NICK WRIGHT
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Testimonials
  • Articles
    • Organisations and leadership
    • Learning and development
    • Coaching and counselling
  • Blog
  • e-Resources
  • News
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Testimonials
  • Articles
    • Organisations and leadership
    • Learning and development
    • Coaching and counselling
  • Blog
  • e-Resources
  • News
  • Contact

Difficult

20/10/2016

178 Comments

 
Difficult is in the eye of the beholder. Or is it? If I’m working with you and find you difficult, doesn’t that mean you are difficult? If you find me difficult to work with, does that make me difficult? Or, looking at it differently, could it be that difficult is personally, culturally or contextually constructed? I’ll give some examples to show what I mean. Personal: ‘I don’t like your approach’; cultural: ‘Your style doesn’t fit here’; contextual: ‘Your way of doing things isn’t what’s needed here and now.’

There are all kinds of factors like these that can make a relationship feel difficult. If we’ve had a difficult encounter with a person before, or even someone this person reminds us of, the power of imagination can go wild. Stop for a moment. Imagine approaching a real person that you find very difficult to work with…as if about to enter the room. What stories are you telling yourself, albeit subconsciously, about yourself, the other person, the situation, God? How are they impacting you?

Our beliefs influence how we feel. What we believe and how we feel influence how we behave. What we feel and how we behave influence how the other person experiences us. We may make all sorts of assumptions about the other person, inferring intentions from their actions that may or may not be true. What we believe to be true is ‘true’ – for us. This should cause us to pause and reflect. What assumptions are we making? What may we be inadvertently evoking in the other person?

Curiosity can be a great bridge builder, especially if exercised with openness, courage and humility. If you encounter a ‘difficult’ person and relationship, try offering an observation first, invite feedback then explore goals and values. Observation: ‘I’m aware that we seem a bit stuck. What are you noticing?’ Goals: ‘A great outcome for me would be X. What would be a great outcome for you?’ Values: ‘What’s important to me in this is Y. What’s most important to you?’ What do you think?
178 Comments
Pete Mosley
20/10/2016 07:10:50 pm

Another great post, Nick. The point about curiosity is spot on. Thank you.

Reply
Nick Wright
20/10/2016 07:12:09 pm

Thanks for such affirming feedback, Pete. I've noticed in my own experience how hard it is, if not impossible, to be both curious and defensive at the same time!

Reply
Lilin
20/10/2016 08:06:09 pm

Very insightful Nick. Failing all of the above... adopting a 'whatever' attitude helps too😉😁😉

Reply
Nick Wright
20/10/2016 08:55:22 pm

Funny you should say that, Lilin. At the last place where I worked, one of my colleagues commented that I should have 'Whatever' printed on the back of my t-shirt! :)

Reply
Lilin
21/10/2016 05:54:54 pm

😀😀😀

Marie Smith, CPCC (Coach), FCIPD, NLP, MBTI, SDI
20/10/2016 08:52:02 pm

Being non-judgemental is always a useful approach when dealing with conflict or confrontation.

Reply
Nick Wright
20/10/2016 08:52:39 pm

I agree, Marie - as far as we are able to.

Reply
Bob Larcher
20/10/2016 08:53:16 pm

Hand on heart, I honestly believe that there is no such person as a "difficult trainee".

Reply
Nick Wright
20/10/2016 08:54:00 pm

Hi Bob. Do you believe in the possibility of a difficult relationship?

Reply
Bob Larcher
21/10/2016 10:15:21 am

Unfortunately, I have yet to become either a Jedi or Yen master, "a relationship it is".

Yes, I have difficult relationships; there are people with who it seems "to work" effortlessly and others where it is really hard. Maybe the question should be, 'is the relationship difficult" or is the "person difficult".

I sometimes run a session with groups entitled “dealing with difficult people”; I use a model based around “extreme types” (Tanks, Snipers, Grenades, etc.). Having asked participants to come up with ideas of dealing with each type“, I usually finish with, “so, after all that, who you are you difficult for?”

Nick Wright
21/10/2016 10:23:51 am

Hi Bob. You made me smile. Yes, I think that differentiating between 'is the relationship difficult' and 'is the person difficult' can be very useful. It enables us to reframe a situation and open up fresh possibilities for action. I'd love to hear more about your 'Tanks, Snipers, Grenades' model and how you use it!

I ran a workshop this week called, 'Dealing with Difficult People' (the title was deliberately provocative). At the start, I asked everyone to write down the name - confidentially - of one person they find really difficult. After some reflection on what they find difficult and why, I asked them to turn over the paper and write a list of people who may have written their name on the first side.

It caused some laughter in the group but also opened up the possibility that 'difficult' is a way of construing a person, a relationship, a situation rather than something 'objective' or fixed.

Bob Larcher
21/10/2016 11:16:22 am

The model is based on the book "Dealing With People You Can’t Stand" by Dr. Rick Brinkman and Dr. Rick Kirschner.

If you Google (or other) "Ten Types of Difficult People" you'll find some descriptions of the 10 types.

Nick Wright
21/10/2016 11:16:56 am

Thanks Bob. What a great book title! :)

Kevin C. Eagan
21/10/2016 10:03:09 am

As an instructor at AT&T, I learned very quickly that difficult participants may be more of a challenge to deal with however, you don't learn or grow from the easy classes. Difficult participants challenge you to develop new skills in classroom management and coaching so that they remain engaged and learn the content of the course. A hard line approach may be the easier path but doing the difficult work of getting to the root of the problem can put them and the class on a positive trajectory.

Reply
Nick Wright
21/10/2016 10:04:47 am

Hi Kevin. Yes, grappling with whatever is evoking behaviour that we or the group find difficult can prove transformative in the training room.

Reply
Kevin Hutchinson
21/10/2016 10:05:33 am

It's always good to look at why they are difficult. Find out what is making the people do what they are doing. If they are negative then get them to look at the positive in what you are trying to do for them. positivity breads positivity!

Reply
Nick Wright
21/10/2016 10:06:38 am

I agree, Kevin, that positivity can breed positivity. It can also breed resistance and cynicism if people feel unheard. I think that's why your 'why' question is so important.

Reply
Anna-Mari Siekkeli
21/10/2016 10:07:57 am

What we believe to be true is ‘true’. We make all sorts of assumptions and they influence how we behave. So true. When me manage to increase curiosity, openness and open-minded observation, there are not so many difficult people any more ..

Reply
Nick Wright
21/10/2016 10:10:06 am

Thanks Anna-Mari. Yes, and sometimes a spirit of openness and curiosity enables us to observe what a certain behaviour triggers in us - and how we can handle it differently.

Reply
Janice Tollini
21/10/2016 10:11:45 am

I recently attended a presentation by Debra Flick (sponsored by the OD Network Greater Denver Region) about mindfulness in leadership. She spoke of 'conscious communication' in understanding interactions. A part of that involves asking what needs are not being met and what is really being asked for. I think that keeping those questions in mind regarding the difficult person can be useful in understanding their point of view, and perhaps creating a collaborative rather than potentially adversarial situation.

Reply
Nick Wright
21/10/2016 10:13:44 am

Thanks Janice. That resonates with principles from Gestalt psychology too. Paying attention to needs (e.g. to feel safe, to feel heard, to feel included) can make a very significant difference to group dynamics. It links with underlying goals and values too.

