NICK WRIGHT
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Testimonials
  • Articles
    • Organisations and leadership
    • Learning and development
    • Coaching and counselling
  • Blog
  • e-Resources
  • News
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Testimonials
  • Articles
    • Organisations and leadership
    • Learning and development
    • Coaching and counselling
  • Blog
  • e-Resources
  • News
  • Contact

Revealing the matrix

28/1/2013

24 Comments

 
‘Unfortunately, no one can be told what the matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.’ (Morpheus, The Matrix. 1999)

The concept of matrix in organisations has been around for some time now but what does it look like in practice? Some describe it as collaborative working across functional boundaries. Some describe it as dual reporting relationships with a hard line to a functional lead and a dotted line to a project lead. Some describe it as a network of multiple reporting relationships, each with equal authority.

What has your experience of matrix been? How has it worked in practice? What has it felt like for those involved? What has it called for in terms of new styles of leadership, team working and personal effectiveness? What new culture, attitudes, approaches and skills has it required? What tensions has it created and how have you navigated them? What has most influenced its success?

If you were to offer three lines of advice on this topic, what would they be? I would love to hear your thoughts!

24 Comments
Fred Nickols link
28/1/2013 04:57:10 am

I worked in a matrix organization for 12 years. It is basically a means of sharing resources. Too much fuss is made about dual reporting relationships. It's no different than a consulting firm with multiple clients. The one where I was employed worked very well. As for three lines of advice, try these:

1. Your boss is your boss.
2. Your clients are your clients.
3. Don't confuse the two.

Reply
Nick Wright
28/1/2013 10:14:08 am

Hi Fred and thanks for the note. I liked your succinct advice and found the analogy of a consulting firm with multiple clients helpful. With best wishes. Nick

Reply
Florence Dambricourt
28/1/2013 07:43:19 am

Sometimes the art of using new words and expression to keep us thinking and working :-)

Reply
Nick Wright
28/1/2013 10:16:12 am

Hi Florence and thanks for the comment. Could you say more about what you had in mind? With best wishes. Nick

Reply
Bob McQueen
28/1/2013 09:25:58 am

I have experience managing on both side of the Matrix i.e. Project and Functional. The key question to ask and answer is “who is managing who?” and “what does this management involve?”.
My View is that no matter what your answer is you are thinking within a Management Paradigm from an age that should have passed. Processes deliver outputs and it is the process that needs to be managed. It is my view that the people who are doing the work need the knowledge, skills, attitude and information so they can use a “self-organizing” management approach. Facilitating this, monitoring progress and resolving issues the process team needs help with is the role of both Project and Functional management.
Why is the day to day management of “keeping things going” using a self-organizing approach a challenging to achieve. I leave the answer to you. However when it is achieved it enables manages to have the space to conceive and achieve “new things”

Reply
Nick Wright
28/1/2013 10:20:26 am

Hi Bob and thanks for the note. It sounds like the approach you are describing involves self-managing teams with project or functional managers being available to oversee, resource, facilitate, problem-solve etc. if the teams encounter issues or difficulties they are unable to resolve for themselves. Have I understood you correctly? With thanks and best wishes. Nick

Reply
Ian Gray
28/1/2013 10:45:58 am

The key thing I have found is to get the approach and agreements in place up front (using a RASCI or other model). The key to the success has been that this process clarifies expectations and understanding between the different parties, not to have a document to hit each other over the head with. Having done this, I have not had to go back to them again. As some of the other posts have commented, clarity is key.

Reply
Nick Wright
28/1/2013 10:55:58 am

Hi Ian and thanks for the note. I like your emphasis on working to reach clarity, shared understanding and agreement between parties from the outset rather than simply relying on formal documentation. As you say, it clarifies expectations and releases the parties from risks of interference and micromanagement. With best wishes. Nick

Reply
Bob McQueen
28/1/2013 10:53:17 am

Hi Nick
You are on track. I have worked in Silicon Valley for many years as an engineering functional and project manager. For the past 20 years I have had the privilege of consulting and teaching in the performance improvement area. Companies I have worked with include Intel, HP, Cisco, Apple and Applied Materials. My consulting company has a counterpart in the UK The Organizational Learning Centre Europe.
All companies are trying to figuring out have best to compete and thus how best to manage their resources. The approach I described is my view on how to achieve high performance. The challenge is to understand the “soft capabilities” that underlie achieving high performance and then how to measure and build these capabilities throughout the organization. The “end in mind” is to establish a process management/partnership organization which manages daily work using self-organizing teams. Transforming a top down traditionally managed organization to a process based partnership organization is no easy chore. My view is that Traditionally Managed organizations that fail to make this transition are unlikely to survive in today’s increasingly competitive market place

