NICK WRIGHT
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Testimonials
  • Articles
    • Organisations and leadership
    • Learning and development
    • Coaching and counselling
  • Blog
  • e-Resources
  • News
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Testimonials
  • Articles
    • Organisations and leadership
    • Learning and development
    • Coaching and counselling
  • Blog
  • e-Resources
  • News
  • Contact

What's your coaching style?

24/4/2014

31 Comments

 
​How would you describe your coaching style? What questions would you bring to a client situation?

In my experience, it depends on a whole range of factors including the client, the relationship, the situation and what beliefs and expertise I, as coach, may hold. It also depends on what frame of reference or approach I and the client believe could be most beneficial. Some coaches are committed to a specific theory, philosophy or approach. Others are more fluid or eclectic.

Take, for instance, a leader in a Christian organisation struggling with issues in her team. The coach could help the leader explore and address the situation drawing on any number of perspectives or methods. Although not mutually exclusive, each has its own focus and emphasis. The content and boundaries will reflect what the client and coach believe may be significant:

Appreciative/solutions-focused: e.g. ‘What would an ideal team look and feel like for you?’, ‘When has this team been at its best?’, ‘What made the greatest positive difference at the time?’, ‘What opportunity does this situation represent?’, ‘On a scale of 1-10, how well is this team meeting your and other team members’ expectations?’, ‘What would it take to move it up a notch?’

Psychodynamic/cognitive-behavioural: e.g. ‘What picture comes to mind when you imagine the team?’, ‘What might a detached observer notice about the team?’, ‘How does this struggle feel for you?’, ‘When have you felt like that in the past?’, ‘What do you do when you feel that way?’, ‘What could your own behaviour be evoking in the team?’, ‘What could you do differently?’

Gestalt/systemic: e.g. ‘What is holding your attention in this situation?’ ‘What are you not noticing?’, ‘What are you inferring from people’s behaviour in the team?’, ‘What underlying needs are team members trying to fulfil by behaving this way?’, ‘What is this team situation telling you about wider issues in the organization?’, ‘What resources could you draw on to support you?’

Spiritual/existential: e.g. ‘How is this situation affecting your sense of calling as a leader?’, ‘What has God taught you in the past that  could help you deal with this situation?’, ‘What resonances do you see between your leadership struggle and that experienced by people in the Bible?’, ‘What ways of dealing with this would feel most congruent with your beliefs and values?’

An important principle I’ve learned is to explore options and to contract with the client. ‘These are some of the ways in which we could approach this issue. What might work best for you?’ This enables the client to retain appropriate choice and control whilst, at the same time, introduces possibilities, opportunities and potential new experiences that could prove transformational.
31 Comments
Deborah Pearson
24/4/2014 04:52:55 pm

Have experienced many of these issues/situations in my capacity as a manager.

Reply
Nick Wright
25/4/2014 10:31:40 am

Hi Deborah and thanks for the note. Having read the blog, did you have a sense of which coaching approach you would find/have found most helpful? With best wishes. Nick

Reply
Jeremy Marchant
26/4/2014 12:59:31 pm

Well, I use coaching as only one of a number of ways I work with a client in any one session, but if I may answer the question, I would say, "self-effacing".

What questions?: "How come?" is my favourite, particularly as in, "how come it suits you that X is happening?" where X is something the client doesn't want to be happening (he/she says).

Reply
Nick Wright
27/4/2014 06:49:33 am

Hi Jeremy and thanks for the intriguing note. Could you say more about what 'self-effacing' would look like from the client's perspective and experience? I liked your comment about 'how come it suits you'. Reminds me of games in Transational Analysis. With best wishes. Nick

Reply
Jeremy Marchant
28/4/2014 02:40:44 am

Nick, good question. I’m not at all sure that I know what “self-effacing” looks like from the client’s perspective.

Many years ago I had a course of psychotherapy in which the therapist took her self-effacement to absurd extremes (albeit wholly in line with psychotherapeutic practices at the time)—well beyond the point where it might have been useful to me. So I hope I am not like that!

