NICK WRIGHT
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Testimonials
  • Articles
    • Organisations and leadership
    • Learning and development
    • Coaching and counselling
  • Blog
  • e-Resources
  • News
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Testimonials
  • Articles
    • Organisations and leadership
    • Learning and development
    • Coaching and counselling
  • Blog
  • e-Resources
  • News
  • Contact

Fantasy

5/7/2016

83 Comments

 
​Jackie LeFevre of Magma Effect is an inspiring and thoughtful guru in the values-related field. One of the things Jackie talks about is the importance of exploring the values and beliefs that lay behind people’s actions and behaviours. Two people could behave the same way but with very different reasons for doing it. Dave believes that people should arrive at meetings on time. For him, it’s about ensuring that time spent at meetings is efficient and effective. Sandra also believes it’s important to arrive on time. For her, it is about showing personal respect for colleagues in the room.

Why is this important? Covey in The Speed of Trust observed that, ‘We judge ourselves by our intentions and others by their actions.’ The risk here is that I assume your intention from your behaviour then respond and relate to you as if my assumption (that is, my own belief about you in that situation) is true. What is more, we tend to notice things that confirm and reinforce the belief we already hold and don’t notice things that would challenge or contradict it. All kinds of misunderstandings can occur and these can prove limiting or damaging to relationships.

This tendency is exacerbated if we are feeling tired, pressured or stressed. Somebody walks past my desk who normally stops and speaks to me. This time, they don’t speak. In fact, they don’t even look at me. I begin to hypothesise. If I’m already feeling anxious about the relationship, I may start to dream up an elaborate fantasy: ‘I’m sure they’re angry with me.’ ‘It’s because they didn’t like that email I sent.’ It’s a classic example of cognitive distortion. If we notice we are doing it, e.g. if we think we are reading the other person’s mind, it can really help if we simply stop and…breathe.
​
I discovered a useful ‘3 Hypotheses Technique’ in Latting & Ramsey’s Reframing Change that can be used to surface such assumptions and open up alternatives. The first step is to take note of what we assume the person’s action or behaviour means. The second is to assume the person has a positive intention. The third is to assume the person is being driven by external circumstances. If we are able to entertain the possibility that more than one of these could be true, it can create sufficient psychological and emotional shift to enable us to respond with far greater reality and freedom.
83 Comments
Ethelle Lord, M.Ed., DM
5/7/2016 10:36:44 pm

You are so right, Nick. I know an 81-year old female whose husband is living with dementia after a life-time of heavy, daily drinking. She often says "oh, life is a mystery". This has gotten her into a lot of trouble as she is living in a virtual world of her own. She normally will chose to get into the wine rather than resolve a problem. Something she learnt to do from her parents first and then living with an alcoholic husband. Reality and freedom are foreign to her!

Reply
Nick Wright
5/7/2016 10:40:27 pm

Hi Ethelle and thanks for the note. It sounds like the person you mention has, perhaps, created an idea of reality and behaviours that flow from and reinforce it as a way of coping. It shows how coping mechanisms we learn as children, often subconsciously, can influence our ways of coping in the present. All the best. Nick

Reply
Jackie Le Fevre
6/7/2016 01:49:00 pm

On the nose as ever Nick! Your observation about the fantasy we create when something happens in our world that triggers a sensitivity - the colleague not saying Hi - is very insightful. Brene Brown has done a lot of work in this area and she talks about 'the story I am telling myself right now' - have a read of this http://www.oprah.com/omagazine/Brene-Brown-Rising-Strong-Excerpt

Reply
Nick Wright
6/7/2016 01:50:51 pm

Hi Jackie. Thanks for the affirming feedback and for sharing the link. I think that, 'the story I am telling myself' is a great way of expressing this phenomenon. :) All the best. Nick

Reply
E.G.Sebastian (CPC)
6/7/2016 04:05:52 pm

Great one!!! I'll have to come back to this later (and make it Featured on LinkedIn for a few days). Powerful and critical question!

Reply
Nick Wright
6/7/2016 04:06:43 pm

Thanks EG!! :) I will look forward to hearing your thoughts. All the best. Nick

Reply
Robert Hodge
6/7/2016 04:07:21 pm

We use a simple model with the metaphor of the person's arm - ARM. We explain that one can judge Actions because they are obvious e.g. you were speeding. We can judge Results e.g. you got a ticket. We may not, however, create our own sense of your Motives e.g. you scoff at the law. In fact, you may be rushing to the hospital to a dying loved one, clearly speeding yet setting a priority between two parts of your life that you highly value. Later, I may just have to wave my arm at a coachee to back them away from making up motives of other people. In most difficult conversations (there is a book by that name), we usually start by asking a person's motives or intent. Much can be gained by that, yet it requires an honest inquiry within the heart as well as voice inflection . "Tell me what you were trying to accomplish and why" is quite different than "What in the world were you thinking?"

Reply
Nick Wright
6/7/2016 04:09:42 pm

Thanks Robert. I really like the ARM acronym and the way you use it physically to signal when assumptions are being made. It sounds like a great way of creating and reinforcing awareness in the room. All the best. Nick

Reply
E.G.Sebastian (CPC)
7/7/2016 08:29:23 am

Robert, are you familiar with the Steven Covey's story on paradigm shift (from his 7 Habits book?) - very similar to your concepts... Sometimes we judge and condemn; but when we hear the story behind the actions, we experience a Paradigm Shift, and instead of judging and condemning, now we understand and want to help (and even wonder how come they didn't go more "crazy," given the circumstances).

