NICK WRIGHT
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Testimonials
  • Articles
    • Organisations and leadership
    • Learning and development
    • Coaching and counselling
  • Blog
  • e-Resources
  • News
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Testimonials
  • Articles
    • Organisations and leadership
    • Learning and development
    • Coaching and counselling
  • Blog
  • e-Resources
  • News
  • Contact

What lies beneath

18/7/2018

22 Comments

 
Picture

​At a crucial moment in World War 2, Winston Churchill is said to have consulted with two of his key advisors on how to proceed in the face of Nazi Germany’s terrifyingly-effective military advances. One proposed (my paraphrase), “We need to become more organised than the Nazis if we are to defeat them.” The other pushed back in response: “No, the key to victory lays in our unique ability to improvise and, thereby, to take the Nazis by surprise. Organisation is the enemy of improvisation.”

What a dilemma. It’s like Myers Briggs J meets P in stark confrontation. The challenge here was how to face a serious existential threat posed by a highly organised enemy and not only to survive it but also to win: whether to out-organise the organised or to out-wit the organised by doing what they least expect. Yet, in that moment, two people looked at the same data-information, made sense of what they saw in different ways, drew different conclusions and proposed very different solutions.

I see parallels in some of the opportunities and challenges that leaders, OD, coaches and trainers face today. In volatile, uncertain, complex, ambiguous (VUCA) and stressful situations, how often are our observations and decisions - and those of our clients - based subconsciously on (and thereby constrained by) implicit psychological-cultural assumptions and preferences, e.g. for certainty-structure vs fluidity-agility, rather than necessarily on what the situation itself calls for per se?
​
Take, for instance, restructuring and re-engineering projects to solve issues where different types of conversations and relationships could have been less costly and more effective; or formal change management programmes that adhere to strict policies and procedures whereas innovative change leadership could have achieved far better outcomes. This begs important questions: What lies beneath different analyses and ideas for solutions? How can we work with clients to raise them into awareness?
22 Comments
Patrick O'Brien
21/7/2018 11:21:40 am

Support them to learn about and apply high reliability organising (Karl Weick).

It enables ongoing monitoring and assessment, involvement of people who can add value, learning through acting and resilience.

Thanks for your posts Nick! They are really helpful!

Reply
Nick Wright
21/7/2018 11:23:59 am

Hi Patrick - and thank you for your encouraging feedback! I haven't heard of 'high reliability organising' before. Do you have an example of what it could look like in practice?

Reply
Patrick O'Brien
23/7/2018 10:10:58 am

Hey Nick.
My recommendation would be that you read "Managing the Unexpected" by Karl Weick because he gives so many fantastic examples. There are 5 things to attend to when organising for high reliability:
Preoccupation with failure (also referred to as Chronic Unease and Entertaining Doubt - see Dr Robert Long from Human Dymensions).
Sensitivity to Operations
Reluctance to Simplify
Deference to Expertise
Commitment to Resilience
High reliability organising (HROing) is most commonly applied to high risk/critical industries, e.g. nuclear power plants, emergency services, airlines etc. However, all organisations manage risk (and therefore, opportunity and learning) as an essential part of maintaining and optimising operations.
Interestingly, HROing works well with other processes such as continuous improvement. It also, helps with managing the potential issues or unintended consequences of various processes. In the case of continuous improvement, efficiency is the goal. However, HROing helps to guide thinking and planning to keep people with diverse knowledge in the business, so that it can maintain resilience through turbulent or unexpected events.
Have a good one!
Cheers, Pat.

Nick Wright
23/7/2018 10:25:07 am

Hi Pat. Thanks for sharing such fascinating insights. I just read a summary of Weick's book and found it very stimulating. I am used to working with appreciative inquiry (AI) and solutions-focused approaches and the Weick model you have described makes an interesting alternative perspective and approach. It reminds me of 'reflexivity' in research and of critical reflective practice. Thank you for sharing. I will order a copy of 'Managing the Unexpected'!