Reply
Janice Tollini
21/10/2016 05:06:05 pm

I saw it as mirroring Dialectical Behavior Therapy initially (being aware of both thoughts AND emotions, clarifying needs and communication), but I can see the Gestalt piece as well. I appreciate the commonalities across disciplines.

Nick Wright
21/10/2016 05:06:58 pm

Hi Janice. I've never heard of Dialectial Behaviour Therapy. We live and learn!

Melanie Bowker
21/10/2016 11:14:52 am

Thanks Nick. This is very helpful and great timing.

Reply
Nick Wright
21/10/2016 11:15:19 am

Thanks Melanie. That's good to hear...I think?!

Reply
Allison Dolan
21/10/2016 01:24:19 pm

Good way to approach things when others are difficult in a 'normal' way; sometimes, however, people are difficult in a pathological way. And it isn't always easy to discern the difference.

Reply
Nick Wright
21/10/2016 01:27:05 pm

I think that's a wise insight, Allison. Do you have any examples of pathologically difficult people you could share (...without naming names, of course!)?

Reply
Allison Dolan
22/10/2016 09:20:29 pm

One of the major party candidates in the current US presidential race comes to mind...

Nick Wright
22/10/2016 09:21:05 pm

Hi Alison. I would be intrigued to know which one..! ;)

Allison Dolan
23/10/2016 12:54:14 pm

When the election is over, and, assuming he doesn't win, he should foster a number of different case studies!

Nick Wright
23/10/2016 12:55:14 pm

This is the country that voted George Bush Jr in more than once..?! ;)

Aremin Hacobian
21/10/2016 05:07:55 pm

Nick, the "curiosity" advice is spot on! How do we build awareness of our own biases and the impact they have on how we evaluate a situation and also influence others and their impressions/action? I try to use 3 guiding principles in my own work, at all times. First, approach each situation with curiosity, inquisitiveness and an appreciation for what is possible. Second, be aware of your own cultural beliefs and assumptions relative to the audience. Third, create an environment that recognizes diversity and unleashes it full potential.

Reply
Nick Wright
21/10/2016 05:09:19 pm

Thanks Aremin. Those sound like great principles to me!

Reply
Tara Parker
21/10/2016 05:10:51 pm

Interesting timing with your post, Nick; I was just asked how I "deal" with difficult personalities in the workplace. I thought for a moment and offered that I don't "deal" with anyone. I learn about them through observation and engaging in conversation with them and then determine the response that is best fits. You mentioned engaging in dialogue with clients and developing, essentially, a verbal agreement. I think that is great advice and should be kept in mind throughout the duration of the coaching relationship, not just at the beginning. As development occurs, there is a change to individuals approach, response and reaction making it important to keep communicating with our clients maintaining the focus of the relationship. Expectations and goals may only adjust a bit the person is likely changing a great deal - all the more reason to keep communicating.


Always enjoy your posts, Nick! Keep sharing with us!

Reply
Nick Wright
21/10/2016 05:14:44 pm

Thanks Tara! :) Sounds like 'deal with' holds connotations for you. I agree with you wholeheartedly that remaining open in communication is so important and...in my experience...sometimes challenging if we find the relationship difficult. It's so easy to develop a fixed view of a person and to relate to them from that fixed perspective...rather than allowing them, and us, and the relationship to move with fluidity over time.

Reply
Daniela Vellini
21/10/2016 05:15:51 pm

Top-notch in my sessions, very well written, I'd be very pleased to share it with public!

Reply
Nick Wright
21/10/2016 05:16:39 pm

Thanks Daniela. Feel free to share. Let me know if you receive any feedback!

Reply
Andy Scantland
21/10/2016 05:17:35 pm

Well said, Nick. This is a critical asks common issue for folks- how many interesting people do we avoid because 'we don't get along'?
the curiosity idea us a great one. when we approach ideas with curiosity, we tend to drop our judgment and can be so much more open to different perspectives (imagine actually learning something from someone we don't like- crazy!).
I also like to look at this from a hierarchy of needs- in interactions, we are generally.

Reply
Nick Wright
21/10/2016 05:19:03 pm

Thanks Andy. You know the expression, 'Curiosity killed the cat'? Conversely, it's often curiosity that revives broken relationships.

Reply
Marta Dana
21/10/2016 05:20:36 pm

I found some nice ideas and technique of challenging your assumptions in a Vital Smart training "Crucial Conversations". One of the activities they suggest to use in the training is very much alike with the one you described, Nick.

Reply
Nick Wright
21/10/2016 05:21:26 pm

Thanks Dana. That's good to hear. What other ideas or techniques have you found particularly useful?

Reply
Sarah Tan
21/10/2016 05:48:17 pm

1. I discuss their expectations of the training
2. I share the benefits of what they learn

Reply
Nick Wright
21/10/2016 05:49:01 pm

Hi Sarah. Can you say a bit more about 'share the benefits'?

Reply
Mark Brown
21/10/2016 05:50:02 pm

I know it's been said before but I'll say it anyway :-)
"No such thing as a difficult trainee, only inflexible trainers....."
I think this is pretty much the gist of what every is saying above.
Behavioural flexibility is the key!

Reply
Nick Wright
21/10/2016 05:52:37 pm

Hi Mark. Yes, it's a kind of truism in the training world. If we were to be curious and provocative for a moment, would we say the same about other 'qualities', e.g. there is no such thing as an enthusiastic trainee, an engaged trainee, a bright trainee etc?

Reply
Mark Brown
21/10/2016 07:11:50 pm

Hi Nick - I think there absolutely such a thing as 'an enthusiastic trainee' and every other emotional and behavioural state we can think of!! I think what we are all saying here is that is is the trainers job to be flexible and responsive in managing their own state so that they can create an environment and a desire for the trainee to enter into an appropriate state for learning to take place. I guess that's how you deal with difficult trainees :-)

Nick Wright
21/10/2016 07:12:43 pm

Well said, Mark. :)

Annette Segal
21/10/2016 07:10:18 pm

Thanks for sharing this!

Reply
Nick Wright
21/10/2016 07:10:49 pm

You're welcome, Annette!

Reply
Ameet Mattoo
22/10/2016 10:43:43 am

It has been said before, but i still want to say it - "There are no difficult trainees, just some who need more nurturing than others."
As trainers and facilitators, if we approach our participants from a stand of empathy and try and relate to their struggle - and see that it is this struggle which is manifesting as "being difficult" only then can we be helpful.

Reply
Nick Wright
22/10/2016 10:50:14 am

Hi Ameet. I empathise with your stance on this. I don't believe, however, that it's always about something about the trainee, e.g. a need for nurturing, a struggle. Sometimes it's about the trainer's unmet needs...or something the trainee triggers in the trainer or the group...or something about the wider culture or system (e.g. mandatory training, whether trainees believe they need it or not). 'What is really going on here?' could be a different way of approaching it. You may find this short related piece interesting? http://www.nick-wright.com/what-is-really-going-on-here.html

Reply
Ameet Mattoo
22/10/2016 09:12:20 pm

Hi Nick, Oh absolutely! I can't agree more. It does eventually boils down to the awareness of the trainer of his/her internal processes. And the way a person is behaving is a function of too many other factors (I call them multiple realities).
Having an empathetic approach towards the participant, enables the facilitator to be able to look beyond his/her own processes and then uncover all these multiple realities.
You may want read more about Multiple Realities: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/multiple-realities-impact-change-initiatives-ameet-mattoo

Nick Wright
22/10/2016 09:14:12 pm

Thanks Ameet - and for sharing a link to such an interesting blog!