Reply
Yolanda Gomez Gray
6/7/2016 05:15:06 pm

I was just reading this morning in Ruiz's The Four Agreements about Assumptions. Hmmm....there's a message somewhere in this. Thank you Nick and Robert Hodge; I like the simplicity of ARM.

Reply
Nick Wright
6/7/2016 05:16:04 pm

Thanks Yolanda. Intriguing.. What does Ruiz say on this topic? All insights welcome! All the best. Nick

Reply
Hannah
6/7/2016 06:03:01 pm

I found this blog really interesting and helpful, it totally shifted my perspective! Thank you! :)

Reply
Nick Wright
6/7/2016 06:11:00 pm

Thank you for your encouraging feedback, Hannah. All the best. Nick

Reply
Carol Bleyle
6/7/2016 06:45:29 pm

I think you're right here. Patrick Lencioni mentions "fundamental attribution error" in his book The Advantage. It refers to how we think attribute our own negative behavior to external forces, but attribute others ' negative behavior to bad intentions. Even if we don't get to the 3 Hypotheses, just becoming aware of our unconscious reactions can make a huge difference.

Reply
Nick Wright
6/7/2016 06:46:27 pm

Thanks Carol. Yes, Lencioni expresses it well! All the best. Nick

Reply
Ericka Krystalyn
7/7/2016 08:20:22 am

"What is more, we tend to notice things that confirm and reinforce the belief we already hold and don’t notice things that would challenge or contradict it. All kinds of misunderstandings can occur and these can prove limiting or damaging to relationships." Story of my life!

Reply
Nick Wright
7/7/2016 08:23:27 am

Perhaps the story of all of our lives, Ericka! ;) In my experience, confirmation bias is a common human trait. Perhaps knowing that can make us more open to our own psychological filters and more willing to test and challenge them. Thanks for such an honest response. All the best. Nick

Reply
E.G.Sebastian
7/7/2016 08:28:06 am

Don Miguel Ruiz is the best - life changing. We've been reading (my kids and I) his "The Voice of Knowledge" book. It's an eye opener.... if you read it with an open heart :), and you'll never see the world the same way after reading it... His Mastery of Love as well is a masterpiece - I highly recommend it. I believe every couple should read it (and soak it in / live it).

Reply
Nick Wright
7/7/2016 08:31:05 am

Hi E.G. and Yolanda. OK, you've convinced me to check out Ruiz! :) All the best. Nick

Reply
Cath Norris, MA, BA, Dip Couns
7/7/2016 08:31:41 am

I really appreciate the potential applications for this Nick but I just got triggered. Assuming positive intentions and external drivers is pretty much what every person who stays in an abusive relationship does. Ouch. I don't believe for a moment that you're implying that should happen but it does raise a cautionary note regarding which circumstances and actions we stay with long enough to investigate intentions and drive.

Reply
Nick Wright
7/7/2016 08:41:50 am

Hi Cath - and thanks for posing such a good and important challenge! You've got me thinking. Behaviour in abusive relationships can be driven by a whole range of complex psychodynamic and social/cultural phenomena. If we think of abusive relationships as 'exceptional' rather than the norm, thereby demanding a different outlook and approach, I think that Latting & Ramsey's approach can still work well in many 'normal' situations. I would be very interested to hear how we might approach this differently in an abusive context. What do you think? All the best. Nick

Reply
Cath Norris, MA, BA, Dip Couns
7/7/2016 09:32:28 am

Nick, I agree that the differentiation is essential. I'm reminded of when my unacknowledged Western privilege was experienced as abusive by folks from marginalised cultures. What supported dialogue was the presence of a meta-witness (facilitator) and my willingness and ability to take on the accusations and acknowledge and process them. It went beyond explaining my intentions - there was only space for that once the injured party had been able to create the space within themselves through having the room to vent their hurt and be accurately acknowledged. Sometimes our intent and motivations must take second place to acknowledging the impact of our actions.

When there is a power dynamic at play we need awareness of how that impacts on our own and others position within any interaction. We need to recognise this aspect of interactions. A boss who is late for meetings is in a very different position to a subordinate who is late or waiting on their boss. Recognition of this is key to supporting folks to reach a point where they can see another's motivations or express their own. The dynamic needs to be acknowledged and worked with accordingly to clear the path. Hope that helps :)

Nick Wright
7/7/2016 09:39:26 am

Thanks for sharing such profound insights, Cath. Approaching the conversation, the relationship, the dynamic through the lenses of impact and power rather than, say, intention can itself shift the conversation, the relationship and the dynamic. I think the assumptions and intentions dimension can play an important part here too, e.g. to clarify our intentions in holding such a conversation, to explore what implicit or explicit assumptions each party brings to the conversation etc. Thanks again - lots to think about. All the best. Nick

Cath Norris, MA, BA, Dip Couns
13/7/2016 12:06:49 pm

Yes definitely Nick. I don't want to do down the incredible impact that staying open to exploring our own and others intentions can have. I'm interested in how we clear the way for such valuable work. The practice of clearly recognising and stating our own intentions supports transparency and authenticity in ourselves and others. It can help to reveal common ground and build respect for diversity. It can bring rank, privilege and power dynamics to the forefront and allow them to be acknowledged and worked with constructively as we reveal and explore how such factors impact on our intentions and interactions Thanks for sharing on such a stimulating subject :)

Dave Smith
7/7/2016 09:44:55 am

Confirmation bias - seeing only the things that reinforce our assumptions and rejecting those that challenge it - is a blinkered mindset. An open one would notice those "anomalies" and question if they were on the right track, rather than stubbornly assume they were and proudly conflate the right signs as evidence.