Reply
Nick Wright
28/1/2013 11:03:14 am

Hi Bob and thanks for the note. It sounds like you have a lot of valuable experience in this area. Are you saying you would identify soft capabilities that support effective self-management within and between teams? Do you have any examples?

Also, would you be happy to share any examples of what a 'process management/partnership organisation' would be characterised by and doing in practice in contrast to a traditionally managed organisation? With thanks and best wishes. Nick

Reply
Robert Crosby
29/1/2013 11:17:57 am

My book, "Solving the Cross-work Puzzle" is about Matrix Management. We will soon publish an instrument with 42 questions which measure matrixed work including project mg'ment and product development. I could send you the first 10 Q's by Email.

Reply
Nick Wright
29/1/2013 11:19:45 am

Hi Robert and thanks for your kind offer. I'd very much like to see the questions. My email address is info@nick-wright.com. With thanks and best wishes. Nick

Reply
Cyril Dunworth
29/1/2013 11:18:41 am

My esteemed colleagues at T-Space penned a piece called Mastering the Matrix which can be seen here http://ebookbrowse.com/mastering-the-matrix-doc-d219187240

Reply
Nick Wright
29/1/2013 11:26:03 am

Hi Cyril and many thanks for sharing the link to 'Mastering the Matrix'. I've just had a quick glance at the paper and it looks very helpful. With best wishes. Nick

Reply
Hilary Lines
30/1/2013 05:04:16 am

Hi Nick, thanks for your questions - it is a fascinating area. Much of my experience has been with coaching leaders in professional services businesses - and I have seen many instances where value has been lost because of the polarisation that inevitably occurs between the axes of the matrix. One of the core principles of effective leadership in complex organisations, in my view, is the ability to hold the space for creative tension at the polarity. This requires the individual leader to be 1) Aware of how they can engender creativity, how they might stop it, 2) Mentally and emotionally open to those whose goals run counter to their own, and 3) Willing to learn and grow from creative connection across the points of polarity and paradox. These ideas are developed in my book, about to be published, called, 'Touchpoint Leadership: creating collaborative energy across teams and organisation'. If you, or anyone, would like a copy of the Introductory chapter, I would be happy to send to you. hilary.lines@touchpointleaders.com

Reply
Nick Wright
30/1/2013 11:26:23 am

Hi Hilary and thanks for sharing such thoughtful comments. I really like the three conditions you described for effective leadership within a matrix environment. It reminded me of some of the ideas in Liz Wiseman’s book, ‘Multipliers’ (2010). I’d certainly be very interested to receive a copy of the introductory chapter from your new book so will send you an email. With best wishes. Nick

Reply
Benson Agoha MIPA
30/1/2013 04:53:17 pm

Nick, the concept of the Matrix Organisation has never been one for easy discussion. Yet it in practice and working. Actually, in reality, every `environment', whether it is business, educational, political, social, economic and even religious environment, has a matrix of a sort to it - and the challenge for us all is to analyize it, discover the void for you to fill and recognize when it is being encroached upon, ensuring that, clashes are avoided and that lines of inter-relationships are not just adherred to but also respected.

The matrix organisation can easily be described when we view the working partnership within a University system that operates a seperated, but associated open-learning faculty. Despite inter-departmental exchanges and co-operations, lines and boundaries are known, recognised and respected, avoiding clashes and breakdown of the system.

Reply
Nick Wright
30/1/2013 04:57:28 pm

Hi Benson and thanks for the note. It sounds like you are saying it's important to recognise the matrix as an organisational system, to make the system explicit and to ensure that boundaries and communication lines are clear and respected. That's good advice. With best wishes. Nick

Reply
Steve Wood
31/1/2013 01:40:14 am

In so many of these situations, I feel we adopt frameworks and organisational models and miss the all important (and often time consuming) task of creating teams. This is the all important process in my experience - the taking of a bunch of individuals with different roles, responsibilities, ways of working and objectives and turning them into a team who share a common goal and will move heaven and earth to achieve it. Of course that needs to be supported by strong project or matrix management models but that's exactly what they are - a support. Get it right and you'll have strong levels of trust and accountability whilst still leaving room for strategic and creative tension, even conflict at times. But it's the creation and holding together of that team which will always, in my experience, be the difference between success and failure.

