‘People look for HD photos whereas what’s really possible is dots on a page.’
I met with an insightful strategy consultant last week who used this ingenious metaphor. We live in an era where leaders face increasing complexity, ambiguity and uncertainty. This can evoke anxiety, risk-aversion and paralysis in decision-making. Against this backdrop, it’s tempting to attempt to increase our certainty by gathering and analysing exhaustive (sometimes exhausting!) reams of data, information and evidence. It’s as if we may want and need to see a high definition photo where every detail is present and crystal clear before feeling confident enough to take a step forward. I do get it. There are good reasons for basing decisions on research and evidence, especially in high-risk environments where to do otherwise could be reckless at best and dangerous at worst. Or if we miss great opportunities because we hadn’t looked well enough before leaping…or failing to leap. But what if such situations are the exception rather than the norm? What if ‘sufficient’ evidence is unavailable, or if it would take more time or other resources to gain it than we can afford, or if conditions are so complex and fluid that today’s truth fades quickly into tomorrow’s jaded history? Picture this alternative. A blank sheet on which we place dots. We can place them wherever we want. The dots represent what we do know, what we have a gut feel for, what we could reasonably find out – if needed. We can add, remove or move dots as things progress. We can experiment with reconfiguring the dots into different, creative, shapes and patterns. We can play with colouring the space between the dots, around the dots, to see what picture, what possibilities, what passions emerge. I love this idea of the dots. Of joining the dots. Of steps in faith. Of creating future.
58 Comments
Robert Hodge
22/5/2017 10:58:38 pm
I always appreciate your thinking. Thank you for this on dots.
Reply
Nick Wright
23/5/2017 09:02:10 am
Thanks for your encouraging feedback, Robert. My first instinctive response to the idea of 'fill in the spaces between boxes and lines' was to colour outside the boxes and lines! ;) I like the idea of 'chief glue' - what an intriguing metaphor. I have worked played with groups using dots and other symbols to see what emerges.
Reply
Ben North
22/5/2017 10:59:25 pm
I like the thinking, but sometimes you need to start with the big dots to go from SD to HD. Definitely an aspirational idea.
Reply
Nick Wright
23/5/2017 08:44:52 pm
Thanks Ben. Interesting comment. I think that what we consider to be the 'big dots' can open up very useful discussions about e.g. our assumptions, values, perspectives and strategic options.
Reply
Cath Norris
22/5/2017 11:00:02 pm
I love it Nick, start with what we've got...
Reply
Nick Wright
23/5/2017 09:07:22 am
Thanks Cath. I think 'what we've got' can open up all kinds of interesting and valuable questions and conversations, particularly if we view it through, say, Gestalt and social constructionist lenses.
Reply
Arthur Lerner
22/5/2017 11:00:46 pm
I want to add to what Nick wrote and to Robert's insightful comment.
Reply
Nick Wright
23/5/2017 09:10:38 am
Hi Arthur. I love that idea of shifting from a 2-dimensional triangle to a 3-dimensional one simply by adding another dot. It would be a great way of exploring, revealing and working with systems!
Reply
Arthur Lerner
23/5/2017 04:32:36 pm
Nick - You are indeed astute. While it has other "standard" applications, that is how it is most commonly used. Usually it's about connecting goals to behaviors in some way. My favorite was designed for a group of mangers in Asia
Nick Wright
23/5/2017 08:55:24 pm
Hi Arthur. I like the idea of cultural contextualisation. Too many models are applied mechanistically without paying attention to cultural beliefs, values, behavioural patterns and subtle nuances.
Lester Hirst
22/5/2017 11:01:33 pm
Great approach -- requires quite a bit of emotional intelligence!
Reply
Arthur Lerner
23/5/2017 04:30:35 pm
Actually, it needn't always. It is most typically is used to promote greater systemic/interdependence awareness. The example noted to Nick certainly dealt EI, as do almost all the pyradigms constructed for individuals.
Reply
Nick Wright
23/5/2017 08:46:30 pm
Thanks Lester. Interesting point! You may find this related short piece interesting: http://www.nick-wright.com/blog/spots Let me know what you think.
Reply
Arthur Lerner
23/5/2017 08:52:49 pm
Nick, thanks for referring to your article. It is very insightful about the un/semi-conscious emotional barriers at play in organizations. I think what you discuss is at or near the root of why so many change - esp. change "management" - initiatives fall short. This isn't the place to get more expansive, but one of the benefits of certain large group/large scale methodologies is that they reveal the variety of perspectives, + and -, people in big orgs can have and find ways to address them in the open. Thanks, too, for references to other articles. I will read them soon.