This is a similar concept I brought up when delivering Systems Testing courses: developers use test data that shows it works, testers tend to use test data to show where it fails - or, in other words: developers submit code believing it to be correct, testers accept it believing it to flawed - and run tests that attempt to prove it.

Similarly, there is an absence-of-errors fallacy here: testing can only show evidence of errors; if an error emerges, you can state with certainty one exists. If, after tests, no errors emerge, can you say with certainty that no errors exist? Generally you would look at flawed tests that discovered nothing.

So.. returning to the point: we can only guess at someone's intentions or feelings, we don't know for certain what they are but we must also not fall into the trap that no indication of a specific behaviour does not necessarily imply that behaviour does not exist, only that it has not been displayed.

A final point about our assumptions versus others' behaviour: I've always maintained that the only person you can change is YOU. And in changing your behaviour, you influence the way others see - and then - behave towards you. You cannot control someone's attitude, but you CAN control your own reaction to it.

Reply
Nick Wright
7/7/2016 09:48:00 am

Hi David and thanks for the note. I'm intrigued by your comment that, 'we must also not fall into the trap that no indication of a specific behaviour does not necessarily imply that behaviour does not exist, only that it has not been displayed.' Can you say a bit more about what you mean, perhaps with an example to illustrate it? Thanks! All the best. Nick

Reply
Dave Smith
13/7/2016 09:17:12 am

A simple example is: just because I'm not smiling, it doesn't mean I'm not happy.

Smiling generally implies happiness, but some falsely assume that a lack of smile indicates a lack of happiness - i.e.: the person is sad.

I recently read an article where someone was deep in thought and a stranger shouted "smile!", interrupting that train of thought because the stranger falsely assumed the person was unhappy.

It's a situation where someone doesn't realise their well-intentioned interference is unwelcome and counter-productive, and may then get defensive about a seeming lack of gratitude when in fact it was their decision based on a flawed analysis of the situation that caused it - not an ungrateful recipient.

Carol Bleyle
13/7/2016 09:19:50 am

Good point Dave about attributing motivations to the absence of a behavior as well. If someone doesn't respond right away to an email or request, for example, we often assumed they are purposely blowing us off, when that might not be the case at all.

David Evans
13/7/2016 09:09:58 am

Thanks for these thoughts, Nick; great brain-fodder. I like the work of Richard Barrett and have used his values-based "cultural transformational tools" several times in order to surface the unseen and develop a root-cause analysis approach to change. It is amazing that focussing on values and beliefs provides such a rich canvass on which to build new beginnings, for teams, individuals and organisations.

Reply
Nick Wright
13/7/2016 09:15:22 am

Hi David and thanks for your encouraging feedback. Yes, I agree on the rich canvass. I would be very interested to hear more about Barrett's cultural transformational tools. Could you share a bit more? Thanks and all the best. Nick

Reply
Laura Lingle
13/7/2016 09:24:58 am

The Four Agreements
by Don Miguel Ruiz

Reply
Nick Wright
13/7/2016 09:26:14 am

Thanks Laura. Yes, Ruiz sounds interesting. What are the Four Agreements? Intrigued! All the best. Nick

Reply
Aaron Bradley
13/7/2016 09:26:55 am

a great model I have used is "the ladder of inferance"details the phsycology and thinking process we often go through without realising it.

demonstrating how our belief sytem and other factors can impact out ability to come to logical outcomes resulting in assumptions and jumping to conclusions.

Reply
Nick Wright
13/7/2016 09:28:55 am

Thanks Aaron. Yes, Argyris' Ladder of Inference can be a very useful tool for surfacing beliefs and assumptions. All the best. Nick

Reply
Adam Morris
13/7/2016 10:11:10 am

Interesting piece Nick. I would add a fourth hypotheses which is to consider the language being used by the person to possibly offer some insight or idea about what internal circumstances (our internal narratives, identity conclusions and taken-for-granted beliefs) are influencing their behaviour and decisions.

Reply
Nick Wright
13/7/2016 10:13:44 am

Thanks Adam. I agree that language can provide a real window of insight. Reflecting back and exploring language can act as powerful tools for awareness-raising. I'm curious - how might you frame that as a hypothesis? All the best. Nick

Reply
Adam Morris
13/7/2016 01:46:23 pm

Using your format, I'd say "assume the person is driven, often unconsciously, by internal beliefs and narratives".

Then an approach is to pay attention to the language used by the person, being curious and co-enquiring into why they use that language and explore positively - and as safely as possible, the constructs underpinning their narratives and beliefs while at the same time challenging your own assumptions of them and their actions/words.

Nick Wright
13/7/2016 01:47:12 pm

Many thanks, Adam. I really like that! :) All the best. Nick

Adam Morris
13/7/2016 03:01:42 pm

Hope it's helpful. If you've not read it, I recommend "Dialogic OD" by Gervase Bushe and Robert Marshak (Berrett Koehler, 2015) strongly. It's a helpful and engaging read.