Reply
Nick Wright
31/1/2013 09:14:46 am

Hi Steve and thanks for sharing such inspiring insights. Your emphasis on team development certainly resonates with my own experience of working in cross-functional project teams. Where investment has been made in team relationships and shared understanding up front and on route, especially where team members didn’t know each other or hadn’t worked together in this way previously, it has made a significant difference in terms of e.g. energy, trust, robust conversations, creativity and collaborative working. Conversely, when teams have leapt straight into task mode, they have spent significantly more time subsequently on fire fighting and problem-solving issues within the team, especially when faced with pressured deadlines or other challenges that can create stress. With best wishes. Nick

Reply
Benson Agoha MIPA
1/2/2013 09:09:42 pm

The matrix is a complex organisational arrangement and in fact, most conglomerates with self-accounting associate businesses are matrix oriented. Though each group would have its ceo and his subordinates, when lines of communication cross or when a department from one organisation has dealings with the next, it is often necessary that each head recognizes when to play the follower.

In my earlier post, I sighted the University system where, one academic might find himself playing student to another lecturer much junior to him in the overall organisational structure. Yet, for that purpose and at that point in time, he has to play the follower.

What do you think Nick?

Reply
Nick Wright
1/2/2013 09:39:07 pm

Hi Benson and thanks for the additional comments. I found your comments on leadership and followership helpful. It brings 'job' (e.g. functional expertise) and role (e.g. leader or follower) into the same frame, with the latter depending on specific initiatives (e.g. projects or programmes).

It raises interesting questions about, for instance, (a) what leadership and teamworking attitudes, mindsets and abilities are required to make this fluid way of working successful and (b) how, where and by whom conflicts for resources are addressed and resolved.

If different programmes want to draw on the same people or other critical resources at the same time, where, how and by whom in your experience are such conflicts resolved: e.g. by leadership at a macro-organisational level or by managers/practitioners at a local level...or both?

The former would require a very clear, shared view of organisational priorities and timeframes at a senior leadership level and a willingness to collaborate to achieve them; the latter would require clarity about organsational priorities, delegated authority and good influencing and negotiating skills at a local level.

I would be interested to hear any examples of how you've seen this work out in practice, e.g. in the university context. What happened, what were the underlying issues, how were they addressed, what happened as a result etc. With best wishes. Nick

Reply
Benson Agoha MIPA
5/2/2013 11:39:59 am

It certainly does. Large organisations with multiple projects often have matrix structures. There, we find combination of both product and functional structures and the use of teams of employees. And as you pointed out, we resources to serve competing crossroads, different challenges usually arise.

Unfortunately, I am a little tonguetied and won't mention specific organisations here. Still the University environment provides a lot of insight into understanding the matrix structure, with academic staff having to serve or teach in different departments across different faculties. Indeed, as in every organisations conflicts do occure. And resolutions often stem from analysing it from each micro-setup in context with the macro one.

It is not uncommon for meetings to be summoned for resolution conflicts and as I suggested earlier on, the easier method is for everyone to be fully aware of his position first within his micro environment and, contextually speaking, also at the macro level. There again, there might exist an established code of conduct or ethics of particularly professions, all of which are sometimes reasons for conflicts. Resolutions also will take these into account.

Statements like "Don't forget you are talking to the Assistant Manager" and a challenging respose like "Don't forget you are talking to a Medical Doctor" are positions whose resolution may have to be handled at the macro level.

When emphases on hierarchy are nullified by established code or ethics or specific fields, hardline positions may be rife, but in the end objective reason takes eminence.

William (Doc) Holiday
5/2/2013 11:40:59 am

Priorities!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    ​Nick Wright

    ​I'm a psychological coach, trainer and OD consultant. Curious to discover how can I help you? ​Get in touch!

