I wrote a blog back in March called, ‘Goal, content, process and relationship’, based on coaching I was doing at the time with leadership teams. I’ve used and adapted this model since with various teams and have noticed some interesting results.
Firstly, some people found the word ‘process’ confusing because, in their cultural framework, it suggested formal business processes rather than creative methods (e.g. within a team meeting) that could work best for the people in the room. I now use the word ‘method’ instead. Secondly, some teams found it helpful to substitute ‘why’ for goal, ‘what’ for content, ‘how’ for process and ‘who’ for relationship. This enabled them to include e.g. ‘vision’ under why, ‘activities’ under what, ‘processes’ under how and ‘behaviours’ under who. Thirdly, some teams have found it useful to highlight warning signs against each of the model’s 4 dimensions, indicating what to look out for as red flags. Against ‘goal’ I write ‘dulled’, against content, ‘distracted’, against method, ‘disengaged’ and against people, ‘dismissed’. The most striking observation for me has been how the model seems to easy in principle and yet so difficult to apply and sustain. This is because teams, like individuals, can struggle to break away from embedded preoccupations, patterns of behaviour and ways of working. In light of this, I’ve found it useful to encourage teams to pause and notice their own behaviour, reflect honestly on what is influencing their choices, challenge themselves when they are drifting off track and be willing to face and address underlying dynamics. If you have tried using this, contrasting or similar models in team development and coaching, I would be very interested to hear from you, e.g. what you have done, how you have applied it, what kind of response you got and what happened as a result.
120 Comments
Dan Pegler
28/11/2014 07:48:14 am
Thanks Nick - substituting ‘why’ for goal, ‘what’ for content, ‘how’ for process and ‘who’ for relationship definitely helps me!
Reply
Nick Wright
29/11/2014 08:35:18 am
Hi Dan. Thank you...that's helpful feedback! With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Alain Cardon MCC
29/11/2014 08:30:56 am
Not really a model. More of a systemic frame of reference with a number of accompanying processes. Many of these processes are described in my book on team and organizational coaching: http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&page=1&rh=n%3A133140011%2Cp_27%3AAlain%20CARDON%20MCC
Reply
Nick Wright
29/11/2014 08:34:33 am
Hi Alain. Thanks for the note and the link to the book. Would you be willing to share some of the processes that you have included in the book? With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Alain Cardon MCC
29/11/2014 01:32:58 pm
One of them is to work with how the team's seating order in the meeting room expresses its underlying relational architecture, such as coalitions, oppositions, clans, symetrry, etc. All this by the use of coaching questions. Just an example.
Nick Wright
29/11/2014 01:33:54 pm
Sounds intriguing, Alain. I look forward to having a look at your book! With best wishes. Nick
Bob Larcher
29/11/2014 01:25:24 pm
I tend to use my own model (still in a somewhat "embryonic" state) based on 3 roles:
Reply
Nick Wright
29/11/2014 01:31:17 pm
Hi Bob and thanks for sharing your embryonic model. I think I can understand what working 'with' and 'through' could look like. Could you say a little more about what working 'at' means? With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Bob Larcher
30/11/2014 03:23:08 am
This is how I describe it:
Nachum Katz
30/11/2014 03:25:25 am
Nick, thanks for this discussion. I am looking forward to read more. Alain, thank you too. I watched several of your videos and heard a lot about you from Ciprian Trandafirescu. Cheers!
Reply
Nick Wright
30/11/2014 03:27:14 am
Thanks Nachum. Me too! I'd be interested to hear any insights you may have from your own experience of working with teams. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Nachum Katz
1/12/2014 01:48:11 am
I am not sure if it is a model, but I found that focusing in a way to thank people based on KEAS (specific appreciation for Knowledge, Emotion, Attitude and Skills, insted of cheerleading or grumbling about the past) brings extremely unexpected positive results when coahing a team, for example.
Errol Benvie
30/11/2014 03:30:04 am
Nick, take a look at the work of David Clutterbuck. He says team and group work is NOT an extrapolation of individual coaching with good facilitation. Group coaching is a different and complex emergent practice drawing further on social psychology than OD does. Coaches do well with an appreciation of areas such as social constructivism to work with meaning making and sense making in teams and groups.