I think all good coaches are self-effacing, since pure coaching is surely about subscribing to a belief that the client always has all the resources they need (something, incidentally, which I think is indefensible), so why would the coach feel they need to impose their stuff into the conversation?

I am not a coach, though I use coaching techniques (forgive me for not typing out the rationale yet again in a LinkedIn discussion group; I have put it here: www.emotionalintelligenceatwork.com/resources/emotional-intelligence-work-approach-coaching).

So, it won’t surprise you if I say I do not have one style. That would be intolerable—both for me and for the client—in a coaching programme extending over any period of months, let alone years.

I have a number of styles. One of these is being provocative: as in answering the question about my style by saying I am self-effacing (particularly as I think this is not a provocative remark (as I explained above) but, as predicted, readers seem to!)

To be more serious, self-effacement surely looks like not having an interest in the discussion. In the olden days, the English language distinguished between uninterested and disinterested. A judge in court is disinterested in the outcome, but certainly is not uninterested in the case.

If I say I don’t care what the client does, that might seem shocking but, in truth, why should I be concerned that the client does what _I_ think is right? The client should be doing what _they_ think is right—provided they know why they are doing it.

Eberhard Bohrisch
26/4/2014 01:01:31 pm

I call it system-oriented as far as the functioning of my thoughts and emotions are concerned. My actual acting within an coaching-relationship is client-centered.

Reply
Nick Wright
27/4/2014 06:51:03 am

Hi Eberhard. Would you be happy to say something more about what 'system-oriented' and 'client-centred' would look like in practice? With best wishes. Nick

Reply
Eberhard Bohrisch
27/4/2014 11:25:17 am

Hi Nick, thanks for the question!
Client-centered is the old therapy-concept of Carl Rogers, how deeply influenced me because of is humanistic approach. Client-centered means that the coach is focused on his client emotions, and thoughts. The client and his interests are always leading the process.
System-oriented means that I perceive and interpret not world not in terms of causality but as an open system of subsystems. I'm thinking in networks a level of perception. The consequence is that I have to deal with the problem that I have to process more information as is consciously possible (7 ± 2). That can only be done by a high degree of mindfulness and awareness and with trust in the ability of my whole brain (not only the working memory) to make adequate proposals and on the clients' personality to select what is useful for her / him. The methodology of my work contains questioning with the goal to focus on complexity (to see always the other possibilities) an e.g. circular questioning or reframing and action-methods as e.g. constellations or time-line.
I know that I would have to extend. But I would like to leave it like this.
Greetings!
Eberhard

Jeremy Marchant
1/5/2014 04:06:24 am

Nice to hear of another coach influenced by Carl Rogers, Eberhard. It is extraordinary that not all coaches are "client-centred" but apparently so. I am also strongly influenced by DW Winnicott.

Coming from a background of IT systems analysis, I am also influenced by this experience - it serves me well as a practitioner whether I am coaching or doing something else. However, I do not see the need to embrace all possible complexity - on the contrary, it is about keeping it simple.

Where I differ from Bernhard is that I don't call myself a coach; I am not one. I apply many other techniques if I feel the client might find them useful. One of these is to teach my clients models. I have invariably found that these enable them to gain insight into what’s going on for them. This in turn facilitates the shifts they need to make.

Rev. Dr. Constance Cook-Core
26/4/2014 01:02:17 pm

Empowerment.

Reply
Nick Wright
27/4/2014 06:52:17 am

Hi Constance. Empowerment strikes me as an important goal in coaching. Would you be willing to say more about what approach you use to enable it? With best wishes. Nick

Reply
Ashiya Hudson
26/4/2014 01:03:00 pm

I have a direct style of coaching. I use plenty of affirmations to boost confidence and build trust, but I strongly believe in addressing issues both directly and honestly.

Reply
Nick Wright
27/4/2014 06:55:42 am

Hi Ashiya and thanks for the note. I agree with you that it's easier (or more acceptable to the client) to be direct when the relationship is built on trust and that, sometimes, being direct and honest can build trust too. It sounds like authenticity is an important value to you. Would you be willing to share some examples of what your 'direct and honest' coaching style looks like in practice? With best wishes. Nick

Reply
DR. VERNA JACKMAN-BISHOP
27/4/2014 07:21:22 am

Interesting.....