Chris Pearse
22/10/2016 10:51:54 am

Nick - what your post tells me is that no one is difficult or easy - it can only be the relationship that is qualitative. We only experience others in relationship so to brand anyone else as anything (any adjective) has no sense - nonsense. And by extension of that fact, dealing with a difficult relationship means dealing with yourself as much the other person. In fact you could argue that your only experience of another is through your own personal thoughts and feelings - your responsibility, not theirs.

Reply
Nick Wright
22/10/2016 10:56:43 am

Thanks Chris. I think you expressed that well. I have, however, observed occasions where someone has been widely regarded as 'difficult', that is, by most people in a team or organisation. As well as trying to understand what is going on for the individual and their interpersonal relationships, that kind of situation makes me wonder e.g. what the person is expressing or manifesting that the organisation is suppressing or not paying attention to, or what that reveals about the wider culture or context.

Reply
Richard Sinton
22/10/2016 08:54:33 pm

Are they difficult students because the ability of the trainer cannot manage them? Are they our best opportunities to advance our competence in the training environment?

Reply
Nick Wright
22/10/2016 08:56:23 pm

Hi Richard. Yes, sometimes a person or group of people can test and stretch our capabilities. If that feels unwelcome or too uncomfortable, we may regard them as difficult.

Reply
Denise Valk Faisst
22/10/2016 08:57:52 pm

For me as a coach, there are no difficult clients. I see clients as people that are willing to work on them self or they are not willing to work on them self. The clients that are not ready yet to be coach will be the one that are not willing to take ownership of their behavior and there is were they refuse to do anything different. I do express to clients that they came to me, voluntary, to work on having a positive life experience. I am her to support , coach them in their new journey. I love what I do and I want to keep loving what I do so I do not have time for wasting any ones time. They choose to work with me or we go our separate ways. Either way is fine with me.

Reply
Nick Wright
22/10/2016 09:02:50 pm

Hi Denise. Sounds like you avoid difficulty in client relationships by allowing potential clients the freedom to work with you - or not. I'm curious. What if a client chooses to work with you but you find their attitude or behaviour difficult to handle?

Reply
Denise Valk Faisst
23/10/2016 01:11:12 pm

In some cases clients think they choose what they want but don't want to commit to it. Only having the desire to work with someone will not get you the behavior you want because it is not about me it is about the client and they have to do the work. Attitude and behavior issues could be signs that they maybe are not ready yet to work on them self. In that case I would recommend them to come back when ready. I can't help clients that are not ready to help them self.

Ruth Hazel Katz
22/10/2016 09:03:35 pm

Denise, I agree with what you have said !

Reply
David Noer
22/10/2016 09:04:56 pm

Nick, I don’t know if you saw the last U.S. Presidential debate in the UK, but if you did you observed an excellent example of how to deal with a difficult person. Hillary refused to get hooked when insulted, stayed on script, and used “I” statements. Sometimes plain speaking is better than therapeutic concepts and Mark Twain’s famous, “Don’t wrestle with pigs. They get happy and you get dirty,” is great advice.

Reply
Nick Wright
22/10/2016 09:08:17 pm

Hi David. I saw glimpses of the debate. Interesting that you should contrast plain speaking with therapeutic concepts. Can you say a bit more about that? Mark Twain's words remind me of Jesus' similar words: 'Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces.'

Reply
David Noer
23/10/2016 12:56:38 pm

Nick, my experience as both a coach and, in a previous live as a therapist, is that we sometimes get so bound up in technique, protocol, and professional boundaries that we fail to use clear, straight talk and lose both authenticity and the power of telling our truth

Nick Wright
23/10/2016 12:59:51 pm

I have seen and experienced that too, David. It raises important questions around e.g. intention, focus of attention and integrity.

Fran Reddick
22/10/2016 09:10:07 pm

I go back to they old KWL-what do you know, what do you want to learn? That method is great for focusing in on what we are about to do, especially when you are getting some hostility.

Reply
Nick Wright
22/10/2016 09:11:28 pm

Hi Fran. I would use similar questions as a way of exploring and reaching (where possible) clarity and agreement, e.g. 'What are we here to do?', 'What would make this worthwhile.', 'How shall we do this?'

Reply
Helena Clayton
22/10/2016 09:15:42 pm

Thanks for this, Nick. And while I realise this is a phrase that won't always be valid, thinking 'a difficult person is a person in difficulty ' really does help me get over myself sometimes, and reminds me to move more towards understanding and compassion.

Reply
Nick Wright
22/10/2016 09:18:53 pm

Thanks Helena. Yes, there are resonances in this short article that reframes 'trouble' to 'trouble-d': http://www.nick-wright.com/trouble-d.html Let me know if it strikes a chord?

Reply
Malinda Branson
23/10/2016 01:01:01 pm

Choosing to defuse rather than escalate is always the power position. This is well written and I appreciate you posting it.

Reply
Nick Wright
23/10/2016 01:02:35 pm

Thanks Malinda. I guess a challenge lays in how to defuse a situation without losing our integrity or becoming, in assertiveness language, passive or aggressive.

Reply
Debby Enoe
23/10/2016 01:03:27 pm

I do believe the situation can be on both sides, what are their prejudices about the situation and each other? It is far better to respond to the situation than react to it, far too many trainers react to situation/comments from trainees instead of responding, these can and often does lead to difficult relationships.

Reply
Nick Wright
23/10/2016 01:05:43 pm

Hi Debby. Yes, and being able to act in responsive rather than reactive mode often means creating sufficient time and space to prepare ourselves beforehand.

Reply
Mark Pereira, MBA, CPT
23/10/2016 01:06:56 pm

I find difficult trainees is an opportunity to help me learn, and to push myself harder to bridge the knowledge gap. I personally try to add demonstrations to even simply emphasizing key points.

Reply
Nick Wright
23/10/2016 01:08:59 pm

Hi Mark. It is certainly an opportunity to learn. I find it is often about learning to handle anxiety - in myself and in others in the group.

Reply
Koh Thong Joo
23/10/2016 07:20:36 pm

Nowadays, trainees are getting more demanding and vocal. We (trainers) need to ensure that we value add to the session and varies our training approaches to meet the needs of trainees. Build rapport with the difficult people, take to them separately and seek inputs from them how to make the session useful for them.

Reply
Nick Wright
23/10/2016 07:21:27 pm

Hi Koh. Yes, it's often about building rapport, credibility and trust.

Reply
Linda Randazzo
23/10/2016 07:22:10 pm

Great conversation!
I distinctly remember a class I was asked to give for operations employees to give them tools to become more sales minded. I know, your probably thinking that is the recipe of the ultimate polarizing environment!

"If I wanted to be in sales, I would have applied for sales!".......

As they settled into class, you could see the arms crossed, negative body language was abundant.

Realizing the challenge, before class, I made a good effort to find out why this was being done by the organization ahead of the training. I also decided that I would recognize and speak to the elephant in the room at the beginning of class. Asked for a show of hands of who didn't want to be there. All hands went up. Not surprising. Long story short, I took their tendency and skills to be detailed minded and showed them how much the bank and sales people needed these skills through actual mock exercises. At the end of class, they were wondering how the bank did without their skills prior to this initiative. Doesn't always end up as a success story when we are faced with these challenging situations but it really can help to know your audience and why they are being trained ahead of time.