Patrick Hoverstadt
23/7/2018 10:26:26 am

Hi Nick
Really like this.
I think the answer is it depends. There are issues that require organisations to become much more cohesive to act as one, and there are situations that demand a much more diffuse, agile and flexible approach that maximises autonomy. The trick is understanding what your response should be and that in turn is a strategic question. For me, this is where OCM meets strategy, because the degree of change possible does limit the strategic options available to the organisation and if you've got a coherent strategy (very rare!) then that will tell you exactly what needs to change and how fast.
If you have an interest in the strategy side, then you might like: https://youtu.be/b0DHjO8MhTg

Reply
Nick Wright
23/7/2018 11:33:26 am

Thanks Patrick - and thank you for sharing the link. I found your strategy presentation fascinating. I think the coupling-dynamics idea is a great application of systems theory. I also liked the notion of 'not necessarily conscious'. My sense is that many of the influences and dynamics we experience, often out of awareness, lay outside of our ability to know or understand - let alone manage. This is where I believe fields such as social psychodynamics, complexity theory and social constructionism add very useful contributions to the conversation.

Reply
Jane Miller
23/7/2018 04:18:17 pm

Interesting. Know thyself. Have them answer Napoleon Hills Self Analysis questions. There will be ALOT of awareness from the answers. I tucked them on my site here: http://www.janemillerassociates.com/2018/07/18/napoleon-hills-personal-analysis-test/

Reply
Nick Wright
23/7/2018 04:18:41 pm

Thanks Jane. 'Know thyself' is an important factor - and thanks for sharing the link. Interesting reading. Perhaps there are other factors too, e.g. 'Know others' and 'Know thy situation'?

Reply
Dennis Hooper
24/7/2018 02:42:35 pm

Nothing gets done without the doing. Good ideas don't yield successful accomplishment--it's the execution of good ideas that contributes to desired outcomes.

In VUCA situations, no one knows the "right" or "best" idea. Consultants look for and suggest what they consider to be "best." The execution of that idea, however, is in the hands of someone who may not have a great deal of personal ownership in the idea, so the tenacity and rigor of the execution may suffer.

Coaches challenge and support their clients, stimulating them to identify and engage with the ideas they deem most right. We all have an inherent desire to make what we think is right come to pass. Coaches create the environment for bringing those ideas to conscious awareness, then helping the client clear away the obstacles to transforming the idea into tangible execution.

The awareness that a coach stimulates for the client is often invaluable--as judged by the client, the coach, and even independent third parties.

Reply
Nick Wright
24/7/2018 02:48:14 pm

Hi Lester. I like how you expressed that: 'In VUCA situations, no one knows the "right" or "best" idea.' In my experience, this can sometimes leave leaders feeling anxious, confused or paralysed. In light of that, the coach may work with the client on, say, personal leadership resilience, dynamic systemic insight and complex decision-making as well as, in some instances, the presenting issue itself.

Reply
Anne Hudson
26/7/2018 10:44:51 am

Great article Nick and what a challenge to those working with clients in highly regulated sectors to be brave and call out those assumptions.

Reply
Nick Wright
26/7/2018 10:58:14 am

Thanks Anne. What an intriguing insight. Do you have any examples from personal experience?

In my experience, it's sometimes difficult to know where in the wider system to intervene to call out assumptions, e.g. where regulatory requirements are being created and enforced or, perhaps, where they are being applied rigorously and unquestioningly without any attention to unintended consequences.

A controversial example currently is that of staff working in agencies and institutions that work with children who are not allowed any physical contact whatsoever with the children in order to avoid any risk of abuse or accusation of abuse. This includes even if the child is physically injured or is clearly distressed.

There appears to be little attention to the wider and longer-term psychological and social consequences of a 'no physical contact' rule and the associated fear and suspicion that physical contact becomes associated with in the minds of children, including as they grow older.

You may find this short related piece interesting? http://www.nick-wright.com/blog/do-no-harm I would love to hear what you think!

Reply
Anne Archer
26/7/2018 11:36:12 am

It would seem uncertainty is a scary and difficult place so leaders get to solution as quickly as possible. That may mean missing a golden moment for a transforming decision.