Reply
Nick Wright
27/4/2014 07:23:06 am

Hi Verna. Could you say a little more about 'interesting...'? I'm interested to hear more! With best wishes. Nick

Reply
Luis A. Marrero
27/4/2014 07:22:13 am

Thanks for your sharing your post, Nick. My short answer is that my coaching style is what the client needs. Though a logoteleologist, I am fortunate to have experience and knowledge of various approaches. I am client-centric and will select the method most appropriate for her or his situation. The goal and context will help determine that.

Reply
Nick Wright
27/4/2014 07:24:27 am

Hi Luis. Many thanks for the note. I've never heard of logoteleology before. Could you say a bit more about what it means and looks like in practice, perhaps with some examples from your experience? With best wishes. Nick

Reply
Luis A. Marrero
27/4/2014 11:34:24 am

Greetings from Massachusetts, Nick. A pleasure to meet and to LinkedIn with you.

Logoteleology is a branch of Viktor Frankl's logotherapy. Logoteleology is meaningful purpose psychology. You can read about it in my book, "The Path to a Meaningful Purpose: Psychological Foundations of Logoteleology" (www.logotelos.com) and in my blog: http://authorluismarrero.wordpress.com/

My web page is www.bostonimp.com

Logoteleology is the scientific study of the meanings that enable individuals and communities to thrive.It comes from three Greek words:

1. Logos - meaning

2. Thelos - will (motivation)

3. Telos - purpose or ends

The raison d'être of logoteleology is to deal with an existential problem: "Mankind does not suffer from a lack of answers. Rather, it suffers despite the answers being available."

I research, publish, and aid people and organizations to deal with such paradox. I do so by analyzing meaning DNA's and their influence on motivation and purpose. To explain it briefly, I have stated that "What you mean, masters you."

I am sought by clients who want meaningful purpose psychology methods to better understand why they get the results they get, and how to improve. I use interviews and psychometrics to aid in meaning analysis. When clients understand the meaning they give to themselves, others, and situations -- and their implications and impact -- they are in a better position to select better options. Those inclined to do therapy practice logoteleotherapy (or the short version teleotherapy) which means "healing through meaningful purpose".

I and other certified and licensed logoteleologists also facilitate meaningful purpose laboratories, and do OD work.

There is more to meaningful purpose psychology; but this, I hope, is a sufficient explanation of some of its fundamentals.

Nick Wright
27/4/2014 11:57:36 am

Hi Luis. Greetings from the UK. Thank you for such a helpful and inspiring response. I will certainly subscribe to your blog. The existential perspective you refer to resonates deeply with my own personal experience. I'm reading a book called, 'Existential Perspectives on Coaching' by van Duerzen and Hanaway (2012) at the moment - have you come across it? With thanks again and very best wishes. Nick

Luis A. Marrero
28/4/2014 02:37:28 am

Hello Nick. I will take a look at the book you suggest in Amazon (I am currently writing the second book in the logoteleology anthology). Thanks for sharing.

Happy to find professionals who care for the meaningful. Once you become familiar with meaningful purpose psychology, let me know if you wish to collaborate. We (Boston Institute for Meaningful Purpose) currently have initiatives to expand globally, and we welcome exploring synergy with like-minded partners.

Again, thanks, and well wishes. Luis

Doug Wilson
27/4/2014 11:27:06 am

Coaching styles shoud be related to the needs of the particpant and their level of maturity in the issue.
Asking socratic question of a person who has no content knowledge makes no more sense than lecturing an experienced person who just needs to determine how to apply what they know to a given situation.

Reply
Nick Wright
27/4/2014 11:30:49 am

Hi Doug and thanks for your response. I like your comment about the level of client maturity in an issue. I've found in my own experience that new middle managers, for instance, often benefit most from mentoring that helps them build up their knowledge and ideas base whereas experienced senior leaders often benefit most from a more non-directive reflective approach that processes their wider experience. With best wishes. Nick

Reply
John Panigas
28/4/2014 07:10:50 am

That's an interesting comment Doug. Level of "maturity" can mean many things. It's my experience that maturity is multi-layered in a business owner. I have had the most success with being very interested in past behaviours and how decisions are made by the client. Looking for patterns of behaviours makes the relationship richer and we are able to get to core issues quicker and more efficiently.