Reply
Nick Wright
23/10/2016 07:24:38 pm

Thanks Linda. What a great example of doing your research, connecting with the people in the room and facing their concerns honestly.

Reply
Elizabeth Whiddett
24/10/2016 09:47:56 am

Enjoyed Linda's experience;asking who does not want to be there... you have given their body language voice so you can now move on.

Reply
Erik Eisel, PhD
23/10/2016 07:25:55 pm

There is an entire range to "difficulty." At the lower end of the scale, all that is required is to lower anxiety. A little higher up the scale, it might be necessary to have a private conversation with the trainee, away from the group, which starts off with the words, "it seems we've gotten off on the wrong foot..." A little higher up the scale, we have to learn how to deal with someone who is combative, and makes it her goal to disrupt the entire class. In all of these cases, there are strategies, which can be deployed. But, let's be honest, sometimes one just has to call Security! :-(

Reply
Nick Wright
23/10/2016 07:26:40 pm

Good points, well made, Erik!

Reply
James Ddungu,M.Ed.
23/10/2016 07:27:41 pm

As trainer it is important to pay attention to all the verbal and non verbal queues from the start of the class. Trainee introductions for example provide a lot of information about potential "hecklers". Understanding your trainees will determine the intervention, either you use the positivity approach, one one discussion and or even "calling security ".

Reply
Nick Wright
23/10/2016 07:28:35 pm

Hi James. Yes, I think it's something about being really present to the group and to the people in it.

Reply
Paul Shelton
24/10/2016 09:41:11 am

In my experience the problem of difficult trainees can be the fault of whoever is sending them, wrong level, inappropriate preparation, wrong reason for sending them even?

Reply
Nick Wright
24/10/2016 09:43:17 am

Hi Paul. The most 'difficult' training experience I've had was many years ago with a group of people who had been forced to take part. I was very inexperienced at the time and, mistakenly, tried to press ahead with the training rather than address the group dynamic.

Reply
Ian Henderson
24/10/2016 09:44:11 am

An insightful article as ever Nick. When we train our delegates in this area we always have them think about what it is that makes a person 'difficult'. Sometimes I ask them for the names of the people that they themselves are the difficult person! Strangely a lot of people struggle with that one!!

Reply
Nick Wright
24/10/2016 09:45:03 am

Thanks Ian. I borrowed your technique at a training workshop last week and it evoked a lot of nervous laughter in the room!

Reply
Ian Henderson
24/10/2016 04:28:04 pm

That's the only laughter I get!!!!!

Nick Wright
24/10/2016 04:28:30 pm

:) :) :)

Tim Dodd
24/10/2016 09:46:21 am

I love posts like this with practical tools I can start using tomorrow!

Reply
Nick Wright
24/10/2016 09:46:51 am

Thanks Tim!

Reply
Steven Ellis
24/10/2016 11:12:51 am

From my experience the "difficult trainee" often has a underlying issue for being in this frame of mind. This individual can become the most engaged of delegates. But you have to notice them, talk to them, understand them and there point of view. We often have tight schedules and may find it easier to ignore them, this can be a critical error and lead to an escalation as the session progresses. So go on take that step towards them. You may be surprised at the outcome.

Reply
Nick Wright
24/10/2016 11:14:56 am

Hi Steven. I really like the way you expressed that: 'take that step towards them'. It can make such a difference. A corresponding point is to ensure that we don't give the person so much attention that the rest of the group feels neglected - or that the rest of the group starts to act out similar behaviours in order to receive similar attention!

Reply
Mary Beth Wilkerson
24/10/2016 04:17:27 pm

Love the questions you pose at the end and can definitely see using these. I immediately had a difficult person I used to work with and if I had used these curiosity questions in my interactions my outcomes could have been much more successful! Thank you.

Reply
Nick Wright
24/10/2016 04:18:10 pm

Thanks Mary. I appreciate your feedback! :)

Reply
Tim Oakleaf
24/10/2016 04:22:28 pm

This is the area of my greatest need as it is my least experience. I embrace the commentary and am looking for more detailed resources if anyone has suggestions on web sites or readings or webinars on this topic.

My previous experience has all been with motivated and cooperative learners who responded positively to my efforts to love, appreciate, and facilitate. My "difficult" experience has only been recently. Yes, I am a bit spoiled in this regard!

I need a tool belt full of the best options. Thanks for getting me started!

Reply
Nick Wright
24/10/2016 04:26:13 pm

Thanks for such an open and honest response, Tim. You may find these related blogs and some of the comments under them useful? http://www.nick-wright.com/blog/hope-and-a-future; http://www.nick-wright.com/blog/how-can-we-experience-the-same-thing-so-differently

Reply
Joe Tassinari
24/10/2016 08:07:56 pm

Love how "inclusion" (both parties sharing) breeds connectivity :-)

Reply
Nick Wright
24/10/2016 08:08:57 pm

Thanks Joe. Yes, that's one of the values and benefits of co-active working.

Reply
Jay Barrett
24/10/2016 08:09:51 pm

This is assuming the person is rational and is receptive to your communication at some level. These assumptions may not be true, and one has to admit that any type of typical interaction may not be possible.

Reply
Nick Wright
24/10/2016 08:11:35 pm

I agree, Jay. The converse is also sometimes true: that we assume the person is irrational and not receptive to our communication. I assume the person is rational and reach-able unless I have good reason to believe otherwise.

Reply
Paul Cooper MCGI
24/10/2016 08:12:51 pm

The route to dealing this is simply communication. However, for some people, being the one to initiate and confront the problem can be overwhelming and beyond their comfort zone. Collaborative working isn't 'putting up with what the other wants for a quite life' because actually, YOU still aren't happy. Doing nothing is an option, but ultimately not the best option for either of you or the outcome you or your company may desire.

Reply
Nick Wright
24/10/2016 08:14:29 pm

Hi Paul. What you are describing here sounds like the difference between assertive and passive behaviour.

Reply
Vasudevan Govender
25/10/2016 08:56:21 am

Hi! One needs to Identify the type of "difficult" trainee and address the issue appropriately! The type referring to:-
# Does he/she think he is too smart for the group or you?
# Is he/she just a "loudmouth" ... seeking attention!
# Is he/she genuinely a smart individually ... making you feel threatened!
Given the 25 years exposure to these types, I found making that particular trainee a leader within the group, eliminates the "difficulty"!

Reply
Nick Wright
25/10/2016 08:59:52 am

Hi Vasudevan. The most common causes of 'difficult' behaviour I have encountered in training groups have been participants who have (a) been forced to attend and don't want to be there or (b) felt anxious - e.g. about feeling exposed or inadequate in the group.

Reply
Vasudevan Govender
26/10/2016 09:40:14 am

Hi Nick . I have had those types in my group and considered them as "challenges" as opposed to "difficult"! One on One sessions using Cognitive Empowerment strategy as worked wonders!

Nick Wright
26/10/2016 09:42:12 am

Hi Vasudevan. Would you be willing to share an example from your experience to illustrate what that would look like in practice?

Bob Foley
25/10/2016 09:01:08 am

I always use the Power of Persuasion in dealing with type AA as their question always is what's in it for me and I make sure the value proposition is part of the training so they understand the comp upside and the further value of supporting each other. Sets up a peer group that extends for the length of their employment.

Reply
Nick Wright
25/10/2016 09:01:44 am

Hi Bob. What are the Power of Persuasion and type AA?