Reply
Nick Wright
30/11/2014 03:34:06 am
Hi Errol and thanks for the note. Yes, I agree that insights from social psychology and, in my case, social constructionism help when working with teams in this way. Did you have any particular work by David Clutterbuck in mind? Interestingly, I've just been looking at a course David Clutterbuck will be running in the new year with PB Coaching in Leeds, England (http://www.pbcoaching.com/coach-education/team-coaching/?gclid=CN_w892dosICFWf3wgodeikAmw). With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Paul O Olson
30/11/2014 03:37:46 am
Yes Nick, I'm not surprised that you find this works and the direction you're going is sound enough. I showed a similar model at the EMCC 21st Annual Conference in Venice, on a circumplex based upon the Five-factor Model and Holland's RIASEC Interest codes. However, this is just a platform because structure isn't nearly enough to predict behaviours. I then showed glimpses of social psychology and modern group psychology. I therefore totally agree with Clutterbuck and others (like Errol) that group coaching (and also executive coaching) is different from coaching individuals.
Reply
Nick Wright
30/11/2014 03:55:14 am
Hi Paul and thanks for your thoughtful response. In my experience, coaching teams is both similar to and different to coaching individuals.
Reply
Paul O Olson
30/11/2014 06:30:20 am
domains
Felicity O'Hanlon
30/11/2014 03:48:44 am
Hi Nick, an interesting discussion you started here, the feedback from Errol and Paul is valuable. I haven't coached teams but from a social psychological viewpoint in my MSc course we recently looked at research on the effects of a variety of bias on assessment centre group discussions which often are the deciding factor in candidates' employment. So it would seem as the others say, that group dynamics need different skills and insights. From a psychodynamic point of view, the dynamics of a group or team can present a transference situation for some individual to either negative or positive family experiences. Not necessarily relevant in a business setting but perhaps another dimension to be aware of as in reality transference as a powerful subconscious force does not always respect the boundaries between the public and private spheres of life. This might seem slightly off topic but is an interest of mine, the intersection between coaching and counselling.
Reply
Nick Wright
30/11/2014 04:01:13 am
Hi Felicity and thanks for sharing such stimulating insights (as usual!). I find the psychodynamic frame useful when working with teams and I agree with you that team environments and experiences can evoke transference from previous 'team' or 'group' environments and experiences such as family. In one team, I poured a bag of toy figures I'd collected on the table and invited team members to choose and configure figures that represented their own family as a child. I then invited people to share what they had created and to notice any resonances with positions, roles and dynamics in this team. It takes a high degree of openness and trust between team members to engage in this kind of activity but its effects can be both revealing and transformational. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Felicity O'Hanlon
30/11/2014 06:32:17 am
Hi Nick, you are kind, I always enjoy reading your blogs, they are informative and start productive discussions. Thanks for sharing the coaching exercise you did, how interesting. And sounds like you managed the boundaries of what was discussed really well, so containing the degree of disclosure with relevance to work role. And and you say would probably work better in an established cohesive team.
Paul O Olson
30/11/2014 04:02:43 am
Hi Felicity - good insights and thank you for using the term 'subconscious'. For me the concept of transference is real and useful - emotional intelligence is mostly subconscious associations that our consciousness (thinking) then plays with. All intuition works this way so there is neuro evidence behind transference, counter-transference and by extension also the concept of parallel processes when you interpret it as schemata. Unfortunately the psychodynamic heritage is not really intersubjective as it works instead with introjected social objects. It was designed for psychopathology, in fact it is far more psycho-analytic than psycho-dynamic...so yes we need to take social psychology into account.
Reply
Felicity O'Hanlon
30/11/2014 04:03:38 am
Hi Paul, you are right to make that clarification with reference to introjection, transference and counter transference need to be worked with on an individual basis and so realistically could not be part of a team process. I like to consider both the individual and social psychological context together but the implications for practice and working models in a team coaching setting are not realistic.
Antonia Russo Comer
30/11/2014 02:17:04 pm
I really like your model. Thanks for sharing!