Reply
George Anderson, MSW, BCD, CEAP
28/4/2014 02:39:12 am

Nick,
Thanks for your question. I often find this type of comment puzzling.

Reply
John Panigas
28/4/2014 07:11:32 am

Hey Nick, Great post!
I believe that as a coach being inquisitive is important. Without becoming a pain I spend a lot of time on asking why? This has led to great exchanges with clients and ultimately to great epiphanies.

Reply
Sharman Jeffries link
30/4/2014 08:50:53 am

What a great discussion flow! i would describe my working style with clients as solution focused, creative and psycho educational, using a range of methods depending on the client, their needs and goals.

Reply
Jennifer David
19/5/2014 03:41:47 am

Hi all, I tend to be client centred, I find that it empowers the client.

Reply
Yepi link
16/7/2014 01:58:05 am

What a great initiative here. I'll look around the site and see if I can offer any additional ideas. Thanks.

Reply
minecraft 8 link
4/8/2014 02:28:03 am

Thanks for this informative post. It help me a lot. And it gave mo ideas on how to make more money in marketing business. I hope lots of people visit this site so they can easily learn this informative post.

Reply
Michael Craig
11/8/2014 07:35:15 am

Thanks for asking Nick. I start off with myself - my own perceptions are key to the process, and how I see the client. Using an approach I can only describe as "Divine Listening," I simply accept that the person in front of me is a Divine Being who knows - deep down - everything he or she needs to know to solve the problem or complete the situation. Then I use a simple feedback method in Discovery to take statements the client says and test them - to see whether or not their inner and outer decision-makers are in sync . . . or "congruent" with their desired outcome. The third phase is to test whether or not they even have Access to their inner decision-maker (and if not, get that), and finally I take them through a Resolution phase,or simple visualization that helps them integrate the new decision into their mind and body. The whole thing is remarkably effective, since its based on the nature of the mind itself.

Reply
Cheryl White
11/8/2014 07:35:45 am

Aahh, great question. Until now I really had not thought about my coaching style, especially since I have "Bambi legs" right now. I would say that my style is client focused. I allow the client to determine where we go on a call. I get their request and ask how they want to spend their time and allow them to speak. Then use reflection and powerful questioning as the access point to the client's awareness. As Michael said, the clients already have everything they need to solve their problems, I (we) get to help them to see the possibilities in choice. What I have found is that allowing the client to "drive" they are able to generate practices that support their transformation and goal achievement. The practice areas give the client the chance to choose a different way of being or doing things to move them forward.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    ​Nick Wright

    ​I'm a psychological coach, trainer and OD consultant. Curious to discover how can I help you? ​Get in touch!

    Picture
    Like what you read? Simply enter your email address below to receive regular blog updates!
    Subscribe to Blog
    Picture
    Picture


