‘Who does what?’ Someone asked this during a coactive appraisal workshop I was running with Sue Powell last week. Their focus was on roles, responsibilities and systems: ‘Who invites feedback from others?’ ‘Who fills in the form?’ ‘Who follows up any agreed actions afterwards?’ A different set of questions can reframe the conversation entirely: ‘What are we here to do?’ ‘What is the purpose of the appraisal?’ ‘How shall we do this?’ ‘What approach will achieve it best?’ The latter conversation invites the appraisee into the process as an active participant, not as a passive recipient. In fact, it invites all parties into a potentially transformational cultural conversation, not simply a discussion about performance or even development. ‘What is important to us that we (insert various stakeholders here) are trying to achieve?’ It touches on existential beliefs, purpose and values as much as pragmatic goals, actions and other such considerations. ‘What’s your passion?’ ‘How might you/we know what difference your contribution is making?’ ‘What will need to happen for that to happen?’ ‘What are we ready, willing and able to agree on – here and now?’ ‘What responsibility are you willing to take to move this forward?’ ‘What will you need?’ It can turn an oft bureaucratic process into an energising, supportive and challenging conversation where personal, team and organisational aspirations are harmonised and synergised. In my experience, no system, no matter how well designed or how simple or sophisticated its forms are, can achieve this change. Essential ingredients include: vision and values that resonate with deeper spiritual/existential/social values; leadership and culture that welcome and affirm personal and distributed leadership; relationships that nurture diversity, mutuality and trust. ‘Who does what?’: a good question. ‘What are we here to do?’ ‘How shall we do this?’: great questions!
42 Comments
Jeff Ikler
17/4/2016 03:48:08 pm
Thanks, Nick. A most deserving topic. I would add, "What results do we want / need, and are we getting them?"
Reply
Nick Wright
17/4/2016 03:51:10 pm
Thanks Jeff. Yes, results are an important aspect. From a coactive perspective, it can be interesting to reflect on who 'we' is and how 'we' choose to work together to achieve the 'them'. All the best. Nick
Reply
Lucy Barkas
18/4/2016 06:39:35 pm
Bringing co-activity into any convo is powerful. Bringing into performance management is essential. It's time to rethink traditional systems and start asking the important questions. What is the purpose and how may we design it together?
Reply
Nick Wright
20/4/2016 11:41:28 am
Hi Lucy. Well said - and thanks for such affirming feedback. All the best. Nick
Reply
Stephen Thorlby-Coy (MBA)
20/4/2016 11:42:22 am
I've been working on a new "appraisal" (we won't call it that!) process recently and it's so easy to get hung up on who does what and what the form looks like. The quality of the conversation is the most important thing. Does anyone have any other tips on how to make sure every employee has a good quality conversation?
Reply
Nick Wright
20/4/2016 11:45:37 am
Hi Stephen and thanks for the note. I share your reticence about the word 'appraisal', partly because it carries so many connotations and evokes all kinds of powerful emotions that, at times, get in the way of what could be a purposeful, imaginative, motivating and useful conversation. I'd be interested to hear more about the approach you are developing. All the best. Nick
Reply
Jackie Le Fevre
25/4/2016 01:19:27 pm
Hi Stephen Thorlby-Coy (MBA) I've worked with a few clients on annual review conversations and essentially the approach we took was to take each of the organisational core values in turn and say 'tell me about a time when you feel this was alive and kicking in something you were involved in? then what part did you play - what went well overall and why do you think that was - how could we be better in future. So we are basically using storytelling to uncover what activity feels most meaningful to the individual and understand better how their personal values resonate with the organisational core values. In this approach there are no rights or wrongs - it is all about deeper understanding - or deeper questions as Nick Wright might put it!
Reply
Gennaro Pisapia BA, Dip DigM
20/4/2016 11:46:48 am
This! "Essential ingredients include: vision and values that resonate with deeper spiritual/existential/social values; leadership and culture that welcome and affirm personal and distributed leadership; relationships that nurture diversity, mutuality and trust. ‘Who does what?’: a good question. ‘What are we here to do?’ ‘How shall we do this?’: great questions!"
Reply
Nick Wright
20/4/2016 11:48:27 am
Hi Gennaro. Does 'This!' mean this resonates for you too? All the best. Nick
Reply
William (Doc) Holiday
20/4/2016 11:50:57 am
Performance appraisal. 1. Given what I know of this person’s performance, and if it were my money, I would award this person the highest possible compensation increase. 2. Given what I know of this person’s performance, I would always want him or her on my team. 3. This person is at risk for low performance. 4. This person is ready for promotion today. All answered on a five-point scale, from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree".