Reply
David Tomlinson
25/10/2016 09:02:22 am

I was had a challenging delegate, who was confrontational, self opinionated almost to the point of arrogance. At the next break, his boss took me aside and apologised for his being difficult. Nothing to apologise for, I reassured, I not only understood him, I used to BE him. We are all on a journey towards maturity and self awareness, just that some of us are further along than others. Of course, that also includes me!

Reply
Nick Wright
25/10/2016 09:03:39 am

Thanks David. I appreciate your honesty. Sounds like you empathise well with 'difficult' people!

Reply
David Tomlinson
25/10/2016 11:25:31 am

Thanks Nick. There is a cure for youth, and we take a little of it every day! Few people set out to be difficult, it's just where they are right now in their development. We progress at different rates, from screaming toddler to grumpy teenager, we've all been "difficult", just some of us have got to the point where we can admit it.

Nick Wright
25/10/2016 11:26:10 am

Yep - I can relate to that!

Lisa Evans
25/10/2016 09:04:32 am

Curiosity can be a bridge builder. I really like that phrase Nick.

Reply
Nick Wright
25/10/2016 09:05:05 am

Thanks, Lisa!

Reply
Marcy Hall
25/10/2016 09:05:38 am

I enjoyed reading this Nick, and excellent last paragraph with the examples. Thank you for sharing!

Reply
Nick Wright
25/10/2016 09:06:03 am

Thanks Marcy. You're welcome. :)

Reply
Rebecca Turner, Ph.D
25/10/2016 09:07:00 am

This is a good post, and I agree it really works when the person is rational and at least willing to have a dialogue. There are those exceptional times when you deal with someone who truly does not want to solve the puzzle you present but rather wishes to stir things up. That's the toughest one.

Reply
Nick Wright
25/10/2016 09:12:09 am

Thanks Rebecca. Yes, I agree. In those cases, I now simply state what I am observing and invite exploration of that. I once had a very difficult relationship with a close colleague. I tried hard to resolve the tensions between us but to no effect. Eventually she confided honestly that she didn't care whether the tensions between us continued or didn't continue. It didn't affect her in the way it was affecting me. It taught me a valuable lesson! I had been wrongly assuming that (a) what I considered to be a healthy working relationship was what she considered too and (b) that the quality of our relationship mattered as much to her as it did to me.

Reply
Hans Armknecht
25/10/2016 09:13:24 am

I've found in my experience that helping others and myself with people I find difficult begins, as you say, with curiosity. But curiosity by itself isn't enough to help me transform myself or others. When curiosity does work, it is often because it comes with a change of heart or mindset about the person I am learning about. As well, I am more open to deeply and richly understand the effect I have played in the creation of any difficulties.

Here's a great video that shows some of what goes into such a mindset shift and why we sometimes, unknowingly but yet actively, hold onto our conflicts, unable to ever help things go right.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyhOT3jCcR4

Reply
Nick Wright
25/10/2016 09:15:55 am

Hi Hans. I agree that curiosity isn't enough...although it can be a good stance to relate from to shift our psychological, physical and emotional state and to open up new possibilities. Thanks for the link!

Reply
John F. Guarrine
25/10/2016 07:54:34 pm

Yes, this is a great way to deal with people, especially when when it is a challenge to do so. I find it most effective to make your observation as OBJECTIVE as possible i.e. what you can take in through your senses devoid of any judgement This is often difficult in the "heat of the battle," and why it can be so helpful, as Nick suggests to stop for a moment and reflect.

Reply
Nick Wright
25/10/2016 07:58:11 pm

Thanks John. I try to imagine myself observing the encounter, the conversation, from a detached position, as if standing in a different part of the room. If the situation is particularly difficult, I may call a pause and literally stand in a different place, then comment on what I 'observe' from that place.

Reply
Lorin Kierklewski Mask, M.A., CPLP
25/10/2016 07:59:18 pm

I once saw a title of book on a shelf that read: "No One Can Drive You Crazy if You Don't Give Them the Keys."

Reply
Nick Wright
25/10/2016 07:59:48 pm

Hi Lorin. What a great book title!

Reply
Alan Brown
25/10/2016 08:01:19 pm

Taking interest in another's perspective is a path to walking the yellow brick road, moving toward community, and opening connection to others.

Reply
Nick Wright
25/10/2016 08:01:59 pm

Hi Alan. Interesting use of 'yellow brick road'! :)

Reply
Gail Page
25/10/2016 08:02:53 pm

So right Nick! It never ceases to amaze me how we can all make assumptions then start acting as if they're true!!

Reply
Nick Wright
25/10/2016 08:06:24 pm

Thanks Gail. Yes, the first time I heard mention of this phenomenon was at a seminar by Selwyn Hughes. Commenting on the Biblical account of the Garden of Eden, he said that, 'When Adam and Eve believed Satan's lie, the lie became true for them'. That struck me as very profound. not simply in terms of what happened then but of what happens now.

Reply
Dave Johansen
25/10/2016 08:07:14 pm

Nicely written. As a trainer, this is a relevant topic for me. This issue, is a another communication challenge. It ends with understanding and having shared definitions about common concepts. It begins with being continually interested in what the other party perceives and values. The first step in working with another person should be questions for them about what they see as a success. Find out why they are involved. Making questions happen in the beginning, routinely, is very important. It isn't always easy, but it does tend to yield more positive results. Helping others to see the value in this line of thought is also useful. It's the type of development that opens doors and invites opportunity. The term "force multiplier" comes to mind. These lessons come from Covey, Scott, Duhigg, and Sinek. Read their work, use those tools, and see how your world changes for the better. I see it work all the time.

Reply
Nick Wright
25/10/2016 08:08:43 pm

I like how you expressed that, Dave: 'being continually interested in what the other party perceives and values.'

Reply
Clifford Seaton
25/10/2016 08:09:39 pm

Great topic and advice Nick. Early in my career I was introduced to, "seek to understand." Its a short and sweet way to avoid bias/judgment and find common ground/solutions. To Dave Johnson and Nick's point curiosity bridges the gap through engagement and reading. Thanks

Reply
Nick Wright
25/10/2016 08:10:42 pm

Thanks Clifford. 'See to understand' is good advice too. It reminds me of the 'Prayer of St Francis'.

Reply
James Graham
25/10/2016 08:11:37 pm

Take them round the back of the water cooler and give them some chin music. Works every time ;-)

Reply
Nick Wright
25/10/2016 08:13:07 pm

Hi James. As in 'idle chat' or 'punch on the jaw'? :)

Reply
Annie Weir
26/10/2016 09:26:08 am

You are all such lovely people. I, on the other hand, have started writing a book about 'difficult people' I have had on my courses. Yes, I know there are underlying reasons why they are 'difficult' and these can be worked through - but the situations can still be very difficult to deal with. All in a day's work : )

Reply
Nick Wright
26/10/2016 09:26:58 am

Hi Annie. 'On the other hand...'?

Reply
Gail Page
27/10/2016 06:22:24 am

Hi Annie I'm with Nick on this one!!

If I fall into the trap of thinking that someone is being 'difficult', I ask myself - "So what is it that makes ME think that THEY are 'difficult'?

I have ALWAYS found it's because there is something in me that is at odds with the other person's attitude, behaviours, values, beliefs, communication style or opinions.

It's a useful exercise for me to go through and reminds me that whenever I try to point the finger at someone else ... there are always 3 other fingers pointing straight back at me!!