Thanks for the post - got brains working.

Reply
Nick Wright
26/7/2018 11:41:30 am

Thanks Anne. I think that's very profound. If a leader is able to pause and reflect critically and with awareness on, say, 'What is driving my need for a decision?' or, 'Why am I drawn to decision X rather than to decision Y?', it can sometimes open up opportunity for more radical and transformational ideas and options to emerge.

Reply
John Gray
27/7/2018 10:43:55 am

I remember discussions around the 2016 referendum - reactions to the binary / limiting nature of the choice; and how often society or organisational decision-making pushes us into the binary.

Something I have taken from new science is the concept of "both-and". Things don't necessarily have to be either-or, and sometimes both can co-exist. Light, famously, can be a particle and a wave. Leadership today often means having to work effectively amidst paradox or contradiction - or as pointed out above, within the Uncertainty or Ambiguity of VUCA.

So, organise or improvise?; what if both might be possible? It's great as coaches we have the chance to ask 'And what other options might there be?', and to hold out the possibility there may be other paths additional to this or that, on or off, stop or continue, do or don't do.

Reply
Nick Wright
27/7/2018 10:53:38 am

Hi John - and well said! In cognitive psychology, binary thinking is often an indicator that a leader is under stress. It's as if there are absolutely only two options available - usually polar opposites, e.g. 'Do or die'. You may find this short related piece interesting? http://www.nick-wright.com/fresh-thinking.html

If I notice this happening when coaching a leader, I may work with them to explore the polarity as a spectrum - to see what options emerge between the poles - or as a triangle with the X and Y polarities at two points, to see what radical alternative could be represented by 'Z' at the third point.

Interestingly, I once discussed the Churchill dilemma with a social worker in Germany who argued that a level of organisation is necessary for improvisation, based on the psychological notion of a 'secure base' (John Bowlby) from which to explore, experiment and innovate.

Reply
Jeanne Schulze
27/7/2018 10:54:47 am

Excellent thoughts. And, the kid on the right looks exactly like my son Isaac. Really. It could be him.

Reply
Nick Wright
27/7/2018 10:55:32 am

Thanks Jeanne. Have you considered the possibility that Isaac may have taken up a modelling career as a sideline..? :)

Reply
David Adams
29/7/2018 09:40:38 am

We come to conclusions often based on gut feel tempered by our own patterns and those we have seen in others. We then rationalise. This why using de Bono’s 6 thinking hats is so powerful in making the best (not wrong or right) decisions.

Reply
Nick Wright
29/7/2018 09:42:14 am

Hi David. That is certainly consistent with some findings by Prof Eugene Sandler-Smith on leadership decision making. On that theme, you may find this related short piece interesting? http://www.nick-wright.com/blog/intuition

Reply
Ann Ryder
30/7/2018 10:24:19 am

Excellent article, Nick - and it's not just about 'structure Vs innovation' IMO, I think it's also a case of "monkey speak - monkey do"....many change initiatives wax lyrical about the radical (and not so radical) changes that they are advocating - but seem to stall once you take them down the consequences path.

Reply
Nick Wright
30/7/2018 10:25:49 am

Thanks Ann. Are you saying that 'action vs inaction' is another form of polarity that leaders may face in decision-making?

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    ​Nick Wright

    ​I'm a psychological coach, trainer and OD consultant. Curious to discover how can I help you? ​Get in touch!

    Picture
    Like what you read? Simply enter your email address below to receive regular blog updates!
    Subscribe to Blog
    Picture
    Picture