Nick Wright
13/7/2016 03:07:08 pm

Thanks Adam - I'll order a copy now! All the best. Nick

Lisa Gentile, MS, CPLP
13/7/2016 10:16:35 am

In the 3 Hypotheses Technique I would swap the word assume for the word ask.

Reply
Nick Wright
13/7/2016 10:23:42 am

Thanks Lisa. I believe that Latting & Ramsey's are using the word 'assume' to mean 'to entertain the possibility that' as a way of creating a psychological and emotional state that can enable a person to approach a person or situation with greater openness. To ask, where that is possible, would enable a person to test whether any particular hypothesis they hold is true - depending, of course, on whether they receive a true response and whether they believe it - which is a much bigger topic! I'd be interested to hear more about what 'to ask' holds for you. All the best. Nick

Reply
Jim Mondry
13/7/2016 10:24:46 am

Nick - this is good, but it stops short of truly expanding the awareness of your target for this post: what is needed is to explore the values and motivations of the other person. It's not enough to to assume they are trying their best (yes, they are trying their best). When we open ourselves up to others perspective and values, we can get stretched into new potentials for our relationships at work (and beyond), learning how to leverage the best of each other.

Reply
Nick Wright
13/7/2016 10:40:00 am

Hi Jim and thanks for posing such an interesting challenge. I would not propose that to assume someone is trying their best is always enough in a relationship. That itself would be an assumption or, in this context, a fantasy. In some situations, it would be unhelpful too. However, surfacing and testing assumptions, e.g. by posing challenging alternative hypotheses, can be a useful way of opening up fresh possibilities - especially if we or the other are 'stuck' in our assumptions, blind to them and unable to move from that place. Beyond that, I agree with you that exploring values and motivations can be very useful, not least because beliefs and values often lay behind the assumptions we make about the world and about other people. Let me know if I've missed the point you were making! All the best. Nick

Reply
Michael Duffy
13/7/2016 12:07:43 pm

Really great topic. ..so many angles to explore. ..got to read more of this...thanks for the post!

Reply
Nick Wright
13/7/2016 12:08:56 pm

Many thanks, Michael. Let us know any insights and ideas you discover on route! All the best. Nick

Reply
Lollo Mofolo
13/7/2016 12:11:25 pm

NLP also tells us that the 'map is not the territory', thereby encouraging us not to assume, make generalisations and form distortions. Thank you Nick and Cath for useful insights.

Reply
Nick Wright
13/7/2016 12:12:25 pm

Thank you, Lollo. Yes, I think that's a really useful insight from NLP. All the best. Nick

Reply
E.G.Sebastian (CPC)
13/7/2016 12:13:37 pm

Nick and Cath... I just enrolled in an online Masters degree in Psychology - as soon as I get my degree, I'll come back and read your comments again :)

[ok, be nice and don't call me a "smart ass" - it's just a loving teasing :), as I enjoy reading how deep you go with analyzing this... and I even understand half of what you are saying :) - Do you both have a Therapist/Psychology/or Psychiatry background? ]

Reply
Nick Wright
13/7/2016 12:17:16 pm

Lol, E.G. You made me laugh! :) Are our backgrounds really that obvious..? ;) Enjoy the Masters degree. :) All the best. Nick

Reply
Cath Norris, MA, BA, Dip Couns
13/7/2016 12:18:47 pm

All the best with that EG. Thanks for your appreciation...given as ever in your own wonderful, inimitable style!

I trained in life development counselling and psychotherapy for 5 years, applied the model that I learned to organisational development and one to one work. I then did a master's in somatics (roughly translates as what it takes for us to feel alive in our bodies) then did another masters in process work psychology applied to working with conflict and organisational change. I'm a learning junkie. More recently began studying 'the Art of Hosting collaborative conversations.

Looking forward to sharing in your learning :))

Reply
John Gianni
13/7/2016 12:20:27 pm

Head on, with the group, if the assumptions are vocalized you have no choice but to deal with them. Collaboration to a resolution has always worked well. You must ensure that it doesn't take o er the class

Reply
Nick Wright
13/7/2016 12:21:21 pm

Thanks John. I'm curious - what would do to deal with them 'head on'? Do you have any examples? All the best. Nick

Reply
Steven Kramer
13/7/2016 12:22:09 pm

Reframing helps and various exercises that improve awareness.

Reply
Nick Wright
13/7/2016 12:23:36 pm

Thanks Steven. Do you have any examples of exercises that would improve awareness? All the best. Nick

Reply
Meenakshi Badhwar
13/7/2016 12:24:48 pm

Trainer always carries sharp observation skills to get other's assumption ..While interacting with the audience it gives you as a trainer a instinct to feel or understand it.

Reply
Nick Wright
13/7/2016 12:26:52 pm

Hi Meenakshi and thanks for the note. Yes, observation skills are important. Do you have any examples of how you have surfaced and addressed assumptions in a training group? I would be interested to hear more. All the best. Nick

Reply
Heather Joseph
13/7/2016 12:27:47 pm

A Trainer can often make an assumption about a person as soon as they come into a room, but if you are a good trainer you may often put this particular assumption at the back of your mind but be still aware. I once made an assumption and during the session I found that the assumption I was making was in fact valid but at the end of the session the trainee made the time and effort to speak to me afterwards and explained, how I made her feel inclusive with everyone in the room.