Reply
Nick Wright
30/11/2014 02:18:14 pm
Thanks for such encouraging feedback, Antonia. Let me know what happens if you try using it? With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Chris Crosby
1/12/2014 01:42:44 am
The book "Walking the Empowerment Tightrope" is about improving a team using action research. It was written by Robert Crosby who had a twenty year mentorship with Ronald Lippett, Kurt Lewin's top graduate student. It is based on a survey that was developed and given to over 500 companies. And was developed through learning while working inside of business, so its focus is on how to reach business goals while developing an organization. Finally, it is put together with an eye on systems thinking rather than individual thinking so it helps improve all aspects of the workplace. It is foundational to any practice that includes working with intact work teams.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 05:20:16 am
Hi Chris and thanks for the reference to Robert Crosby's book. Peter Hawkins' book 'Leadership Team Coaching' (2014) and Christine Thornton's 'Group and Team Coaching' (2010) are also worth a glance for a systems approach. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Celeste Tramonte
1/12/2014 01:44:51 am
Hi Nick, if you are interested in reading Clutterbuck on team coaching then his book Coaching the Team at Work might be a starting point. If you want something more succinct he has a chapter on this in The Complete Handbook of Coaching (Bachkirova, Cox & Clutterbuck, eds.). I also think family therapy can be useful in team coaching...happy reading!
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 05:23:06 am
Hi Celeste and thanks for the note. Yes, I have copies of both the books you mentioned and would support your recommendation of them to others too. :) I like your comment on family therapy as I've noticed that team environments can sometimes evoke transference from family environments. Did you have a particular book in mind on that front? With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Celeste Tramonte
20/12/2014 03:15:41 am
Hi Nick,
Nick Wright
20/12/2014 03:20:06 am
Hi Celeste and thank you for such helpful pointers. I have some good material on brief therapy/solutions-focused coaching and you have inspired me to revisit them! The Family Ties That Bind book sounds familiar too - I will check it out. I will also have a look at the LinkedIn article you mention. With many thanks and best wishes. Nick
Errol Benvie
1/12/2014 01:46:04 am
Paul noted earlier that the coach is not the centre of attention and that greater experience is needed to interpret what is going on. I feel this is rich ground for thought.
Reply
Paul O Olson
1/12/2014 02:18:45 am
Right on, Errol: "These questions don't have clear parallels with either individual or group clinical practice". As coaches we will be drawn into some kind of leadership and we need to be good at withdrawing from this position. In a coaching session we don't really withdraw and let the coachee alone, what we do is shut up but we are still very obviously there.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 05:29:56 am
Hi Paul and thanks for your interesting comments. I was struck by your observation that, 'As coaches we will be drawn into some kind of leadership'. I've noticed in my own coaching practice with leadership teams that sometimes the formal leader of the team fades back as participant and leaves me to lead the process. In light of this, I'm learning to contract around roles and dynamics more explicitly with the leader and team beforehand and use the experience of what I and others in the team experience as we work together as material to reflect back and work on. Would be interested to hear more about your own experiences in this respect and how you have learned to handle them. With best wishes. Nick
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 05:26:11 am
Hi Errol and thanks for the note. You raise some interesting questions about the role and ethics of the coach in relation to the team. Did you have any thoughts on how best to address them, perhaps drawing on your own experience and practice? I would be interested to hear more. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Errol Benvie
21/12/2014 05:48:52 am
Hi Nick, take read of this article by Monisha Pasupathi.
Nick Wright
21/12/2014 06:01:18 am
Hi Errol,
Helen Caton-Hughes MA PCC
1/12/2014 01:49:14 am
Not sure what you mean by a 'model' Nick but our team-coach training looks at the overall assignment - what the team is there to do and how well they understand their mission, vision and shared values. Plus the role of the leadership and the wider system in which they operate - their stakeholders and how they communicate well with those people - and with each other. If their mission is a train journey, it's getting everyone on board. If it's a relay race, help everyone understand the key points in the race, and how they contribute. If it's a rowing race it's about the rhythm of dipping the oars into the water at the same time.... Now this may sound very behavioural 'model' but that's within a wider coaching framework of self-awareness agreements and value co-creation...
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 05:38:02 am
Hi Helen and thank you for your note. I liked the different analogies that you presented as different ways of thinking about 'team'. Shifting analogies in this way can help to stimulate, surface and challenge a team to notice what assumptions it is making about itself as a team and what options it could consider for the way forward.