Just my 10 cents worth and a different take on things :-)

Katrina Dowgird
26/10/2016 09:28:00 am

I like your curiosity approach Nick. It is always fascinating to see where you end up if you suspend judgements. Thank you for this article.

Reply
Nick Wright
26/10/2016 09:30:24 am

Thanks Katrina - you're welcome...and I agree. I find it harder to suspend judgement when I experience someone persistently as 'difficult'. In that case, I need to prepare myself beforehand so that I can handle the person, the situation, in the way I choose.

Reply
Lewis Stephens
26/10/2016 09:30:55 am

Good topic and have found Clifford's comment about seek first to understand actually goes a long way to bridge communication impasses.

Reply
Nick Wright
26/10/2016 09:32:07 am

Thanks Lewis. In my experience, that includes seeking to understand ourselves too!

Reply
Shannon Richards-Green
26/10/2016 09:33:42 am

Thanks Nick, a thought provoking article.

Reply
Nick Wright
26/10/2016 09:34:25 am

Thanks for the feedback, Shannon. :)

Reply
John Beecher MStJ, MA.
26/10/2016 09:36:38 am

The question is, are you there to teach or disciplin? If it’s the former, you probably need to identify what are the difficulties. Often, students who display an attitude that represents deviance is responding to a previous experience or a lack of confidence. By developing a rapport that values the learner, applying a humanist approach reduces perceived threats and contributes to the creation of an appropriate learning environment. Berne’s work on Transactional Analysis and Krathwohl protestations on Affective Behaviours are good starting points to develop the tutors understanding of such complexities. And remember, when the student is ready, the tutor appears.

Reply
Nick Wright
26/10/2016 09:37:44 am

Well said, John. Your final comment reminded me of Kevin Costner in 'Field of Dreams'!

Reply
Jamie Beaumont
26/10/2016 08:10:37 pm

Great points and I'll add that ultimately it's my training and I decided when it's time for someone to leave the group. Which Is a call I'm happy to make for the greater good.

Reply
Nick Wright
26/10/2016 08:11:11 pm

Hi Jamie. Good that you keep the needs of the wider group in view.

Reply
Barbara Foschi
26/10/2016 08:12:06 pm

I propose a "active listening" appoach, to open mental cages.

Reply
Nick Wright
26/10/2016 08:12:54 pm

Hi Barbara. 'To open mental cages' is a very evocative image!

Reply
Peter Siegl
27/10/2016 06:23:36 am

I set clear rules of engagement at the start of the session by requesting that all participants can raise issue but must "Come with good intent". I also ensure their expectations of the course can be achieved. I have managed difficult students by validating their point of view. In most case they just want to be heard and in their way they feel they are contributing. Ultimately if it continues and becomes disruptive then I agree with Jamie on asking them to leave for the benefit of the group.

Reply
Nick Wright
27/10/2016 06:25:44 am

Hi Peter. Setting clear rules of engagement can help, assuming participants are willing to abide by them. An alternative approach can be to co-create agreements with participants from the outset - to contract with them, e.g. 'What do we need from ourselves and each other to make this worthwhile for us?', 'What are we willing to commit to to make this work?'

Reply
Tendai Kufa (EMBA,BA,DipTM,DipAEd MIPMZ)
27/10/2016 07:20:41 pm

Toxic people are common in most organisations.

Reply
Nick Wright
27/10/2016 07:21:56 pm

Hi Tendai. In your view, what constitutes 'toxic'?

Reply
Tendai Kufa (EMBA,BA,DipTM,DipAEd MIPMZ)
28/10/2016 10:18:45 am

Toxicity is mainly negative perception of colleagues and the environment in which one works in . It can result in having aggressive behaviors towards peers, colleagues or even customers. It very dysfunctional.

Nick Wright
28/10/2016 10:20:12 am

Thanks Tendai. I have occasionally encountered people in organisations who display those characteristics. How do you deal with them?

Tendai Kufa (EMBA,BA,DipTM,DipAEd MIPMZ)
29/10/2016 09:11:15 am

There is no one solution to the problem, that is why it is important to ensure that your hiring is right. You can use multiple instruments including psychometric tests, behavioral based interviews to ensure your candidate have both person and organization fitness. If the drag net failures, cross culture training, coaching and leadership development can be useful. Counseling or managing them out but ensure compliance with legal requirements of your organisation.

Sue Ebanks
28/10/2016 10:22:09 am

The title alone "Difficult" strikes a chord of "Negative thinking" it's a great article Nick, thank you for sharing. I am a great believer in Person Centred Approaches, and you get a sense of that where the words " What's Important To You/Me". A Person Centred Approach encourages positivity, where individuals have the opportunity to explain 'Why it is Important TO them, and in addition, Why it's important FOR them. e.g. Its important to me to see my Grandchildren. Its important for me because it gives me a sense of contentment, well-being and energy.

I would add another word to "Openess; Curiosity; Humility" - The word is-CONFIDENCE.. without the Confidence to engage you would never get to the point where you can be Open; Curious and Humerous.

The concept of what makes for a difficult encouter/relationship may also habe something to do with: Experiences, and not just about cultural or contextual behaviour. What a person experiences from an engagement - How that engagement impacts on both you and the individual: How you feel; what are you thinking now as a result of the behaviours?

Excellent prompts Nick- To invite feedback that explores the: Observations; Goals and Values. superb, positive advicecthat can be adapted to any engagement Personal and Professional. Will definatley put this into action. K.R Sue

Reply
Nick Wright
28/10/2016 10:24:39 am

Thanks for your encouraging feedback, Sue. Yes, confidence - and a positive motive to engage - are important factors too.

Reply
Paul Craven
28/10/2016 10:26:12 am

Dealing with difficult people can be..... well, difficult. It's dealing with difficult people in front of others that is the real task here. The respect of the rest of the group depends on your attitude, so you need to get it right! Fully agree with the above - but add the rider : never, ever get angry or cross with, or upstage your difficult delegate.

Reply
Nick Wright
28/10/2016 10:28:25 am

Yes, Paul...it can be difficult. Contracting with the group from the outset about how we...rather than just I...will behave and work together can be a powerful approach.

Reply
Gail Page
28/10/2016 10:29:49 am

I'd love the group's thoughts on the following. Was this delegate difficult?

At a Communications workshop I was running a delegate became upset and exited the room. I checked to see that he was okay and when I returned, one of the other delegates was sitting on my stool - with a wide grin on his face.

I smiled back at him, went and sat in his seat and told him the name of the next exercise. He promptly asked for his seat back and I carried on as if nothing had happened.

Was he a difficult person? Not in my eyes. All I saw was someone that had a need to be seen and heard and thought that this was a good way to have his needs met.

He thanked me later for not making him look like a "dick". I told him he had done a great job of that all by himself!!

Being able to recognise that it's usually nothing personal and that it's the other person's stuff has stood me in good stead for almost 18 years of being in business.

So what would you have done?

Reply
Nick Wright
28/10/2016 10:35:10 am

Hi Gail. Great example. Sounds like you handled the situation in an open (and playful) rather than defended spirit which, in my experience, makes all the difference to the relationship and outcome.

Given that it was a Communications workshop, when you swapped seats I would have been tempted to pose a question such as, 'What are we communicating to each other and to the wider group by what we are doing - here and now?'

Reply
James Ashmore
29/10/2016 09:09:09 am

All clients are difficult, because all clients are human beings. Thats why they need us.

Reply
Nick Wright
29/10/2016 09:09:55 am

Hi James. All clients are difficult, or all clients experience difficulties, or both?