Reply
Nick Wright
13/7/2016 01:01:11 pm

Hi Heather and thanks for sharing such a personal experience. I remember an impacting experience early in my training practice. Someone entered the room who appeared very cocky, arrogant and boisterous. I commented to my co-trainer that this person could be 'trouble' - too 'full of himself'. My co-trainer challenged me gently but firmly: 'Everyone has their own way of dealing with anxiety.' This simple reframing of the situation and the potential meaning behind the person's behaviour changed my own attitude completely and has always stayed with me. All the best. Nick

Reply
Linda Kepschull-Boes
13/7/2016 01:02:04 pm

Far too often the assumptions are left unchecked when and where possible I believe heavily in the pregnant pause as it brings to the surface those issues just slightly hidden. When a moment like it happens the rest of the group often feels more trust and commitment to the course 👥

Reply
Nick Wright
13/7/2016 01:05:15 pm

Hi Linda and thanks for the note. Yes, I have a good friend, Rob Abbott, who is a masterful trainer. He has an amazing way of simply pausing-with-presence in such a way that raises all kinds of things to the surface that would otherwise lay hidden. All the best. Nick

Reply
Tim Oakleaf
14/7/2016 08:32:12 am

I have recently learned to count to 7 Mississippi to allow them time to collect their thoughts and begin to express themselves. That's a minimum.

Reply
Nick Wright
14/7/2016 08:33:59 am

Thanks Tim. I like that. There's something unique about the power of silence in the presence of another to surface awareness, insight and ideas to the surface including, at times, awareness of assumptions-being-made. All the best. Nick

Reply
Phillipus Jacobus Blignaut
14/7/2016 08:35:47 am

Good evening Nick sometimes student's and learners will get under your skin and it's your responsibility have a clear set of rules laid out before the session begins, don't compromise on those rules as time management is one of our key factors in getting the job done. I have recently encountered the same issue of having to have a mister know it all in one of my lectures which I had to deal with, I had him agreed to let the training session run its course and asked Mr Know it all to assist the learners who were slower than what he was. During the session I managed to get all my topics covered and at the some time I had the other students find confidance.

After the students built-up confidance in him I request him to assist in the practical aspects and he informed me that he had know time for it as it would be a waist of his time. I then proceced with the practical session by operating the equipment first and my learners to follow my lead, after we all finished I requested Mr Know it all to step up to the plate we discovered that he had know knowledge or expirrance in operations which lead me down to the basics of education. There has always been practical and theoretical people and very few which have both. As a trainer you should remember to set the rules,follow the time and control the croud, if training was easy every body would be doing it.

Reply
Nick Wright
14/7/2016 08:43:59 am

Hi Phillipus and thanks for sharing such an interesting example from personal experience. It sounds like the person you describe arrived at the training with beliefs, values, assumptions, expectations etc. that could have been useful to explore? Agreeing and sticking to ground rules for behaviour and ways of working can help ensure a group achieves its task on time. Exploring and addressing assumptions around areas such as, 'what are we here to do?', 'how shall we do this?', 'what is possible if we do this well?', 'what will this call for from us?', 'are we willing to do it?' can be powerful to increase engagement too. All the best. Nick

Reply
Makarand Orpe
14/7/2016 08:45:28 am

In a group, Trainer drops (unexpectedly in a casual manner) an "Open statement" which is an unbiased statement relevant to the Subject of discussion and carefully observe the responses or reactions of a group while continuing his discussion. This will give an opportunity to a trainer to silently perceive Assumptions in a Group. The beauty is that the Good Trainer gets a very useful guidance from those surfaced "Assumptions in a Group" which help him or her to reach easily to his group of participants and to deliver his subjects interestingly.

Reply
Nick Wright
14/7/2016 08:49:27 am

Hi Makarand and thanks for the note. I think that is a very interesting way of surfacing assumptions. I guess the risk is that the trainer could (will) make assumptions about the group's assumptions, based on what the trainer perceives and interprets from their responses. What are your ideas about how the trainer could test that with the group to avoid misunderstandings? All the best. Nick

Reply
Lisa Gentile, MS, CPLP
14/7/2016 08:50:58 am

As professional coaches we are, by definition, obligated to come from a place of questioning. When we recognize our own biases surfacing during a coaching engagement we decide how to not make it a burden for the client. Projections have to be cleared out. If we want to test the thought as a possible insight regarding the client's agenda, we have to find a genuinely empathetic way to ask the client whether the idea applies. So holding the word "ask" matters.

Reply
Nick Wright
14/7/2016 08:55:41 am

Thanks Lisa. I really like your way of expressing that, especially the notion of 'how to decide not to make it a burden for the client' and how 'to test the thought as a possible insight'. Many thanks. All the best. Nick

Reply
Allison Francis Barksdale, MBA/CPLC
15/7/2016 08:43:39 am

These are good ideas, but I am concerned about the use of "assume" (whether positive or negative). I think it far better to checkin with ourselves if we are feeling an uneasiness - our instincts are the best guide. If there is a concern, about someone else's behavior, it is also best to check in with the other person to clarify and confirm. If we truly have an intention for a positive interaction and growth on the part of our client, we have the power to ensure it. By checking in, it is easier to correct and move forward. I am not being naive to the fact that people do not always readily admit their motivation. So observation of verbal and nonverbal clues help in an atmosphere of trust.