Nick Wright
23/5/2017 09:01:47 pm
Hi Arthur. I like your comment, 'people in big orgs can have and find ways to address (variety of perspectives) in the open.' It means that change efforts are more likely to be well-informed and engaging.
Ian Henderson
24/5/2017 09:54:51 am
Now that's different!
Reply
Nick Wright
24/5/2017 09:56:02 am
Hi Ian. I agree. I wonder if it will appeal more to Myers-Briggs N-P types than, say, S-J..?! ;)
Reply
Pete Mosley
3/6/2017 06:35:42 pm
Brilliant article, Nick, as usual. What a fab way to get clarity into a complex situation. Much appreciated - thanks.
Reply
Nick Wright
3/6/2017 06:36:38 pm
Thanks for such affirming feedback, Pete. Much appreciated.
Reply
Dori Staehle, MBA
3/6/2017 06:38:12 pm
Animated video. Pull the random dots together to create a solid picture. Could be cool. ;)
Reply
Nick Wright
3/6/2017 06:38:58 pm
Nice idea, Dori - although 'random' may be a matter of perception..?
Reply
Subramanian Narayan
3/6/2017 06:40:03 pm
Like the idea 💡 of using dots with different sizes and colours. What is missing are the rules around the colours and sizes and the possibilities of connecting the dots including arrows.
Reply
Nick Wright
3/6/2017 06:41:57 pm
Thanks Subramanian. 'Rules' is an interesting question. How would it be if we were to experiment without rules to see what new insights, patterns and possibilities may emerge?
Reply
Jackie Cummins
3/6/2017 06:43:08 pm
Should the dots be labelled with key words?
Reply
Nick Wright
3/6/2017 06:44:56 pm
Hi Jackie. The notion of 'should' begs some interesting questions. It's one possibility...if we would find the words - like labels - useful and not unhelpfully limiting?
Reply
Kay Wakeham
3/6/2017 06:48:20 pm
What an innovative idea. Thanks for sharing.
Reply
Nick Wright
3/6/2017 06:49:43 pm
Thanks Kay. Yes, I found it creative and stimulating.
Reply
Jim Ferran
3/6/2017 06:51:30 pm
There comes a time in the decision making process where too much information is as bad as too little. Acceptance and an understanding of the risk principles makes the decision making process easier. I always advocate the achievement of small marginal gains in the DM process as all too often people wait for the optimum moment which rarely appears. I watched a film recently, Eye in the sky, which drove the point about ' information hunger' home perfectly.
Reply
Nick Wright
3/6/2017 06:52:09 pm
Hi Jim. 'Paralysis of Analysis' comes to mind.
Reply
Laura Miller
3/6/2017 06:52:46 pm
What a brilliant way to look at something that can be potentially terrifying and complex to many people who are new to 'strategic decision making'. Simplicity over complexity. Love it!
Reply
Nick Wright
3/6/2017 06:56:58 pm
Thanks Laura. Yes, people in Western professional cultures often confuse 'simple' with 'simplistic' and, when it comes to decision-making, prefer rational over intuitive. I think the dots idea can allow radically different perspectives, paradigms, ideas, constructs and solutions to emerge.
Reply
Kim Hawkins
3/6/2017 06:57:43 pm
This is great. I've done something similar with sticky notes- my challenge was engaging the staff that like graphs and charts, rather than creative thinking. Will try the dots!
Reply
Nick Wright
3/6/2017 06:59:22 pm
Thanks Kim. I would love to hear more about what you have tried - including with sticky notes and with people who prefer graphs and charts!
Reply
Uday Arur
5/6/2017 10:20:22 am
Which pain of failure is greater - having referred reams of data, acted and then failed, or connected the dots acted, and then failed? Perhaps, reflecting on this could help us arrive at our individual comfort zones.
Reply
Nick Wright
5/6/2017 10:27:24 am
Thanks Uday. I think that's a great question. It would also reveal preferences and a sense of where we place our confidence - and why. An alternative framing could be, 'Which joy of success is greater...'
Reply
Lloyd D'Castro
5/6/2017 10:28:10 am
Good stuff, thanks.
Reply
Nick Wright
5/6/2017 10:28:32 am
Thanks Lloyd.
Reply
Wendy Grenfell
5/6/2017 10:29:06 am
I like it!
Reply
Nick Wright
5/6/2017 10:29:56 am
Thanks Wendy. That was my response too when the strategy consultant introduced her idea to me!
Reply
Arina Scholtz
5/6/2017 10:30:39 am
Great metaphor!