    ​Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011

    Categories

    All
    Abc
    Ability
    Accountability
    Achievement
    Act
    Action
    Action Learning
    Activism
    Adaptability
    Adaptive
    Advent
    Adventure
    Africa
    Agency
    Agile
    Ambiguity
    Angle
    Anticipation
    Anxiety
    Appraisal
    Appreciation
    Appreciative
    Appreciative Inquiry
    Approach
    Argyris
    Asia
    Assumption
    Assumptions
    Asylum
    Attachment
    Attention
    Attitude
    Audience
    Authenticity
    Authority
    Autonomy
    Avoidance
    Awareness
    Behaviour
    Being
    Belief
    Beliefs
    Bias
    Bible
    Body Language
    Boundaries
    Brainstorming
    Brand
    Calling
    Care
    Career
    Censorship
    Challenge
    Change
    Character
    Charity
    Child
    Choice
    Choose
    Christ
    Christian
    Christmas
    Clarity
    Client
    Climate
    Coach
    Coaching
    Coactive
    Cognition
    Cognitive
    Cognitive Behavioural
    Commitment
    Communication
    Community
    Compassion
    Competence
    Competencies
    Complexity
    Concepts
    Conflict
    Confluence
    Congruence
    Consciousness
    Construct
    Constructs
    Construe
    Consultancy
    Contact
    Content
    Context
    Contracting
    Contribution
    Control
    Conversation
    Corruption
    Counselling
    Counterintiution
    Counterintuition
    Countertransference
    Courage
    Craziness
    Creativity
    Credibility
    Crisis
    Critical Consciousness
    Critical Reflection
    Critical Reflective Practice
    Critical Reflexivity
    Critical Thinking
    Critique
    Cross
    Cross Culture
    Cross-culture
    Culture
    Curiosity
    Customer Care
    Customers
    Customer Service
    Death
    Deception
    Decision
    Deconstruction
    Defence
    Defences
    Deferred Gratification
    Definition
    Delusion
    Democracy
    Depression
    Determination
    Development
    Deviance
    Deviant
    Diagnosis
    Disaster
    Discernment
    Disclosure
    Discovery
    Discrimination
    Disruptive
    Dissent
    Dissident
    Dissonance
    Distinctiveness
    Distortion
    Diversity
    Dream
    Dynamic
    Dynamics
    Easter
    Ecology
    Edge
    Edi
    Education
    Effectiveness
    Efficiency
    Ego State
    Eliciting
    Emergence
    Emotion
    Emotional
    Emotional Intelligence
    Empathy
    Empowerment
    Encouragement
    Energy
    Engagement
    Environment
    Equality
    Eternity
    Ethics
    Ethiopia
    Evaluation
    Evidence
    Evocative
    Existential
    Existentialism
    Expectation
    Expectations
    Experience
    Experiment
    Experimentation
    Exploration
    Explore
    Exposure
    Facilitation
    Faith
    Fear
    Feedback
    Feeling
    Feminism
    Figure
    Filter
    Fit
    Flashback
    Focus
    Forgiveness
    Framework
    Freedom
    Freud
    Fun
    Future
    Gender
    Geopolitical
    Geopolitics
    Gestalt
    Global
    Goal
    Goals
    God
    Gospel
    Grace
    Grief
    Grit
    Ground
    Group
    Guidance
    Healing
    Health
    Hear
    Heidegger
    Hero
    Hope
    Human
    Human Givens
    Humanity
    Human Resources
    Human Rights
    Humility
    Humour
    Hybrid
    Hypotheses
    Hypothesis
    Icon
    Ideation
    Identity
    Image
    Imagination
    Impact
    Impostor
    Inclusion
    Independence
    Influence
    INGO
    Initiative
    Injustice
    Innovation
    Inquiry
    Insecurity
    Insight
    Inspiration
    Instinct
    Integrity
    Intention
    Interdependence
    Interference
    International
    Interpretation
    Intimacy
    Introversion
    Intuition
    Invisible
    Jargon
    Jesus
    Journey
    Jungle
    Justice
    Keys
    Knowing
    Knowledge
    Labels
    Language
    Lateral Thinking
    Leader
    Leadership
    Learner
    Learning
    Lesson
    Liberal
    Life
    Light
    Listening
    Logic