Reply
Nick Wright
15/7/2016 08:54:29 am

Hi Allison. I think you pose a valid challenge to the idea of 'assuming' and I agree with your approach to checking in with ourselves and the other person. Latting & Ramsey propose the 3 Hypotheses Technique in the context of 'being in the question'. It's about one way of creating a psychological and emotional state and stance from which a person may feel more open and able to engage in the kind of inquiry you are advocating. II wouldn't encourage a person to 'assume' instead of inquire but, for some people in some relationships (especially where there are e.g. power dynamics they find intimidating or they are unable to access the person immediately or directly), it could be a useful preparatory approach. Does that make sense? All the best. Nick

Reply
Frederic Stansfield
15/7/2016 09:47:08 am

We have to recognise that we cannot free ourselves of all our hidden asumptions, specifically the ones we are unaware that we have. However, tools such as the 3 Hypotheses Technique are good because they make us more self-aware and therefore less biassed. The fundamental rule is that we should always work in partnership with the client.

Reply
Nick Wright
15/7/2016 09:51:14 am

Thanks Frederic. Yes, a challenge can lay in the assumptions we and/or the client are unaware of. You may be interested in this related blog: http://www.nick-wright.com/blog/delusion I would be interested to hear your comments. All the best. Nick

Reply
Deb Barnard
15/7/2016 11:43:52 am

Nancy Kline's (Time to Think) work can centre on working with assumptions: are they true, false or possible. e.g. People might laugh at me. 'That's true, people might laugh at you, and what are you assuming behind that?' She works to find, what she calls, the bedrock (subjetive) assumption. http://www.timetothink.com/uploaded/Coaching%20in%20T.E.%20N%20Kline.pdf

Reply
Nick Wright
15/7/2016 11:51:50 am

Thanks Deb. That's a great article on raising awareness of limiting assumptions. Many thanks for sharing. All the best. Nick

Reply
Chrissy Derrer, SPHR
16/7/2016 02:02:37 pm

Love the 3 hypotheses technique- start from the heart, assume the best- if leaders would reinforce these simple habits, workplace productivity would soar! Thanks for sharing.

Reply
Nick Wright
16/7/2016 02:03:24 pm

Thanks Chrissy - you're very welcome! :) All the best. Nick

Reply
Sue Anderson
18/7/2016 12:33:32 pm

Interesting article. Thanks!

Reply
Nick Wright
18/7/2016 12:34:11 pm

You're welcome, Sue! All the best. Nick

Reply
Rosie Miller
18/7/2016 12:34:56 pm

Thank you for this interesting article. I like the way you remind us all that most change starts with creating possibilities that things could be different from what we automatically thought/assume or even fear. Right now, post the Brexit vote, there is a lot of us in the UK needing to keep remembering this approach to what is happening around us.

Reply
Nick Wright
18/7/2016 12:37:34 pm

Thanks Rosie. Yes, the UK Brexit situation has demonstrated very graphically how fantasy - especially when driven and dramatised by media/social media - can go wild. You may be interested in this related blog: http://www.nick-wright.com/blog/delusion Let me know what you think? All the best. Nick

Reply
Annette Segal
19/7/2016 04:16:32 pm

Thanks Nick Wright for pointing our attention towards the murky area of assumptions - murky because it is here we often get into trouble. My own coaching urges people to get very curious and ask questions from the energy of openness, so this post was welcome! Thank you.

Reply
Nick Wright
19/7/2016 04:19:17 pm

Thanks Annette. Yes, it can be a challenge to know what we are assuming, especially as assumptions often lay under the surface, behind what presents itself as 'objective' information, truth etc. You may find this related short piece interesting? http://www.nick-wright.com/blog/delusion Let me know what you think? All the best. Nick

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    ​Nick Wright

    ​I'm a psychological coach, trainer and OD consultant. Curious to discover how can I help you? ​Get in touch!

    Picture
    Like what you read? Simply enter your email address below to receive regular blog updates!
    Subscribe to Blog
    Picture
    Picture