Reply
Nick Wright
20/4/2016 11:52:32 am
Hi William. Sounds like you associate 'appraisal' with performance evaluation by one person of another person? All the best. Nick
Reply
Susan Scholtz
23/4/2016 11:29:11 am
Nick, what you are saying is so true, however, I am wondering how many managers will be willing to embrace this wonderful approach?
Reply
Nick Wright
23/4/2016 11:53:49 am
Thanks Susan. That's a good question. Perhaps the invitation and challenge is something about how far leaders, managers and staff are willing to entertain different possibilities for e.g. their stance in life, work and the world; beliefs about people and relationships with others; awareness of their own possibilities for initiative and influence; ability to frame and handle conversations skilfully that makes them meaningful and worthwhile etc.
Reply
Susan Scholtz
24/4/2016 11:20:50 am
Thanks Nick. insightful! It resonates well with the idea of relationship intelligence. Even the scary process of appraisal should be viewed in terms of the relationship system.
Nick Wright
24/4/2016 11:34:55 am
Thanks Sue. Yes - absolutely! 'How well are we relating to each other as we do this?' or 'What is the quality of contact between us?' are very different questions to 'What question are we on now?' or 'Which box do I tick?' All the best. Nick
Dr Patricia Ogilvie Frederick
24/4/2016 08:10:30 pm
A really innovative approach.
Reply
Nick Wright
24/4/2016 08:16:03 pm
Thanks Patricia. The approach we used with the groups was certainly different to anything they had experienced previously. Many participants were surprised to discover how far their personal stance, attitude, beliefs etc. could influence what happens in appraisal and, by extension, what is possible if they make shifts in any of those areas. Questions such as, 'Of all the things we could spend our time doing here and now, what would make this conversation worthwhile - e.g. for you, for this organisation, for your customers/beneficiaries?' also really brought the conversations to life. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Louisa Futter
25/4/2016 09:22:54 am
So good to see this value driven approach in action. Brilliant. Thanks for sharing.
Reply
Nick Wright
25/4/2016 09:34:22 am
Thanks Louisa. Yes, the approach is based on core beliefs and values - which we declared openly to the group - which I believe can prove transformational in terms of personal leadership, relationships and organisations. A key point in this case example was that the approach we proposed and worked through with the groups is consistent with wider aspirations and values held by the organisation. All the best. Nick
Reply
Tamsin Foxwell
25/4/2016 10:02:58 am
Great little reminder...
Reply
Nick Wright
25/4/2016 10:09:23 am
Thanks Tamsin. All the best. Nick
Reply
Clifford Morgan
25/4/2016 10:03:55 am
The right approach makes all the difference in so many areas of organisational life - especially performance appraisal.
Reply
Nick Wright
25/4/2016 10:07:30 am
Hi Clifford. I agree. I also believe that appraisal can focus on broader questions than performance, including e.g. motivation, engagement, fulfilment, relationships, progression, contribution etc. Some of these have an impact on performance but others touch more on the person as a human being in the context of work, not simply as an 'employee' at work. Does that make sense? All the best. Nick
Reply
Barry Richardson
25/4/2016 10:08:21 am
Good read.
Reply
Nick Wright
25/4/2016 10:08:44 am
Thanks Barry. All the best. Nick
Reply
Tom Ridley
28/4/2016 10:21:31 am
Great post Nick! Whenever I work with companies in relation to their appraisal process, the biggest challenge is moving them away from process and systems. I also think that there is too much emphasis on dissecting the period being appraised an not enough on identifying the learning that can be taken forward into the new year ahead. After all, the appraisal process should be about continuous improvement should it not?
Reply
Nick Wright
28/4/2016 10:32:30 am
Thanks for your encouraging response, Tom. Yes, I too encounter many organisations that are completely preoccupied with process, systems, forms etc - especially where appraisal is linked to pay. As a consequence, appraisals are often encountered and enacted as a bureaucratic experience or as a 'must prove myself' defensive routine.
Reply
Bibhu Panigrahi
2/5/2016 09:52:44 pm
Agreed. Appraisals should not just be about what you did and whether you did it on time. This approach dissociates employee performance from both higher organizational goals and the strengths and propensities of the employee.
Reply
Nick Wright
2/5/2016 09:54:28 pm
Hi Bibhu and thanks for the note. Yes, I think that focusing with the other person on things like higher vision and deeper values can often be more transformational than, say, focusing exclusively on day to day operational performance in a vaccuum. All the best. Nick
Reply
Jolene Wood
2/5/2016 09:55:13 pm
How about enticing your learners to submit appraisal and feedbacks by offering a free programme for d/l. That is to say they can receive a free anti-virus programme, Microsoft office for download if they submit the appraisal or feedback. You can find some of these programmes online.
