard but so necessary. Thanks for sharing this as we approach a new year!
Reply
Nick Wright
17/12/2024 07:10:40 pm
Thank you, Heidi. You expressed that beautifully: 'It's about facing reality head-on, while still daring to imagine something better'. It resonates well too with the Stockdale Paradox (https://www.nick-wright.com/blog/stockdale-paradox)
Reply
Vicki Dance
17/12/2024 02:00:28 pm
Hey Nick. I like how you keep it real about hope. It’s not about being super positive all the time but about figuring out what’s possible and actually working toward it. I’ve seen leaders try to fake confidence and it never works. People can tell when it’s not genuine.
Reply
Nick Wright
17/12/2024 07:13:13 pm
Thank you, Vicki. Yes indeed - co-active essentially means doing-with rather than, say, doing-to. Karen & Henry Kimsey-House's book, 'Coactive Leadership' (2021) may be worth a glance.
Reply
Joshua Stewart PhD
17/12/2024 02:08:30 pm
Hi Nick. Hope Theory, as outlined in your blog, provides a structured framework for fostering hope by integrating vision (desired future), way-power (strategies to achieve it), and willpower (motivation). While practical, its reliance on clear pathways and individual agency limits its applicability in highly complex, uncertain contexts where leaders may face systemic constraints or conflicting demands.
Reply
Nick Wright
17/12/2024 07:18:43 pm
Thank you, Joshua. I appreciate your thoughtful and detailed response, in particular comparing and contrasting Hope Theory with other different but related ways of handling dynamic complexity in systems and relationships. I work a lot with Appreciative Inquiry and I'm am currently reading Deborah Rowland's insightful book, 'Still Moving - How to Lead Mindful Change' (2017) which touches on adaptive approaches. You've given me a lot to think about.
Reply
Ali
17/12/2024 06:04:25 pm
Hi Nick,
Reply
Nick Wright
17/12/2024 07:21:13 pm
Thank you, Ali, for your affirming feedback and for sharing this great example from personal experience. You are one of those people who continually inspires me with the way in which you deal with challenges with resilience, resourcefulness and faith.
Reply
Debs Carter
17/12/2024 06:38:38 pm
Nice one, Nick!
Reply
Nick Wright
17/12/2024 07:21:38 pm
Thank you, Debs! :)
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Nick WrightI'm a psychological coach, trainer and OD consultant. Curious to discover how can I help you? Get in touch! Like what you read? Simply enter your email address below to receive regular blog updates!
|