    ​Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011

    Categories

    All
    Abc
    Ability
    Accountability
    Achievement
    Act
    Action
    Action Learning
    Active Listening
    Activism
    Adaptability
    Adaptive
    Advent
    Adventure
    Advice
    Advocacy
    Africa
    Age
    Agency
    Agile
    Aid
    Alientation
    Ambiguity
    Anchor
    Angle
    Anthropomorphism
    Anticipation
    Anxiety
    Appraisal
    Appreciation
    Appreciative
    Appreciative Inquiry
    Approach
    Argyris
    Armaments
    Art
    Artificial Intelligence
    Asia
    Aslan
    Assertiveness
    Assumption
    Assumptions
    Asylum
    Asylum Seekers
    Attachment
    Attention
    Attitude
    Attribution
    Audience
    Authenticity
    Authority
    Autonomy
    Avoidance
    Awareness
    BANI
    Baptist
    Behaviour
    Being
    Belief
    Beliefs
    Belonging
    Bereavement
    Berlin Wall
    Bias
    Bible
    Body Language
    Borders
    Boundaries
    Brainstorming
    Brand
    Bridges
    Burnout
    Business
    Cages
    Calling
    Capability
    Cards
    Care
    Career
    Categories
    Censorship
    Challenge
    Chance
    Change
    Chaos
    Character
    Charity
    Child
    Children
    Choice
    Choose
    Christ
    Christian
    Christmas
    Church
    Clarity
    Client
    Climate
    Coach
    Coaching
    Co-active
    Coactive
    Cognition
    Cognitive
    Cognitive Behavioural
    Coincidence
    Collaboration
    Collaborative
    Commitment
    Communication
    Communism
    Community
    Compassion
    Competence
    Competencies
    Competency
    Complexity
    Concepts
    Confidence
    Confidentiality
    Conflict
    Confluence
    Confusion
    Congruence
    Conscience
    Consciousness
    Construct
    Constructivism
    Constructs
    Construe
    Consultancy
    Consulting
    Contact
    Content
    Context
    Contracting
    Contribution
    Control
    Conversation
    Corruption
    Counselling
    Counterintiution
    Counterintuition
    Countertransference
    Courage
    Craziness
    Creativity
    Credibility
    Crisis
    Critical Consciousness
    Critical Reflection
    Critical Reflective Practice
    Critical Reflexivity
    Critical Thinking
    Critique
    Cross
    Cross Cultural
    Cross-cultural
    Cross Culture
    Cross-culture
    Culture
    Curiosity
    Customer Care
    Customers
    Customer Service
    Dad
    Danger
    Darkness
    Death
    Deception
    Decision
    Deconstruction
    Defence
    Defences
    Deferred Gratification
    Definition
    Delight
    Delusion
    Dementia
    Democracy
    Demographics
    Depression
    Despair
    Determination
    Development
    Deviance
    Deviant
    Diagnosis
    Dictatorship
    Diet
    Dignity
    Dilemma
    Disability
    Disaster
    Discernment
    Discipline
    Disclosure
    Discovery
    Discrimination
    Disruptive
    Dissent
    Dissident
    Dissonance
    Distinctiveness
    Distortion
    Diversity
    Doomscrolling
    Dream
    Dynamic
    Dynamic Complexity
    Dynamics
    Dysfunction
    Dysthymia
    Easter
    Ecology
    Economics
    Ecosystems
    Edge
    Edi
    Education
    Effectiveness
    Efficiency
    Ego State
    Election
    Eliciting
    Emergence
    Emotion
    Emotional
    Emotional Intelligence
    Empathy
    Empowerment
    Encounter
    Encouragement
    Energy
    Engagement
    Entrepreneur
    Environment
    Equality
    Eternity
    Ethics
    Ethiopia
    Europe
    Evaluation
    Evidence
    Evocative
    Evolution
    Existential
    Existentialism
    Expectation
    Expectations
    Experience
    Experiences
    Experiment
    Experimentation
    Expertise
    Exploration
    Explore
    Exposure
    Expression
    Extremism
    Facilitation
    Facilitator
    Faciltitation
    Factors
    Faith
    Family
    Fantasy
    Far Right
    Father
    Fear
    Feedback
    Feeling
    Feminism
    Field Theory
    Fight Fight Freeze
    Fight-fight-freeze
    Fight Flight Freeze
    Figure
    Filter
    Fit
    Flashback
    Focus
    Food Bank
    Forgiveness
    Framework
    Freedom
    Free Speech
    Freud
    Friends
    Fun
    Future
    Gaza
    Gaze
    Gender
    Geopolitical
    Geopolitics
    German
    Germany
    Gestalt
    Gift
    Global
    Goal
    Goals
    God
    Good Friday
    Gospel
    Grace
    Grief
    Grit
    Ground
    Group
    Groups
    Groupwork
    Guidance
    Guilt
    Habit
    Healing
    Health
    Hear
    Heidegger
    Hermeneutics
    Hero
    Hierarchy
    History
    Holistic
    Holy Spirit
    Home
    Homeless
    Homelessness
    Honesty
    Hope
    Hopelessness
    Hubris
    Human
    Human Givens
    Humanitarian
    Humanity
    Human Resources
    Human Rights
    Humility
    Humour
    Hybrid
    Hypotheses
    Hypothesis
    Icon
    Idealising
    Ideas
    Ideation
    Identity
    Ideology
    Image
    Imagination
    Immersion
    Immigration
    Impact
    Impostor
    Improvisation
    Incarnation
    Inclusion
    Independence
    Influence
    Influences
    Influencing
    INGO
    Initiative
    Injustice
    Innovation
    Inquiry
    Insecurity
    Insight
    Inspiration
    Instinct
    Integrity
    Intention
    Intercultural
    Interdependence
    Interference
    International
    Interpretation
    Intersectionality
    Intimacy
    Introjection
    Introversion
    Intuition
    Invisible
    Invitation
    Iran
    Irrationality
    Israel
    Jargon
    Jesus
    Jolt
    Journey
    Joy
    Judgements
    Jungle
    Justice
    Keys
    Kindness
