‘You must throw your whole being against the life trap – your thoughts, feelings and behaviour.’ (Jeffrey E. Young) I’ve never been to a casino. In the past couple of weeks, however, I’ve had two fascinating conversations with people who work in casinos in Germany. I asked them if players can develop ways to improve their chances of winning, or whether winning or losing is purely a matter of chance. They both said ‘purely chance’ – with the mathematical probability of winning weighted heavily in favour of the casinos. I asked them if players ever believe they can improve their chances of winning, to reduce the loading of the dice against them. They both said ‘Yes’ too. Players may think they discern patterns in, say, roulette results, whereas they are random. This human ability and tendency to perceive patterns and to associate meaning with such patterns is known in psychology as the schemata phenomenon. I remember a philosophy tutor, Peter Hicks, inviting us, as students, to imagine he was holding a bag of 100 marbles. If he were to draw out one marble at a time, and every single marble was red, what would we guess the colour of the 100th marble would be? Now we know the colours of the 99 so far have nothing whatsoever to do with the colour of the 100th, yet everything within us still screams ‘Red.’ We superimpose a pattern, a schemata, based on what we have observed and experienced to date. There are psychological benefits. For instance: schemata enable mental short-cuts by allowing us to process familiar information quickly without needing to analyse every detail from scratch; they provide a sense of predictability and order that reduces uncertainty; they help us navigate relationships by enabling us to anticipate how people will react and to adjust our behaviour accordingly; they reduce emotional overwhelm by, instead of processing every situation as if for the first time, allowing us to rely on past experience to guide us; they speed up skill acquisition and problem-solving by providing mental frameworks that help guide our reasoning. There are risks too. For instance: schemata may lead to confirmation bias, where we selectively interpret information in ways that reinforce our pre-existing beliefs; they may lead to stereotyping and unfair generalisation of people, cultures or situations; we may experience disappointment, frustration or distress if reality doesn’t align with our expectations; negative patterns from the past may create unnecessary worry and avoidance behaviours now; if we assume our knowledge is absolute, it may discourage curiosity, learning and adaptivity; we may project our expectations onto others or fail to recognise their own unique perspectives. So, here are some techniques I’ve found useful: question whether your expectations about people or situations are based on facts or past experiences; be mindful of confirmation bias and stereotyping; engage with people from different backgrounds and cultures; try new activities, travel or change your routine to disrupt automatic thought patterns; view challenges as opportunities to refine your schemata; ask regularly, ‘What else could be true?’ to consider multiple possibilities for why something happened; if emotionally triggered, pause and ask whether your reaction is based on present or past experiences; try hard to make room for the new. Do you need help with breaking free from life traps? Get in touch!
16 Comments
Dr. Adrian Collins
4/3/2025 09:50:50 pm
Hi Nick. Interesting blog. Your discussion of schemata as both a cognitive aid and a psychological trap is reminiscent of Kantian epistemology: we structure reality through mental frameworks yet these same frameworks can obscure as much as they illuminate. I found your casino analogy particularly apt as it underscores our innate difficulty in grappling with true randomness.
Reply
Nick Wright
8/3/2025 11:07:36 am
Hi Adrian and thank you for sharing such thoughtful reflections. I found your links with Kantian epistemology and Hume's induction very insightful. Perhaps 'out innate difficulty in grappling with true randomness' is, itself, a key 'existential' question we face. I agree with the paradox you outlined too. It's not easy - and perhaps impossible - to step outside of our own self into a more objective place of knowing.
Reply
Katherine Willis, PhD
4/3/2025 09:54:15 pm
Hi Nick. I agree with Adrian above. This article presents an insightful exploration of the psychological concept of schemata, connecting it with real-world applications such as gambling behaviors. Your discussion appropriately highlights both the cognitive efficiency provided by schemata and the cognitive biases they can induce, particularly in cases of confirmation bias and stereotyping.
Reply
Nick Wright
8/3/2025 11:11:04 am
Hi Katherine. Thank you for your thoughtful reflections and encouraging feedback. As someone who tends to view the world of experience through an essentially phenomenological lens, the neuroscience arena could offer me some new and interesting alternative insights and ideas.
Reply
Jane Reynolds
4/3/2025 09:57:00 pm
Great blog Nick! The human brain is nature’s very own casino, running on rigged slot machines of confirmation bias and faulty assumptions. We love to think we’re so rational, but the moment we see five reds in a row on the roulette table, we suddenly become mathematical geniuses with our flawless gut instinct. This article does a great job of explaining why we’re all basically walking probability errors. It’s comforting, really. Whenever I make a bad decision, I can now just blame my schemata instead of my own incompetence. “It wasn’t me! It was my deeply ingrained cognitive shortcuts!”
Reply
Nick Wright
8/3/2025 11:12:57 am
Thank you, Jane - and thanks for such stimulating insights and metaphors through great use of humour! :)
Reply
Mark L
4/3/2025 09:59:29 pm
Nick, the human brain is lazy. Schemata exist because they save effort, not because they’re accurate.
Reply
Nick Wright
8/3/2025 11:14:00 am
Hi Mark. Thank you for sharing such wise insights so succinctly!
Reply
Isla Roseberry
4/3/2025 10:01:50 pm
The mind is a cartographer of chaos,
Reply
Nick Wright
8/3/2025 11:15:30 am
Thank you too, Isla. Interesting to see and feel how poetry can break the patterns of prose and reveal something new.
Reply
Elena Kaur
4/3/2025 10:05:19 pm
Hi Nick. Thanks for sharing this article. I believe there is something deeply profound in the way our minds construct meaning. We are meaning-seekers, storytellers of our own lives. We see a sequence of events and we weave a narrative. We are not content to exist in randomness; we must connect, interpret, assign purpose. This is our blessing and our burden.
Reply
Nick Wright
8/3/2025 11:18:16 am
Thank you, Elena - and for sharing such intriguing reflections so evocatively.
Reply
Sue Denby
5/3/2025 07:43:02 pm
Nick - you often seem to see "God at work" through patterns you observe in your life. Is that a schemata phenomenon too?
Reply
Nick Wright
8/3/2025 10:55:07 am
Thanks Sue - that's a great question. Yes, I see it as the critical distinction between discerning patterns that are there...and superimposing patterns that aren't there. It's not always easy to differentiate between the two in practice and, in my experience, it's only something I can only do with prayer and reflection. It's also something I do periodically with support and challenge from my own coach.
Reply
Sue Denby
8/3/2025 11:01:27 am
That's interesting, Nick. What does 'discerning' feel like..?
Nick Wright
8/3/2025 11:16:46 am
Hi Sue. Another great question. For me, it feels deeply intuitive, like a voice...a realisation...from something...Someone...beyond myself. Leave a Reply. |
Nick WrightI'm a psychological coach, trainer and OD consultant. Curious to discover how can I help you? Get in touch! Like what you read? Simply enter your email address below to receive regular blog updates!
|