Reply
Margherita Larné-Jones
1/12/2014 02:21:13 am
Hello Nick,
Reply
Errol Benvie
1/12/2014 02:42:55 am
Yes, Hawkins' systemic models are great.
Reply
Paul O Olson
1/12/2014 07:41:17 am
Hawkins & Smith got a new edition of their book last year. If you're interested this is what I wrote on Amazon.co.uk: http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R8ERI1IUSP44X/ref=cm_cr_dp_title?ie=UTF8&ASIN=0335247148&channel=detail-glance&nodeID=266239&store=books
Errol Benvie
19/12/2014 08:01:19 am
Nice note, Paul! I have the 2007 edition but this one looks worth adding.
Paul O Olson
19/12/2014 08:02:10 am
Interesting thoughts there Errol (& thks for feedback, too). It reminds me of Jack Welch and his TPOV - GE was not only a learning organisation but actually a teaching organisation from the top down, too. TPOV = Teachable Point Of View. TPOVs were communicated relentlessly (e.g. customer value, workout, boundarylessness) - lots of psychology + formed a foundation for our freedom to fail, too.
Errol Benvie
19/12/2014 08:03:07 am
Yes, Jack is rich source of ideas. There was a dark side and a bright side of Jack. My own values cause me to be occupied more with the dark side. The word "relentlessly" doing anything in an organisation distracts me too much from what is being done. I like elegance, emergent and mindful. Jack was many things but none of these.
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 05:39:42 am
Hi Margherita and thanks for the note. I've struggled to find a good paper on 'Grow to Group' online. Do you have any links you could point me towards? With thanks and best wishes. Nick
Reply
Margherita Larné-Jones
20/12/2014 03:30:24 am
Hello Nick,
Nick Wright
20/12/2014 03:31:41 am
Hi Margherita and thanks for the note and kind offer to send a copy of the article. I would love to see it. My email address is [email protected]. With thanks - and much appreciated! Nick
Sue Beyer
1/12/2014 11:23:00 am
Hi Nick,
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 05:42:05 am
Hi Sue and thanks for the helpful reference. Yes, I know of a number of coaches and leaders who have found the 'Five Dysfunctions' model and approach very helpful. I'd be very interested to hear about any experiences you have had of using this model with teams - how you approached it and what happened as a result. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Anita Schamber
2/12/2014 02:27:07 am
If you send me an e-mail at anitaschamber@gmail. com, I will send you the model I have.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 05:43:13 am
Many thanks, Anita. I remember meeting you at a change leadership event in Vancouver some years ago! I will be in touch. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Mike Hawkins
2/12/2014 02:28:09 am
I do a lot of team coaching and use the same approach I use for executive 1-on-1 coaching with the exceptions of being more careful with sensitive/confidential information and following best meeting practices such as ensuring everyone participates.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 05:48:07 am
Hi Mike and thanks for sharing the approach you use.
Reply
Kofi Hagan
2/12/2014 04:23:15 am
In addition to ensuring that everybody has an opportunity to make their contribution I ensure time is not planned for enough time. Defining terms carefully and at length is important to get all on the sam page. Finally participant selection must be done with care to be done with care to ensure coachees are on the same wavelength.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 05:50:30 am
Hi Kofi and thanks for your note. Yes, I agree that defining terms etc. in order to ensure that everyone is (as least as far as we can tell) on the same page can be very useful as a coaching intervention. The same applies for surfacing implicit assumptions etc. that are held within the team but rarely acknowledged or spoken about. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Carter McNamara MBA PhD
3/12/2014 02:37:41 am
I suggest you need:
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 05:52:11 am
Thanks for the note, Carter, and for sharing your 7 elements. It sounds like the models/frameworks we use are along similar lines. Do you have any examples of using these 7 elements with a team in practice that you would be willing to share? I would be very interested to hear more. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Dr Wafi Al-Baghdadi
3/12/2014 09:11:08 am
My strategy of working with executives is to find out their values and to proceed accordingly. I have many instruments which I have derived from the classical and modern psychology and NLP. In working with my clients I act and react very flexible and employ the appropriate method using appropriate techniques.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 05:53:28 am
Hi Wafi and thank you for your comments. I would be very interested to hear more about the specific instruments you use. Would you be willing to share some examples? With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Dr Wafi Al-Baghdadi
10/1/2015 02:40:24 pm
Hi Nick. Thanks for your comments; that is exactly what I'm doing in my coaching work espicially in difficult situations.