    Knowing
    Knowledge
    Labels
    Language
    Lateral Thinking
    Leader
    Leadership
    Leadership Teams
    Learner
    Learning
    Legacy
    Lent
    Lesson
    Liberal
    Life
    Light
    Linguistic
    Listening
    Logic
    Loss
    Love
    Management
    Manager
    Manipulation
    Marathon
    Marginalisation
    Marketing
    Martin Luther King
    Matrix
    Mbti
    Meaning
    Media
    Mediation
    Meditation
    Meetings
    Memory
    Mental Health
    Mentoring
    Merit
    Metaphor
    Metaphysic
    Metaphysics
    Mindfulness
    Miracle
    Mirror
    Mirroring
    Misfit
    Mission
    Mode
    Montessori
    Morality
    Motivation
    Music
    Mystery
    Narrative
    Nationalism
    Nativity
    Nazis
    Need
    Negotiation
    Neo-Nazi
    Networking
    News
    New Year
    Norm
    Norms
    Noticing
    Online
    Operations
    Opportunity
    Oppression
    Options
    Organisation
    Organisation Develoment
    Organisation Development
    Orientation
    Origin
    Outcome
    Pace
    Pain
    Palestinian
    Panic
    Paradigm
    Paradox
    Parent
    Partnership
    Passion
    Pastoral
    Pastoral Care
    Pattern Matching
    Patterns
    Peace
    People
    Perception
    Perfectionism
    Performance
    Perseverance
    Personal Constructs
    Personal Leadership
    Person Centred
    Perspective
    Persuasion
    Phenomenology
    Phenomenon
    Philippines
    Philosophy
    Physical
    Physicality
    Place
    Plan
    Plane
    Plans
    Plato
    Play
    Plot
    Polarity
    Policy
    Politics
    Poor
    Positive
    Positive Psychology
    Posture
    Potential
    Potential#
    Poverty
    Power
    Powerlessness
    Practice
    Pragmatism
    Praxis
    Prayer
    Preference
    Preferences
    Prepare
    Presence
    Presentation
    Principles
    Priorities
    Priority
    Privilege
    Proactive
    Proactivity
    Problem Solving
    Procedure
    Process
    Prodigal
    Professional
    Profit
    Progressive
    Projection
    Projects
    Prompt
    Propaganda
    Protection
    Protest
    Providence
    Provocative
    Psychoanalysis
    Psychodynamic
    Psychodynamics
    Psychology
    Psychometrics
    Psychotherapy
    Purpose
    Pushback
    Quality
    Quest
    Question
    Questions
    Race
    Radical
    Rainbow
    Rational
    Rationale
    Rationalisation
    Rationality
    Ratlonality
    Realisation
    Reality
    Reason
    Reasoning
    Reconciiliation
    Reconciliation
    Recruitment
    Reflect
    Reflection
    Reflective Practice
    Reflexivity
    Reframing
    Refugee
    Refugees
    Relationship
    Relationships
    Release
    Relief
    Religion
    Representation
    Rescue
    Research
    Resilience
    Resistance
    Resonance
    Resourcefulness
    Respect
    Responsibility
    Responsive
    Responsiveness
    Retreat
    Revelation
    Reward
    Rich
    Rights
    Riot
    Risk
    Role
    Role Model
    Roman Catholic
    Rosabeth Moss-kanter
    Rules
    Russia
    Sabbath
    Sacred
    Safeguarding
    Safety
    Salvation
    Satire
    Satnav
    Saviour
    Scepticism
    Schemata
    School
    Science
    Secure Base
    Security
    See
    Selection
    Selective Attention
    Self
    Self-deception
    Self-sacrifice
    Sense Making
    Sense-making
    Senses
    Sensitivity
    Serendipity
    Servant
    Shadow
    Shock
    Significance
    Silence
    Simplicity
    Sin
    Skills
    Skin Colour
    Snake
    Social Change
    Social Construct
    Social Construction
    Social Constructionism
    Social Constructs
    Social Enterprise
    Social Entrepreneurship
    Social Media
    Social Psychology
    Sociology
    Socrates
    Solution Focused
    Solutions
    Solutions Focus
    Solutions-focus
    Somalia
    Song
    South Sudan
    Space
    Speak
    Speech
    Speed
    Spirit
    Spiritual
    Spirituality
    Stance
    Status
    Stealth
    Stereotype
    Stereotypes
    Stereotyping
    St Francis
    Stimulus
    Storm
    Story
    Strategic
    Strategy
    Strengths
    Stress
    Stretch
    Structure
    Struggle
    Stuck
    Student
    Style
    Subconscious
    Subjectivity
    Success
    Sudan
    Suffering
    Supervision
    Support
    Survival
    Sustainability
    Symbol
    Symbolism
    Symbols
    Synergy
    Systems
    Systems Thinking
    TA
    Tactical
    Tactics
    Talent
    Teacher
    Teaching
    Team
    Team Meeting
    Teams
    Teamwork
    Teamworking
    Technology
    Teenage
    Tension
    Theology
    Theory
    Therapy
    Thinking
    Thought
    Time
    Touch
    Toys
    Traction
    Trade
    Trade Union
    Tradition
    Training
    Transactional Analysis
    Transference
    Transformation
    Transition
    Transitional Object
    Trauma
    Trends
    Trust
    Truth
    Turbulence
    Type
    Ubuntu
    Ukraine
    Uncertainty
    Unexpected
    United Nations
    Use Of Self
    Valentine
    Vallues
    Value
    Valued
    Values
    Vicious Cycle
    Violence
    Virtuous Cycle
    Visibility
    Visible
    Vision
    Vocation
    Voice
    Voting
    VUCA
    Vulnerability
    Vulnerable
    Waiting
    Walls
    War
    Warning
    Wealth
    Weird
    Wellbeing
    Will
    Willingness
    Window
    Wisdom
    Witness
    Women
    Wonder
    Words
    World
    Worth
    Youth
    Zero-sum
    Zoom

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Testimonials
  • Articles
    • Organisations and leadership
    • Learning and development
    • Coaching and counselling
  • Blog
  • e-Resources
  • News
  • Contact