Reply
James Henman, Ph.D.
1/11/2016 11:05:56 am

Over the years I find that some of my best growth personally and professionally has come from clients that I initially thought of as difficult. The key is embracing the free information that comes with this awareness and allowing it to enrich the clinical/coaching relationship.

Reply
Nick Wright
1/11/2016 11:06:51 am

Hi James. That has often been my experience too...although sometimes excruciatingly painful at the time!

Reply
Linda Szetoo
1/11/2016 11:12:01 am

As a coach we learn that we want to approach a person(s) and/or situation(s) with open mind and non judgement. We do get stuck from time to time with our values, thoughts and desires, however as long as we use a mirror on ourselves and find what is coming up for ourselves we can handle difficulty more easily.

Reply
Nick Wright
1/11/2016 11:14:24 am

Thanks Linda. I agree. Sometimes the person we find difficult becomes the mirror for us that enables us to see ourselves more clearly.

Reply
Sue Cussons MBACP
23/11/2016 01:25:47 pm

Thanks for posting this.

Reply
Nick Wright
23/11/2016 01:26:26 pm

You're welcome, Sue.

Reply
Vicki Hall
25/11/2016 10:45:08 pm

I agree with your idea that curiosity about the differences between ourselves and the client can bring some enlightenment to the relationship. Exploration of our shadowside is always a tough call even for us therapists so great sensitivity and empathy is needed when embarking on these I-Thou interventions.

Reply
Nick Wright
25/11/2016 10:46:53 pm

Hi Vicki. Well said.

Reply
Gaelle Watson
22/12/2016 10:24:32 am

Very true, We call people difficult when they make us feel uncomfortable or even bad but often personality skills and background are different BUT complementary.

Reply
Nick Wright
22/12/2016 10:26:24 am

Hi Gaelle. Yes, there is a world of difference between an objective, 'You are difficult' and a subjective, 'I find X behaviour difficult to handle.'

Reply
Gaelle Watson
22/12/2016 11:48:26 am

I have actually learnt that my best results are very often when I work with people i initially found difficult: They see things differently, work differently and challenge me out of my comfort zone!

Nick Wright
22/12/2016 11:49:41 am

Hi Gaelle. That is often true for me too...although I sometimes have to get myself into the right mental, emotional and spiritual place first!




Leave a Reply.

    ​Nick Wright

    ​I'm a psychological coach, trainer and OD consultant. Curious to discover how can I help you? ​Get in touch!

    Picture
    Like what you read? Simply enter your email address below to receive regular blog updates!
    Subscribe to Blog
    Picture
    Picture