    Picture
    Like what you read? Simply enter your email address below to receive regular blog updates!
    Subscribe to Blog
    Picture
    Picture


    ​Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011

    Categories

    All
    Abc
    Ability
    Accountability
    Achievement
    Act
    Action
    Action Learning
    Activism
    Adaptability
    Adaptive
    Advent
    Adventure
    Africa
    Agency
    Agile
    Ambiguity
    Angle
    Anticipation
    Anxiety
    Appraisal
    Appreciation
    Appreciative
    Appreciative Inquiry
    Approach
    Argyris
    Asia
    Assumption
    Assumptions
    Asylum
    Attachment
    Attention
    Attitude
    Audience
    Authenticity
    Authority
    Autonomy
    Avoidance
    Awareness
    Behaviour
    Being
    Belief
    Beliefs
    Bias
    Bible
    Body Language
    Boundaries
    Brainstorming
    Brand
    Calling
    Care
    Career
    Censorship
    Challenge
    Change
    Character
    Charity
    Child
    Choice
    Choose
    Christ
    Christian
    Christmas
    Clarity
    Client
    Climate
    Coach
    Coaching
    Coactive
    Cognition
    Cognitive
    Cognitive Behavioural
    Commitment
    Communication
    Community
    Compassion
    Competence
    Competencies
    Complexity
    Concepts
    Conflict
    Confluence
    Congruence
    Consciousness
    Construct
    Constructs
    Construe
    Consultancy
    Contact
    Content
    Context
    Contracting
    Contribution
    Control
    Conversation
    Corruption
    Counselling
    Counterintiution
    Counterintuition
    Countertransference
    Courage
    Craziness
    Creativity
    Credibility
    Crisis
    Critical Consciousness
    Critical Reflection
    Critical Reflective Practice
    Critical Reflexivity
    Critical Thinking
    Critique
    Cross
    Cross Culture
    Cross-culture
    Culture
    Curiosity
    Customer Care
    Customers
    Customer Service
    Death
    Deception
    Decision
    Deconstruction
    Defence
    Defences
    Deferred Gratification
    Definition
    Delusion
    Democracy
    Depression
    Determination
    Development
    Deviance
    Deviant
    Diagnosis
    Disaster
    Discernment
    Disclosure
    Discovery
    Discrimination
    Disruptive
    Dissent
    Dissident
    Dissonance
    Distinctiveness
    Distortion
    Diversity
    Dream
    Dynamic
    Dynamics
    Easter
    Ecology
    Edge
    Edi
    Education
    Effectiveness
    Efficiency
    Ego State
    Eliciting
    Emergence
    Emotion
    Emotional
    Emotional Intelligence
    Empathy
    Empowerment
    Encouragement
    Energy
    Engagement
    Environment
    Equality
    Eternity
    Ethics
    Ethiopia
    Evaluation
    Evidence
    Evocative
    Existential
    Existentialism
    Expectation
    Expectations
    Experience
    Experiment
    Experimentation
    Exploration
    Explore
    Exposure
    Facilitation
    Faith
    Fear
    Feedback
    Feeling
    Feminism
    Figure
    Filter
    Fit
    Flashback
    Focus
    Forgiveness
    Framework
    Freedom
    Freud
    Fun
    Future
    Gender
    Geopolitical
    Geopolitics
    Gestalt
    Global
    Goal
    Goals
    God
    Gospel
    Grace
    Grief
    Grit
    Ground
    Group
    Guidance
    Healing
    Health
    Hear
    Heidegger
    Hero
    Hope
    Human
    Human Givens
    Humanity
    Human Resources
    Human Rights
    Humility
    Humour
    Hybrid
    Hypotheses
    Hypothesis
    Icon
    Ideation
    Identity
    Image
    Imagination
    Impact
    Impostor
    Inclusion
    Independence
    Influence
    INGO
    Initiative
    Injustice
    Innovation
    Inquiry
    Insecurity
    Insight
    Inspiration
    Instinct
    Integrity
    Intention
    Interdependence
    Interference
    International
    Interpretation
    Intimacy
    Introversion
    Intuition
    Invisible
    Jargon
    Jesus
    Journey
    Jungle
    Justice
    Keys
    Knowing
    Knowledge
    Labels
    Language
    Lateral Thinking
    Leader
    Leadership