Gordon Curphy PhD
5/12/2014 03:10:33 am
I have used the Rocket Model (Curphy & Hogan, 2012) and related materials with hundreds of teams over the past ten years.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 05:54:46 am
Hi Gordon. Thanks for the note. Would you be willing to say a bit more about the 'Rocket Model'? With best wishes. Nick
Reply
David Marriott
8/12/2014 01:55:23 am
I have used the Belbin Team Role model since 1988, both in computer form and psychometrically, to prepare individual profiles, team profiles and working relationship reports. A day workshop on the model followed by individual confidential de-briefings the second day. Belbin has three excellent DVD's, which greatly enhance teamwork training.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 05:55:42 am
Hi David. Thanks for the note. Yes, I know a number of teams that have found Belbin useful for team profiling and development. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Marc D Shapiro PMP LION
8/12/2014 01:57:12 am
I still rely on the venerable Tuckman Model ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuckman's_stages_of_group_development ). While there is more depth to it than "Forming, Storming, Norming, and Performing", I found most current models are derivations of the original. I have also used it with thousands of teams over the past 25 years ... It starts the conversation about team development, and can lead to great insights as the team embraces it and works to understand it.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 05:57:35 am
Hi Marc. Yes, I have also found the Tuckman model helpful, particularly at times to help a team normalise its experience when it is going through Tuckman's 'storming' phase and on the edge of feeling panic! Would you be willing to share any experiences from your own practice? With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Linda J. Ferguson
8/12/2014 01:58:23 am
I was trained by DJ Mitch in the Team Advantage program. It's pretty good.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 05:58:13 am
Hi Linda and thanks for the note. Would you be willing to to share some insights from the Team Advantage programme? With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Sarah A. Scala MEd &OD
8/12/2014 09:01:50 am
Hello Nick. I am an organization development consultant and recently provided a team intervention to a group of 20 people. I used some parts of the Cape Cod Model (from GISC) by having the clients share the team's well developed first in partners then in a large group. This data was used later that day as we worked to define the group's agreed-upon norms.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 05:59:30 am
Hi Sarah and thanks for your note. I would be very interested to hear more about the team intervention you made and how you used aspects of the Cape Cod Model (which I haven't heard of before). With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Philip Merry
10/12/2014 01:35:47 am
GOOD TEAM COACHING SHOULD BE ECLECTIC AND USE MANY MODELS - thoughts from 35 years of team building in 57 countries.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 06:01:40 am
Hi Philip and thanks for sharing such an array of examples. Could you say a bit more about what numbers 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10 look like in practice? I'd be very interested to hear more. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Stephanie Burgetz
10/12/2014 01:36:47 am
Depends on the team, their needs, and the objectives - but my typical 'go to's' are still Tuckman's; Six Habits of Highly Effective Teams (Kohn and O'Connell), and Lencioni's Five Dysfunctions. I most typically start with Tuckman's and then integrate discussions, activities, and reflections and may introduce other models depending on where the team is at and where they need to go.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 06:03:02 am
Hi Stephanie. I agree that flexibilty according to team needs etc. is very important. I would be very interested to hear more about some of the activities you have used and what happened as a result. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Susan Morris
11/12/2014 01:59:56 am
Here's another approach. When I am coaching a new team leader, I use both Tuckman's model as well as Situational Leadership. Combining both models. helps the team leader to identify what stage of development as well as what leadership skills relate to that team development stage. I have found that using both models expands the team leader's repertoire of leadership skills. She can also easily teach these models to her team and get their input as to identify what development stage they see themselves and what leadership behaviors the team would find effective. I have also found that team leaders are not always in sync with how the team sees its development stage, creating an opportunity for a facilitated team conversation.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 06:05:17 am
Hi Susan and thanks for posting such helpful insights. I like Situational Leadership too and find it can open interesting conversations within a team, especially how the leaders and others might place themselves and one-another on the graph. I would be very interested to hear more about any examples of how you have applied this or other models in your own practice. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Henry Tarbi SPHR
11/12/2014 02:04:03 am
While I don't like the negatively worded "Five Disfunctions of a Team" by Lencioni, I find it has a universality to it and generally it gets the client group's attention.