    ​Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011

    Categories

    All
    Abc
    Ability
    Accountability
    Achievement
    Act
    Action
    Action Learning
    Active Listening
    Activism
    Adaptability
    Adaptive
    Advent
    Adventure
    Advice
    Advocacy
    Africa
    Age
    Agency
    Agile
    Aid
    Alientation
    Ambiguity
    Anchor
    Angle
    Anthropomorphism
    Anticipation
    Anxiety
    Appraisal
    Appreciation
    Appreciative
    Appreciative Inquiry
    Approach
    Argyris
    Armaments
    Art
    Artificial Intelligence
    Asia
    Aslan
    Assertiveness
    Assumption
    Assumptions
    Asylum
    Asylum Seekers
    Attachment
    Attention
    Attitude
    Attribution
    Audience
    Authenticity
    Authority
    Autonomy
    Avoidance
    Awareness
    BANI
    Baptist
    Behaviour
    Being
    Belief
    Beliefs
    Belonging
    Bereavement
    Berlin Wall
    Bias
    Bible
    Body Language
    Borders
    Boundaries
    Brainstorming
    Brand
    Bridges
    Burnout
    Business
    Cages
    Calling
    Capability
    Cards
    Care
    Career
    Categories
    Censorship
    Challenge
    Chance
    Change
    Chaos
    Character
    Charity
    Child
    Children
    Choice
    Choose
    Christ
    Christian
    Christmas
    Church
    Clarity
    Client
    Climate
    Coach
    Coaching
    Co-active
    Coactive
    Cognition
    Cognitive
    Cognitive Behavioural
    Coincidence
    Collaboration
    Collaborative
    Commitment
    Communication
    Communism
    Community
    Compassion
    Competence
    Competencies
    Competency
    Complexity
    Concepts
    Confidence
    Confidentiality
    Conflict
    Confluence
    Confusion
    Congruence
    Conscience
    Consciousness
    Consequences
    Construct
    Constructivism
    Constructs
    Construe
    Consultancy
    Consulting
    Contact
    Content
    Context
    Contracting
    Contribution
    Control
    Conversation
    Corruption
    Counselling
    Counterintiution
    Counterintuition
    Countertransference
    Courage
    Craziness
    Creativity
    Credibility
    Crisis
    Critical Consciousness
    Critical Reflection
    Critical Reflective Practice
    Critical Reflexivity
    Critical Thinking
    Critique
    Cross
    Cross Cultural
    Cross-cultural
    Cross Culture
    Cross-culture
    Culture
    Curiosity
    Customer Care
    Customers
    Customer Service
    Dad
    Danger
    Darkness
    Death
    Deception
    Decision
    Deconstruction
    Defence
    Defences
    Deferred Gratification
    Definition
    Delight
    Delusion
    Dementia
    Democracy
    Demographics
    Depression
    Despair
    Determination
    Development
    Deviance
    Deviant
    Diagnosis
    Dictatorship
    Diet
    Dignity
    Dilemma
    Disability
    Disaster
    Discernment
    Discipline
    Disclosure
    Discovery
    Discrimination
    Disruptive
    Dissent
    Dissident
    Dissonance
    Distinctiveness
    Distortion
    Diversity
    Doomscrolling
    Dream
    Dynamic
    Dynamic Complexity
    Dynamics
    Dysfunction
    Dysthymia
    Easter
    Ecology
    Economics
    Ecosystems
    Edge
    Edi
    Education
    Effectiveness
    Efficiency
    Ego State
    Election
    Eliciting
    Emergence
    Emotion
    Emotional
    Emotional Intelligence
    Empathy
    Empowerment
    Encounter
    Encouragement
    Energy
    Engagement
    Entrepreneur
    Environment
    Equality
    Eternity
    Ethics
    Ethiopia
    Europe
    Evaluation
    Evidence
    Evocative
    Evolution
    Existential
    Existentialism
    Expectation
    Expectations
    Experience
    Experiences
    Experiment
    Experimentation
    Expertise
    Exploration
    Explore
    Exposure
    Expression
    Extremism
    Facilitation
    Facilitator
    Faciltitation
    Factors
    Faith
    Family
    Fantasy
    Far Right
    Father
    Fear
    Feedback
    Feeling
    Feminism
    Field Theory
    Fight Fight Freeze
    Fight-fight-freeze
    Fight Flight Freeze
    Figure
    Filter
    Fit
    Flashback
    Focus
    Focus Groups
    Food Bank
    Forgiveness
    Framework
    Freedom
    Free Speech
    Freud
    Friends
    Fun
    Future
    Gaza
    Gaze
    Gender
    Geopolitical
    Geopolitics
    German
    Germany
    Gestalt
    Gift
    Global
    Goal
    Goals
    God
    Good Friday
    Gospel
    Grace
    Grief
    Grit
    Ground
    Group
    Groups
    Groupwork
    Guidance
    Guilt
    Habit
    Healing
    Health
    Hear
    Heidegger
    Hermeneutics
    Hero
    Hierarchy
    History
    Holistic
    Holy Spirit
    Home
    Homeless
    Homelessness
    Honesty
    Hope
    Hopelessness
    Hubris
    Human
    Human Givens
    Humanitarian
    Humanity
    Human Resources
    Human Rights
    Humility
    Humour
    Hybrid
    Hypotheses
    Hypothesis
    Icon
    Idealising
    Ideas
    Ideation
    Identity
    Ideology
    Image
    Imagination
    Immersion
    Immigration
    Impact
    Impostor
    Improvisation
    Incarnation
    Inclusion
    Independence
    Influence
    Influences
    Influencing
    INGO
    Initiative
    Injustice
    Innovation
    Inquiry
    Insecurity
    Insight
    Inspiration
    Instinct
    Integrity
    Intention
    Intercultural
    Interdependence
    Interference
    International
    Interpretation
    Intersectionality
    Intimacy
    Introjection
    Introversion
    Intuition
    Invisible
    Invitation
    Iran
    Irrationality
    Israel
    Jargon
    Jesus
    Jolt
    Journey
    Joy
    Judgements
    Jungle
    Justice
    Keys
    Kindness
    Knowing
    Knowledge
    Labels
    Language
    Lateral Thinking
    Leader
    Leadership
    Leadership Teams
    Learner
    Learning
    Legacy
    Lent
    Lesson
    Liberal
    Life
    Light
    Linguistic
    Listening
    Logic
    Loss
    Love
    Management
    Manager
    Manipulation
    Marathon
    Marginalisation
    Marketing
    Martin Luther King
    Matrix
    Mbti
    Meaning
    Media
    Mediation
    Meditation
    Meetings
    Memory
    Mental Health
    Mentoring
    Merit
    Metaphor
    Metaphysic
    Metaphysics
    Mindfulness
    Miracle
    Mirror
    Mirroring
    Misfit
    Mission
    Mode
    Montessori
    Morality
    Motivation
    Music
    Mystery
    Narrative
    Nationalism
    Nativity
    Nazis
    Need
    Negotiation
    Neo-Nazi
    Networking
    News
    New Year
    Norm
    Norms
    Noticing
    Online
    Operations
    Opportunity
    Oppression
    Options
    Organisation
    Organisation Develoment
    Organisation Development
    Orientation
    Origin
    Outcome
    Pace
    Pain
    Palestinian
    Panic
    Paradigm
    Paradox
    Parent
    Partnership
    Passion
    Pastoral
    Pastoral Care
    Pattern Matching
    Patterns
    Peace
    People
    Perception
    Perfectionism
    Performance
    Perseverance
    Personal Constructs
    Personal Leadership
    Person Centred
    Perspective
    Persuasion
    Phenomenology
    Phenomenon
    Philippines
    Philosophy
    Physical
    Physicality
    Place
    Plan
    Plane
    Plans
    Platitude
    Plato
    Play
    Plot
    Polarity
    Policy
    Politics
    Poor
    Positive
    Positive Psychology
    Posture
    Potential
    Potential#
    Poverty
    Power
    Powerlessness
    Practice
    Pragmatism
    Praxis
    Prayer
    Preference
    Preferences
    Prepare
    Presence
    Presentation
    Principles
    Priorities
    Priority
    Privilege
    Proactive
    Proactivity
    Problem Solving
    Procedure
    Process
    Prodigal
    Professional
    Profit
    Progressive
    Projection
    Projects
    Prompt
    Propaganda
    Protection
    Protest
    Providence
    Provocative
    Psychoanalysis
    Psychodynamic
    Psychodynamics
    Psychology
    Psychometrics
    Psychotherapy
    Purpose
    Pushback
    Quality
    Quest
    Question
    Questions
    Race
    Radical
    Rainbow
    Rational
    Rationale
    Rationalisation
    Rationality
    Ratlonality
    Realisation
    Reality
    Reason
    Reasoning
    Reconciiliation
    Reconciliation
    Recruitment
    Reflect
    Reflection
    Reflective Practice
    Reflexivity
    Reframing
    Refugee
    Refugees
    Relationship
    Relationships
    Release
    Relief
    Religion
    Representation
    Rescue
    Research
    Resilience
    Resistance
    Resonance
    Resourcefulness
    Respect
    Responsibility
    Responsive
    Responsiveness
    Retreat
    Revelation
    Reward
    Rhetoric
    Rich
    Rights
    Riot
    Risk
    Role
    Role Model
    Roman Catholic
    Rosabeth Moss-kanter
    Rules
    Russia
    Sabbath
    Sacred
    Safeguarding
    Safety
    Salvation
    Satire
    Satnav
    Saviour
    Scepticism
    Schemata
    School
    Science
    Secure Base
    Security
    See
    Selection
    Selective Attention
    Self
    Self-deception
    Self-sacrifice
    Sense Making
    Sense-making
    Senses
    Sensitivity
    Serendipity
    Servant
    Shadow
    Shock
    Significance
    Silence
    Simplicity
    Sin
    Skills
    Skin Colour
    Snake
    Social Change
    Social Construct
    Social Construction
    Social Constructionism
    Social Constructs
    Social Enterprise
    Social Entrepreneurship
    Social Media
    Social Psychology
    Social Work
    Sociology
    Socrates
    Solution Focused
    Solutions
    Solutions Focus
    Solutions-focus
    Somalia
    Song
    South Sudan
    Space
    Speak
    Speech
    Speed
    Spirit
    Spiritual
    Spirituality
    Stance
    Status
    Stealth
    Stereotype
    Stereotypes
    Stereotyping
    St Francis
    Stimulus
    Storm
    Story
    Strategic
    Strategy
    Strengths
    Stress
    Stretch
    Structure
    Struggle
    Stuck
    Student
    Style
    Subconscious
    Subjectivity
    Success
    Sudan
    Suffering
    Supervision
    Support
    Survival
    Sustainability
    Symbol
    Symbolism
    Symbols
    Synergy
    Systems
    Systems Thinking
    TA
    Tactical
    Tactics
    Talent
    Teacher
    Teaching
    Team
    Team Meeting
    Teams
    Teamwork
    Teamworking
    Technology
    Teenage
    Tension
    Theology
    Theory
    Therapy
    Thinking
    Thought
    Time
    Touch
    Toys
    Traction
    Trade
    Trade Union
    Tradition
    Training
    Transactional Analysis
    Transference
    Transformation
    Transition
    Transitional Object
    Trauma
    Trends
    Trust
    Truth
    Turbulence
    Type
    Ubuntu
    Ukraine
    Uncertainty
    Unexpected
    United Nations
    University
    Use Of Self
    Valentine
    Vallues
    Value
    Valued
    Values
    Vicious Cycle
    Violence
    Virtuous Cycle
    Visibility
    Visible
    Vision
    Vocation
    Voice
    Voting
    VUCA
    Vulnerability
    Vulnerable
    Waiting
    Walls
    War
    Warning
    Wealth
    Weird
    Wellbeing
    Will
    Willingness
    Window
    Wisdom
    Witness
    Women
    Wonder
    Words
    World
    Worth
    Youth
    Zero-sum
    Zoom

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Testimonials
  • Articles
    • Organisations and leadership
    • Learning and development
    • Coaching and counselling
  • Blog
  • e-Resources
  • News
  • Contact