    Loss
    Love
    Management
    Manager
    Marathon
    Matrix
    Mbti
    Meaning
    Media
    Mediation
    Meetings
    Memory
    Mentoring
    Merit
    Metaphor
    Metaphysic
    Mindfulness
    Miracle
    Mirroring
    Misfit
    Mission
    Mode
    Morality
    Motivation
    Mystery
    Narrative
    Nazis
    Need
    Negotiation
    Neo-Nazi
    Networking
    News
    New Year
    Norm
    Norms
    Noticing
    Online
    Operations
    Opportunity
    Oppression
    Organisation
    Organisation Develoment
    Organisation Development
    Origin
    Pace
    Panic
    Paradigm
    Paradox
    Partnership
    Passion
    Pastoral
    Pattern Matching
    Peace
    People
    Perception
    Perfectionism
    Performance
    Perseverance
    Personal Constructs
    Personal Leadership
    Person Centred
    Perspective
    Phenomenology
    Phenomenon
    Philippines
    Philosophy
    Physicality
    Plan
    Plans
    Plato
    Play
    Plot
    Polarity
    Policy
    Politics
    Poor
    Positive
    Positive Psychology
    Posture
    Potential
    Potential#
    Poverty
    Power
    Practice
    Pragmatism
    Praxis
    Prayer
    Preference
    Preferences
    Prepare
    Presence
    Principles
    Priorities
    Priority
    Privilege
    Proactivity
    Problem Solving
    Process
    Professional
    Progressive
    Projection
    Projects
    Prompt
    Propaganda
    Protection
    Protest
    Providence
    Provocative
    Psychoanalysis
    Psychodynamic
    Psychodynamics
    Psychology
    Psychometrics
    Psychotherapy
    Purpose
    Quality
    Questions
    Race
    Radical
    Rational
    Rationale
    Rationalisation
    Rationality
    Reality
    Reason
    Reasoning
    Reconciliation
    Recruitment
    Reflect
    Reflection
    Reflective Practice
    Reflexivity
    Reframing
    Refugee
    Refugees
    Relationship
    Relationships
    Release
    Religion
    Representation
    Rescue
    Research
    Resilience
    Resonance
    Resourcefulness
    Responsibility
    Responsive
    Responsiveness
    Revelation
    Reward
    Rights
    Risk
    Role
    Role Model
    Rosabeth Moss-kanter
    Rules
    Sabbath
    Satire
    Satnav
    Saviour
    Schemata
    School
    Science
    Secure Base
    Security
    See
    Selection
    Selective Attention
    Self
    Sense Making
    Senses
    Sensitivity
    Serendipity
    Servant
    Shadow
    Significance
    Silence
    Sin
    Skills
    Social Construct
    Social Construction
    Social Constructionism
    Social Media
    Social Psychology
    Socrates
    Solution Focused
    Solutions
    Solutions Focus
    Solutions-focus
    Space
    Speed
    Spirit
    Spirituality
    Stance
    Stealth
    Stereotype
    Stereotypes
    Story
    Strategic
    Strategy
    Strengths
    Stress
    Stretch
    Structure
    Struggle
    Stuck
    Style
    Subconscious
    Subjectivity
    Success
    Suffering
    Supervision
    Support
    Survival
    Sustainability
    Symbol
    Symbolism
    Systems
    Systems Thinking
    TA
    Tactical
    Tactics
    Talent
    Teacher
    Teaching
    Team
    Teamwork
    Teenage
    Theology
    Theory
    Therapy
    Thinking
    Thought
    Time
    Touch
    Toys
    Traction
    Trade
    Tradition
    Training
    Transactional Analysis
    Transference
    Transformation
    Transition
    Transitional Object
    Trauma
    Trust
    Truth
    Uncertainty
    Unexpected
    Vallues
    Value
    Values
    Violence
    Visibility
    Vision
    Voice
    VUCA
    Vulnerability
    Vulnerable
    Waiting
    War
    Wealth
    Weird
    Wellbeing
    Will
    Willingness
    Window
    Wisdom
    Wonder
    Words
    World
    Worth
    Youth
    Zoom

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Testimonials
  • Articles
    • Organisations and leadership
    • Learning and development
    • Coaching and counselling
  • Blog
  • e-Resources
  • News
  • Contact