Reply
Gordon Curphy PhD
11/12/2014 02:05:17 am
People forget the subtitle to Lencioni's book: A Leadership Fable. I don't like the Five Dysfunctions because there is zero research to back it up and takes far to long to talk about results, which is why we have teams in the first place.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 06:06:09 am
Hi Henry. Yes, it is definitely a popular model with a number of leaders and coaches I have worked with. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Chris Smith
11/12/2014 02:06:22 am
I always hold Peter Hawkins 5 Cs Team model in mind because it focuses on what the team is there to do and who it serves rather than simply the internal dynamics. What happens in the team is often strongly influenced by what happens for those around the team. The 5 elements are Commissioning (what do stakeholders want from the team); Clarifying (what the team sets as goals and targets); Co-creating (the internal dynamics of how the team works together); Collaborating (how they work with their key stakeholders) and finally Core Learning (how they continue to reflect and raise their performance).
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 06:08:40 am
Hi Chris and thanks for sharing Peter Hawkins' 5C model. He has an interesting write up of it in his book 'Leadership Team Coaching' (2014). I would be very interested to hear of any examples you would be willing to share of how you have applied this model with teams and what happened as a result. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Mark Hollern
13/12/2014 08:42:24 am
Hi, Nick, I'd like to articulate what I consider a difference between coaching and group work. I think of coaching as an individual level of system intervention, while working with a team as a unit (could be as small as a dyad that is interacting, but not just any pair of people in a larger group) as a group level intervention. Most of the models mentioned--and you did ask for models--are macro level, meta- models whose creators don't really give users the tools or help them develop skills to observe phenomenology (real time behavior) to intervene in real time to create awareness of habitual patterns in individuals/the group and to help them experiment with alternatives as a means of achieving different results. I discovered a lens through which all of the team models and all of the large group intervention models could be viewed and interpreted for their efficacy, and that is the Gestalt approach, based on that branch of behavioral science and adapted for organizations/human systems. A good primer on the coaching side I'd recommend is Jennifer Mackewn's, Developing Gestalt Counseling (think coaching client not therapy client when reading) and Edwin Nevis' Organizational Consulting, in which he uses case studies to link the theory to his interventions.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 06:16:24 am
Hi Mark and thanks for sharing such thoughtful reflections. I've been thinking too about distinctions between, say, team coaching and group facilitation.
Reply
Curt Swenson PHR
13/12/2014 08:43:52 am
Nick,
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 06:18:13 am
Hi Curt and thanks for sharing such a great list of reference materials. Would you be willing to draw out one or two examples of techniques that you have found to be particularly effective and to share how you used them in practice? I would be very interested to hear more. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Bart Allen Berry
13/12/2014 08:45:00 am
We have our own 50 question Teamwork Survey For Work Groups - What I love about it i that when it is administered anonymously we really get the issues and problems identified and then it creates expectations that these issues will be addressed - and takes the discomfort out of bringing up these topics for team members. Then we can be the objective facilitators but really advocates for the work group to get what they are really saying they want and need.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 06:20:04 am
Hi Bart and thanks for the note. I would be very interested to see a copy of your Teamwork Survey for Work Groups! With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Gerry Gibson
13/12/2014 08:45:51 am
Price Pritchett has some great, practical (easy for the "man on the street" to comprehend) Team Development ideas and principles in his "Handbooks for Managers."
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 06:21:18 am
Hi Gerry and thanks for the helpful reference to Pritchett's book. Would you be willing to share any examples of ideas or principles you have used from the book, how you applied them and what happened? With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Gene Tange
13/12/2014 08:46:41 am
One of the challenges I have found with many of the models mentioned is they seek to improve "teamness" but do nothing to predict the outcomes of teams. Why is this important? If you have a mission critical initiative knowing you have a team that can achieve the goal 12 months down the road today is the starting point and not a model of team building.