Reply
Nick Wright
2/5/2016 09:57:19 pm
Hi Jolene. It sounds like you are proposing a way of incentivising people to complete appraisals by rewarding them if they do. It could work! I wonder, however, what behaviours it could drive that may be different to, say, high quality conversations or relationships. What do you think? All the best. Nick
Reply
Rachael Lemon
2/5/2016 09:57:59 pm
Great approach.
Reply
Nick Wright
2/5/2016 09:58:31 pm
Thanks Rachael. All the best. Nick
Reply
Matthew Benton
3/5/2016 09:41:23 am
Great post Nick, I've worked with large public sector organisation to improve workforce development. At one organisation, through feedback from employees, it was clear that improvements were needed in communication of the corporate vision and its priorities. One thing we did was to ensure, during appraisals, that a clear link was made back to how each individual employee contributed to the wider organisation, this then formed part of their target setting for the coming year. We also used forum theatre in order to get some clear messages out to mixed groups of employees and managers, on how appraisals should be conducted. We to implemented a feedback system for employees and managers following appraisals. Keep up the great work!
Reply
Nick Wright
3/5/2016 09:55:31 am
Hi Matthew. Thanks for such kind words of encouragement. It sounds like you approached the appraisal opportunity from a number of different angles to reinforce its focus, messages etc. I find that making direct links with wider vision and priorities can help people feel a sense of purpose and progress in their day to day work. This is certainly true for people who care about the difference their organisation is making for customers, community, country, world etc. Other people may be motivated by other things, e.g. relationships at work, career progression, financial reward etc. This means that exploring, understanding and responding to what matters most to people is very important for engagement - and appraisal can play a part in this. I've found, at times, that tapping into deeper spiritual, existential and cultural beliefs and values can also prove powerful and life-giving for performance, contribution and meaning-making. All the best. Nick
Reply
Jeannette Attryde
3/5/2016 09:56:47 am
Fantastic way of explaining this Nick. Throughout my years in various organisations the focus was on the process of the appraisal and any repercussions that may have (positive such as pay rise/bonus, or negative such as capability actions etc) rather than on the people involved in the process. I always endeavoured to make the conversations fully engaging and focussed on the individual. I have always said that appraisals themselves are not a bad thing - the way they are carried out can be though.
Reply
Nick Wright
3/5/2016 10:02:41 am
Thanks for your affirming feedback, Jeanette. I think you point towards an interesting and important question for organisations to consider: 'What's important to us that we're trying to achieve through doing this?' Appraisal carries symbolism in every organisation, e.g. apart from any functional value, to remind everyone who is boss and who isn't(!). I believe it also carries potential to support personal and cultural transformation. This is where paying attention to intention, relationship and how parties work together to achieve change is very important. All the best. Nick
Reply
Liz Catherall
3/5/2016 10:03:43 am
I always struggle with the time we have to 'fill in' the relevant forms and this type of conversation can be lost and therefore not recorded. I will be keeping this in mind in future though. Thank you.
Reply
Nick Wright
3/5/2016 10:07:32 am
Thanks Liz. I've worked in an organisation where, in an attempt to be rigorous, appraisal forms were 16 pages long. Nightmare! As a thought experiment, it can be useful to put the form face down on the table and say, 'If we were to do something really useful here and now, what would we be doing?' and to see how that shapes the conversation, both in terms of focus/content and method/approach to working together. All the best. Nick
Reply
Sara Pearson
13/5/2016 07:56:41 pm
Hi Nick, I think the problem is in the question. Let me explain. Business activity is focused around the achievement of the vision, values and objectives, with the end result of adding value and achieving long-term sustainability. To achieve business success and cultural transformation and engagement therefore necessitates a system-wide approach with a key focus on the creation of a performance culture rather than ‘appraisal’ which, in my opinion, causes more harm that good (often because they are ineffectively introduced and delivered).
Reply
Nick Wright
13/5/2016 08:03:56 pm
Thanks Sara. I think we are in fierce agreement..? In my experience, tapping into existential-spiritual issues at a personal and interpersonal level as well as wider strategic and cultural issues at a organisational level can create powerful change. All the best. Nick
Reply
26/3/2024 09:21:51 pm
I'm diving into "Appraisal" these days. The process of putting words to a concept, a feeling, or a story is truly fascinating. It's like taking something nebulous and giving it form, a bit like sculpting. The challenge lies in finding the right words, the ones that resonate and convey the essence of what I want to express. But when it finally clicks, there's a deep satisfaction in knowing I've captured a piece of my world and shared it with others.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Nick WrightI'm a psychological coach, trainer and OD consultant. Curious to discover how can I help you? Get in touch! Like what you read? Simply enter your email address below to receive regular blog updates!
|