    Learning
    Lesson
    Liberal
    Life
    Light
    Listening
    Logic
    Loss
    Love
    Management
    Manager
    Marathon
    Matrix
    Mbti
    Meaning
    Media
    Mediation
    Meetings
    Memory
    Mentoring
    Merit
    Metaphor
    Metaphysic
    Mindfulness
    Miracle
    Mirroring
    Misfit
    Mission
    Mode
    Morality
    Motivation
    Mystery
    Narrative
    Nazis
    Need
    Negotiation
    Neo-Nazi
    Networking
    News
    New Year
    Norm
    Norms
    Noticing
    Online
    Operations
    Opportunity
    Oppression
    Organisation
    Organisation Develoment
    Organisation Development
    Origin
    Pace
    Panic
    Paradigm
    Paradox
    Partnership
    Passion
    Pastoral
    Pattern Matching
    Peace
    People
    Perception
    Perfectionism
    Performance
    Perseverance
    Personal Constructs
    Personal Leadership
    Person Centred
    Perspective
    Phenomenology
    Phenomenon
    Philippines
    Philosophy
    Physicality
    Plan
    Plans
    Plato
    Play
    Plot
    Polarity
    Policy
    Politics
    Poor
    Positive
    Positive Psychology
    Posture
    Potential
    Potential#
    Poverty
    Power
    Practice
    Pragmatism
    Praxis
    Prayer
    Preference
    Preferences
    Prepare
    Presence
    Principles
    Priorities
    Priority
    Privilege
    Proactivity
    Problem Solving
    Process
    Professional
    Progressive
    Projection
    Projects
    Prompt
    Propaganda
    Protection
    Protest
    Providence
    Provocative
    Psychoanalysis
    Psychodynamic
    Psychodynamics
    Psychology
    Psychometrics
    Psychotherapy
    Purpose
    Quality
    Questions
    Race
    Radical
    Rational
    Rationale
    Rationalisation
    Rationality
    Reality
    Reason
    Reasoning
    Reconciliation
    Recruitment
    Reflect
    Reflection
    Reflective Practice
    Reflexivity
    Reframing
    Refugee
    Refugees
    Relationship
    Relationships
    Release
    Religion
    Representation
    Rescue
    Research
    Resilience
    Resonance
    Resourcefulness
    Responsibility
    Responsive
    Responsiveness
    Revelation
    Reward
    Rights
    Risk
    Role
    Role Model
    Rosabeth Moss-kanter
    Rules
    Sabbath
    Satire
    Satnav
    Saviour
    Schemata
    School
    Science
    Secure Base
    Security
    See
    Selection
    Selective Attention
    Self
    Sense Making
    Senses
    Sensitivity
    Serendipity
    Servant
    Shadow
    Significance
    Silence
    Sin
    Skills
    Social Construct
    Social Construction
    Social Constructionism
    Social Media
    Social Psychology
    Socrates
    Solution Focused
    Solutions
    Solutions Focus
    Solutions-focus
    Space
    Speed
    Spirit
    Spirituality
    Stance
    Stealth
    Stereotype
    Stereotypes
    Story
    Strategic
    Strategy
    Strengths
    Stress
    Stretch
    Structure
    Struggle
    Stuck
    Style
    Subconscious
    Subjectivity
    Success
    Suffering
    Supervision
    Support
    Survival
    Sustainability
    Symbol
    Symbolism
    Systems
    Systems Thinking
    TA
    Tactical
    Tactics
    Talent
    Teaching
    Team
    Teamwork
    Teenage
    Theology
    Theory
    Therapy
    Thinking
    Thought
    Time
    Touch
    Toys
    Traction
    Trade
    Tradition
    Training
    Transactional Analysis
    Transference
    Transformation
    Transition
    Transitional Object
    Trauma
    Trust
    Truth
    Uncertainty
    Unexpected
    Vallues
    Value
    Values
    Violence
    Visibility
    Vision
    Voice
    VUCA
    Vulnerability
    Vulnerable
    Waiting
    War
    Wealth
    Weird
    Wellbeing
    Will
    Willingness
    Window
    Wisdom
    Wonder
    Words
    World
    Worth
    Youth
    Zoom

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Testimonials
  • Articles
    • Organisations and leadership
    • Learning and development
    • Coaching and counselling
  • Blog
  • e-Resources
  • News
  • Contact