Reply
Gordon Curphy PhD
16/12/2014 03:07:02 am
Gene Tange makes a critical point that has been overlooked by just about everyone responding to this discussion: The purpose of a team or group is to get better results. Many assume that just getting people to know each other better will improve team performance, but this is simply not true. There are plenty of teams made up of happy campers who get little accomplished.
Reply
Carter McNamara MBA PhD
16/12/2014 03:08:54 am
Gordy wrote,,
Gordon Curphy PhD
16/12/2014 03:10:08 am
My bad Carter--you were the first one to respond to this discussion and got it right.
Carter McNamara MBA PhD
16/12/2014 03:12:54 am
Gordy,
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 06:35:28 am
Hi Gordon (and others!). You raise an important point concerning results. It's the same reason why I placed 'vision' or 'goal' at the heart of the model I've outlined in this blog. I agree with Carter that relationships are necessary but not sufficient.
Richard Marks
13/12/2014 08:47:20 am
Organization Relationship Systems Coaching (ORSC) from CRR Global is an integrative (systems) approach to increase team positivity and performance.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 06:36:54 am
Hi Richard and thanks for the note. Could you say a bit more about ORSC and what it looks like in practice? I'm intrigued! With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Janera Soerel
13/12/2014 08:48:28 am
the GROW model, developed by Sir John Whitmore. It works every time! His company, Performance Consultants International, has developed the program Coaching for Performance around the model. For those of you who are interested, the Level 1 course is being offered in NY on Feb 2 & 3, 2015 http://performanceconsultants.com/coach-training-certification-individuals
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 06:39:28 am
Hi Janera and thanks for your comments. The GROW model is certainly very popular in some managerial coaching circles I've worked in, especially when working with individuals with a specific task in mind. Have you seen GROW applied to team coaching too? I would be interested to hear more about any experiences you have had in this area. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Anne Rarich
13/12/2014 08:49:33 am
I like all the ideas that have been put forward and just want to add that there is now a great assessment that can be used with the Lencioni model that combines the self and other perceptions in one tool. If anyone is interested in a sample report to see what your clients would receive from their responses, let me know and I will send you a .pdf sample report.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 06:40:38 am
Hi Anne and thanks for your note. I would be interested to see a sample report based on the Lencioni model. My email address is [email protected]. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Michael R. Perrault
13/12/2014 08:50:48 am
We use the Facet5 personality assessment. Its TeamScape component plots the team's problem solving work cycle, decision making, conflict management (based upon the Thomas Kilman model), and its emotionality factor. The graphic nature of TeamScape seems to make it easier for team's to discuss their effectiveness and challenges. We then have the team prepare a document that maps its strengths, challenges and a way for people to help each be more effective and productive. We build-in a 60 day follow-up that helps with accountability for change.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 07:16:03 am
Hi Michael and thanks for posting such helpful comments. I'm familiar with Kilman's model but haven't heard of the Face5 personality assessment or TeamScape component before. Could you say a bit more about it and, perhaps, how you have used it in practice? I'm very interested. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Gill Kirkman
13/12/2014 08:52:16 am
In coaching sessions (but not a team) I have used John Whitmore's GROW model and also Alan Mackintoshes's extension on the GROW model OUTCOMES (Objectives, Understand reasons, Take stock of situation, Clarify the gap, Options, Motivate into action, Enthusiasm and encouragement, Support) which i really liked. I also intend to have a look at using OSCAR - i suppose it is all relevant to who you are coaching and as you talk of team coaching that can work in different ways. Thanks for sharing your blog and the responses Nick!
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 07:17:44 am
Hi Gill and thanks for your affirming feedback! I'm familiar with GROW but haven't heard of OSCAR before. Can you say a bit more about it? I'd be very interested to hear if you have any examples of applying it to team coaching. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Jean-Luc Dupont
16/12/2014 03:06:01 am
I use the MTRI a model based on Jungian oriented functions (extraverted Sensing,…). It helps describe the roles which are "under-played" or "over-played" in a team.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 07:20:50 am
Hi Jean-Luc. Thanks for the note. I have found MBTI to be an excellent tool for developing team understanding and relationships. I also focus on team values because, for instance, it is possible for team members to understand each other and to use that insight to undermine each other. I haven't heard of MTRI before - can you say more about it? I'd also be interested to hear more abou the graphical representation that you have developed. With thanks and best wishes.
