‘A riot is the language of the unheard.’ (Martin Luther King) The recent street protests in the UK, some of which were accompanied by violent disorder, raise urgent and important questions about what lies beneath. A convenient political and media narrative is to blame the ‘far right’; a fairly nebulous and elusive phenomenon since, unlike in some other European countries, the UK doesn’t have anything like France’s National Rally or Germany’s Alternative für Deutschland. There are, however, individual and group influencers with populist, nationalist and, at times, racist agendas. They contributed significantly to fanning the flames of unrest via social media; offering a rationale and focus for anger, resentment and frustration. Yet, I don’t imagine that everyone that took part in protests, whether demonstrators or counter-demonstrators, had a unified or conscious agenda. People and groups can become swept away by intense waves of emotion – a craziness, of sorts, fuelled by excitement, anxiety or other powerful feelings. Some might have sobered-up the next day with a guilty hangover. A key question is what the far right tapped into: what already lay simmering below the surface that they ignited so explosively on our cities’ streets. It’s a question about the conditions in which any extremist ideology and narrative will appear convincing and compelling to those who buy into them. I see a dynamic, concerning interplay of at least three factors at work. Firstly, when people feel alienated and marginalised in a society, extremist groups may offer a sense of identity and belonging: ‘They don’t understand you, but we do.’ Secondly, when people feel confused or anxious in the world, extremist ideas may appear to provide simplicity and certainty: ‘We have the answer to your hopes and fears.’ Thirdly, when people’s lives feel meaningless and, furthermore, they feel powerless to influence or control things that matter to them, extremist stances may provide a sense of purpose and agency: ‘We will change things.’ These three combined: a powder keg.
18 Comments
Derek Thomson
3/9/2024 06:50:22 pm
A very interesting read and analysis, Nick. Over and over on the news, broadcasters call everyone who protested far right. Why do they do that? People protested on the streets for all kinds of different reasons.
Reply
Nick Wright
3/9/2024 06:51:38 pm
Thanks Derek. Ironically, labelling all protests and protestors as ‘far right’, in spite of the diverse and complex motivations for people joining them, risks feeding all three factors I listed at the end of this blog…and fuels support for the actual far right.
Reply
Paul Hudson
3/9/2024 06:53:03 pm
Brave man. Be careful what you write now Nick, you don't want the police knocking on your door for saying what you think!
Reply
Nick Wright
3/9/2024 06:56:16 pm
Hi Paul. The protests certainly pushed the 'freedom of speech' vs 'freedom from harm' issue to the top of the political agenda.
Reply
Dani Coleman
3/9/2024 06:55:12 pm
Please don't make excuses for the rioters Nick. Maybe they weren't all "far right" but they were violent thugs who smashed things up and terrified people.
Reply
Nick Wright
3/9/2024 07:02:03 pm
Hi Dani. Yes, I very definitely don't want to excuse the behaviour of violent criminals who took part in street protests. I visited my daughter's house on the worst day of the riots in Middlesbrough and it certainly was terrifying. I do, however, want to try to understand some of the broader underlying issues and dynamics that led to such widespread protests so that, in my own small way, I can do what I can to help address them.
Reply
Kathrin Hoffmann
3/9/2024 07:13:57 pm
Hi Nick, I think there is also a lot of frustration and boredom in these people. Finally something is going on, finally I can do something, finally the day is worth it and not pointless.
Reply
Nick Wright
4/9/2024 11:25:18 am
Hi Kathrin. I think that's a great insight. Yes, the drama and excitement of a protest can feel energising and a release from everyday boredom and frustration. It's also a shared experience that can provide a sense of being part of something bigger than oneself. Unfortunately, it can also spill over into violent disorder, providing a context and pseudo-excuse for criminal behaviour.
Reply
Funmi Johnson
3/9/2024 07:42:41 pm
Well expressed Nick. Somehow people have started to think in terms of a zero sum game. “If there are DEI initiatives for Black and Brown people, then there is nothing left for me”. The truth is that the conversation has to be more nuanced than that. The trouble is, the loudest voices are not interested in nuance, everything is boiled down to the lowest level and shouted about.
Reply
Nick Wright
4/9/2024 11:30:37 am
Thanks Funmi. I think zero sum game is a great way of framing it. I see similar false polarities on Facebook memes, e.g. 'We have homeless war veterans (vs) yet we are providing housing for migrants'. I agree that the conversation needs to be far more nuanced. As a close friend said recently, however, it's easier to convey simplistic views in soundbites to get media cut-through.
Reply
Elise McAvoy
3/9/2024 07:45:49 pm
Good article, Nick. Your photo is Hong Kong, I think?
Reply
Nick Wright
4/9/2024 11:31:41 am
Hi Elise. Yes - I think so.
Reply
Elise McAvoy
4/9/2024 11:44:10 am
So are you saying the causes of the UK riots were the same causes in Hong Kong?
Nick Wright
4/9/2024 04:49:01 pm
Hi Elise. That's an interesting question. We can think of causes in terms of issues, and of underlying dynamics. The Hong Kong protests were a reaction to China's increasing state influence in that administrative region. Hong Kong protestors felt they were losing their distinctive identity and autonomy. The UK protests were a reaction to uncontrolled/irregular immigration - again with protestors feeling concerned about a loss of power and identity. The specific issues and contexts were very different but some of the underlying social-psychological drivers were similar.
Rob Goldman
3/9/2024 07:48:47 pm
Hey Nick. Are you saying the far right and other extremists have found the answers to humanitys deepest needs?
Reply
Nick Wright
4/9/2024 04:38:46 pm
Hi Rob. By no means - although they are often skilled at presenting pathological, destructive narratives that masquerade as 'truth'. Daesh is probably the best and worse example of this perverse and dangerous phenomenon in recent times.
Reply
Paul Schröder
3/9/2024 07:53:57 pm
Hi Nick. It happens here in Germany also. The election results in East this week for AfD. The other Parties try stop them “firewall” but its not enough. We must understand why people choose AfD.
Reply
Nick Wright
4/9/2024 11:40:34 am
Hi Paul. Yes, I notice a similar dynamic emerging in various countries throughout Europe and Scandinavia. It's not enough...and, in my view, sometimes seriously counter-productive...to brand political movements like the AfD as 'far right' or 'neo-Nazi' without trying very hard to understand and respond to the underlying issues that explain their popularity.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Nick WrightI'm a psychological coach, trainer and OD consultant. Curious to discover how can I help you? Get in touch! Like what you read? Simply enter your email address below to receive regular blog updates!
|