Reply
Nick Wright
5/6/2017 10:31:23 am
Thanks Arina. I agree! :)
Reply
Michele Seymour
5/6/2017 10:32:13 am
I once took a somatic approach - client had a tendency to lean forward when walking , it mean that his sphere of view was limited. He could see the ground in front of him only. I got him to stand against wall and I put a pencil between the wall and his 'leaning forward' upper back ....he could visibly measure his 'leaning' incline. I then invited him to lift his posture and therefore his head by breathing upwards and asked him what he saw ....'much more' he said. And therefore the longer view and bigger picture was more available to him , he could breath with more ease too so oxygenating his brain better. His walk slowed down as he became more conscious of his habitual determined drive to get things done ( operational ) versus the more considered and open posture needed to be more strategic. He agreed to a daily practice of changing his posture 5 x a day so his neural pathways could reconfigure to get the musculature to change and to give him the practise of switching between postures.
Reply
Nick Wright
5/6/2017 10:35:14 am
Hi Michele. Thanks for sharing such a creative and inspiring example from somatic practice. I love it! You may find this related case study-based article interesting? http://www.nick-wright.com/just-do-it.html
Reply
John b. May
5/6/2017 10:36:28 am
Have them keep constantly in mind the strategy and objectives of the organisation?
Reply
Nick Wright
5/6/2017 10:46:21 am
Hi John. I think strategic thinking can be useful to re-think what strategic choices we have and what strategic decisions we may choose? In my experience, it's often about future/environmental scanning - although these can prove difficult in complex, fluid situations that are subject to multiple and often unpredictable influences. This is where the 'dots' approach could, perhaps, allow greater responsiveness and agility?
Reply
Phillip Rutherford Ph.D FAITD FAIM
5/6/2017 11:10:18 am
This is a phenomenon I have been researching for over a decade now. Research for my Ph.D came up with some very interesting insights which I have employed in programs aimed at enhancing decision making in complex and asymmetric environments during training with Defence and Special Forces folk.
Reply
Nick Wright
5/6/2017 11:11:46 am
Thanks Phillip. Your research sounds interesting. Do you have any examples you could share from experience to illustrate what the two aspects you mention could look like in practice?
Reply
Sekararajan Balagurunathan
5/6/2017 11:13:11 am
With illustrative examples from commonly known sources.
Reply
Nick Wright
5/6/2017 11:15:36 am
Hi Sekararajan. Illustrative examples can certainly help to show what strategic thinking and decision-making can look like and involve, drawing on other people's and organisations' approaches to it. I wonder how else you might develop people's own strategic thinking skills...perhaps, at times, in contrast to 'received wisdom'?
Reply
Larry Tyler
5/6/2017 02:50:18 pm
You start with empowering them to make decisions. A lot of the big box companies that I have worked for want you to be executes of directives not decision makers and they are now paying for that thought process.
Reply
Nick Wright
5/6/2017 02:50:57 pm
Hi Larry. Do you have any examples to illustrate what you mean?
Reply
Natascha Lavery
6/6/2017 09:03:42 am
What are your ideas in training people to strategise, Nick?
Reply
Nick Wright
6/6/2017 09:10:58 am
Hi Natascha. My main area of experience is in developing strategic thinking. This could include conventional future/environmental scanning or dealing with VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguous) environments.
Reply
Kelly Williams
7/6/2017 09:09:22 am
Hi Nick, I like the set up to the figure a lot. The reason we see this challenge amongst leaders can be explained by brain functions. 75% of the population is what I call 'interpolative' or as MBTI would refer to as 'sensing' and neuroscience would say is someone who uses the dorsal pathway. They are the ones that things need to make sense to them. They can get extreme anxiety when burdened with major decisions and they just cannot get the picture on the jigsaw puzzle box that does not exist. 25% of the population are what I call 'extrapolative' or as MBTI would refer to as 'intuitive' and neuroscience would say is someone who uses the ventral pathway. They are the ones that make sense out of things. They thrive in this environment. And they are the ones that disrupt markets and start today tomorrow's next batch of the Fortune 500. But they get replaced by the efficiency experts who excel at the Weberian bureaucracy. https://medium.com/@Ultimate_Human_Dilemma
Reply
Nick Wright
7/6/2017 09:10:37 am
Thanks Kelly. Yes, I'm sure personal and cultural preferences are influencing factors on which approach people and organisations feel comfortable and confident with.
Reply
Wai K. Leong, MCC
8/6/2017 08:44:51 am
Excellent metaphor.
Reply
Nick Wright
8/6/2017 08:45:08 am
Thanks Wai. I agree.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Nick WrightI'm a psychological coach, trainer and OD consultant. Curious to discover how can I help you? Get in touch! Like what you read? Simply enter your email address below to receive regular blog updates!
|