Reply
Terrence H Seamon
16/12/2014 03:07:38 am
Nick, Great discussion you have started. Clearly this topic strikes an important nerve for us ODers,
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 07:24:07 am
Hi Terrence and thanks for your affirming feedback. I like the COACH model that you outline in your blog based on some interesting experiences! Thank you for sharing the link. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Gene Tange
17/12/2014 01:31:38 am
I have read the recent string and I think I can ask some further questions.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 07:25:23 am
Hi Gene. Great questions! What would you propose as the answers to those questions based on your own insights and experience? With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Curt Swenson PHR
17/12/2014 01:32:34 am
Nick- Great conversation you've started - Thank you! The knowledge being shared is certainly valuable. So, is there a "model" that supports both the strategic aspects of driving results AND the human side of changing behavior? Oh, and one more element that hasn't been discussed...Personal Accountability, which in my experience is the one trait that can truly make a difference between success and failure in a team situation. But, maybe that's another discussion...
Reply
Gordon Curphy PhD
17/12/2014 01:33:28 am
Curt, every team needs a sheriff, and accountability is a critical team norm.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 07:28:54 am
Hi Curt and thank you for your contributions that have helped enrich the conversation! I agree with your comment about personal accountability. I often describe is as a key element of 'personal leadership' - an intention, attitude, mindset, commitment and approach that makes all the difference to any team development intervention. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Eda Jedlickova
19/12/2014 07:49:28 am
I work with teams using combination of systemic and gestalt approach - more methodology than model. To name some of them - appreciative inquiry, working with polarities, sculpture of team and other metaphors... I support the idea that it is useful to assist team members in finding connections between each other.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/12/2014 07:51:45 am
Hi Eda and thanks for your comments. I liked the examples of methods that you use and would love to hear more. Do you have any examples of working with teams using these models that you would be happy to share? I always feel excited when I hear about fresh ideas and experiences from the Gestalt field! With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Dr Wafi Al-Baghdadi
2/1/2015 05:28:34 am
Hi Nick. In my opinion, it is very important to listen to the specific words of my client: what is important for her? What are her believes, believe system and convincement (observe the words she uses, like: I believe/I’m convinced that, etc.)? What is her attitude concerning Persons/matters/situations? What are her principles? Waht is right for her? I often write down those important sentences and repeat them with my own words/sentences; these contain her paradigm.
Reply
Nick Wright
2/1/2015 05:34:35 am
Hi Wafi. Thanks for the note and helpful insights. I like your emphasis on listening to the client's language. This fits well with insights from personal construct psychology and social constructionism. It can help reveal how the client sees their world, what they value etc. In order to avoid superimposing my own interpretations onto the client's language, I may invite the client to say more about the meaning behind the words they are using, or if they are willing, to invite them to act out the meaning. This can be very useful in team environments where it helps to reveal differences as well as similarities in assumptions, beliefs, values etc. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Laurie Fitzpatrick ACC
15/6/2015 10:14:55 am
Hi Nick. The Cape Cod Model was developed by Sonia Nevis and others at the Gestalt International Study Center (GISC) on Cape Cod - thus the name. It is taught in several of the programs we offer here in Wellfleet and can be used in both one-on-one coaching and coaching or consulting teams. It's a powerful model that helps individuals and groups expand their range of choices by first focusing on what is "well developed" in the system before moving to work with the "less developed" polarity. More information can be found here: http://www.gisc.org/practitioners/programs/CapeCodTrainingProgram-Practitioners-GestaltInternationalStudyCenter.php
Reply
Nick Wright
15/6/2015 10:17:29 am
Many thanks, Laurie - and for the helpful link. I like the emphasis on focusing first on what is 'well developed' before moving onto what is 'less developed'. It reminds me of a similar ethos in appreciative inquiry, strengths-focused and solutions-focused approaches. With best wishes. Nick
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Nick WrightI'm a psychological coach, trainer and OD consultant. Curious to discover how can I help you? Get in touch! Like what you read? Simply enter your email address below to receive regular blog updates!
|