    ​Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011

    Categories

    All
    Abc
    Ability
    Accountability
    Achievement
    Act
    Action
    Action Learning
    Activism
    Adaptability
    Adaptive
    Advent
    Adventure
    Africa
    Agency
    Agile
    Ambiguity
    Angle
    Anticipation
    Anxiety
    Appraisal
    Appreciation
    Appreciative
    Appreciative Inquiry
    Approach
    Argyris
    Asia
    Assumption
    Assumptions
    Asylum
    Attachment
    Attention
    Attitude
    Audience
    Authenticity
    Authority
    Autonomy
    Avoidance
    Awareness
    Behaviour
    Being
    Belief
    Beliefs
    Bias
    Bible
    Body Language
    Boundaries
    Brainstorming
    Brand
    Calling
    Care
    Career
    Censorship
    Challenge
    Change
    Character
    Charity
    Child
    Choice
    Choose
    Christ
    Christian
    Christmas
    Clarity
    Client
    Climate
    Coach
    Coaching
    Coactive
    Cognition
    Cognitive
    Cognitive Behavioural
    Commitment
    Communication
    Community
    Compassion
    Competence
    Competencies
    Complexity
    Concepts
    Conflict
    Confluence
    Congruence
    Consciousness
    Construct
    Constructs
    Construe
    Consultancy
    Contact
    Content
    Context
    Contracting
    Contribution
    Control
    Conversation
    Corruption
    Counselling
    Counterintiution
    Counterintuition
    Countertransference
    Courage
    Craziness
    Creativity
    Credibility
    Crisis
    Critical Consciousness
    Critical Reflection
    Critical Reflective Practice
    Critical Reflexivity
    Critical Thinking
    Critique
    Cross
    Cross Culture
    Cross-culture
    Culture
    Curiosity
    Customer Care
    Customers
    Customer Service
    Death
    Deception
    Decision
    Deconstruction
    Defence
    Defences
    Deferred Gratification
    Definition
    Delusion
    Democracy
    Depression
    Determination
    Development
    Deviance
    Deviant
    Diagnosis
    Disaster
    Discernment
    Disclosure
    Discovery
    Discrimination
    Disruptive
    Dissent
    Dissident
    Dissonance
    Distinctiveness
    Distortion
    Diversity
    Dream
    Dynamic
    Dynamics
    Easter
    Ecology
    Edge
    Edi
    Education
    Effectiveness
    Efficiency
    Ego State
    Eliciting
    Emergence
    Emotion
    Emotional
    Emotional Intelligence
    Empathy
    Empowerment
    Encouragement
    Energy
    Engagement
    Environment
    Equality
    Eternity
    Ethics
    Ethiopia
    Evaluation
    Evidence
    Evocative
    Existential
    Existentialism
    Expectation
    Expectations
    Experience
    Experiment
    Experimentation
    Exploration
    Explore
    Exposure
    Facilitation
    Faith
    Fear
    Feedback
    Feeling
    Feminism
    Figure
    Filter
    Fit
    Flashback
    Focus
    Forgiveness
    Framework
    Freedom
    Freud
    Fun
    Future
    Gender
    Geopolitical
    Geopolitics
    Gestalt
    Global
    Goal
    Goals
    God
    Gospel
    Grace
    Grief
    Grit
    Ground
    Group
    Guidance
    Healing
    Health
    Hear
    Heidegger
    Hero
    Hope
    Human
    Human Givens
    Humanity
    Human Resources
    Human Rights
    Humility
    Humour
    Hybrid
    Hypotheses
    Hypothesis
    Icon
    Ideation
    Identity
    Image
    Imagination
    Impact
    Impostor
    Inclusion
    Independence
    Influence
    INGO
    Initiative
    Injustice
    Innovation
    Inquiry
    Insecurity
    Insight
    Inspiration
    Instinct
    Integrity
    Intention
    Interdependence
    Interference
    International
    Interpretation
    Intimacy
    Introversion
    Intuition
    Invisible
    Jargon
    Jesus
    Journey
    Jungle
    Justice
    Keys
    Knowing
    Knowledge
    Labels
    Language
    Lateral Thinking
    Leader
    Leadership
    Learning
    Lesson
    Liberal
    Life
    Light
    Listening
    Logic
    Loss
    Love
    Management
    Manager
    Marathon
    Matrix
    Mbti
    Meaning
    Media
    Mediation
    Meetings
    Memory
    Mentoring
    Merit
    Metaphor
    Metaphysic
    Mindfulness
    Miracle
    Mirroring
    Misfit
    Mission
    Mode
    Morality
    Motivation
    Mystery
    Narrative
    Nazis
    Need
    Negotiation
    Neo-Nazi
    Networking
    News
    New Year
    Norm
    Norms
    Noticing
    Online
    Operations
    Opportunity
    Oppression
    Organisation
    Organisation Develoment
    Organisation Development
    Origin
    Pace
    Panic
    Paradigm
    Paradox
    Partnership
    Passion
    Pastoral
    Pattern Matching
    Peace
    People
    Perception
    Perfectionism
    Performance
    Perseverance
    Personal Constructs
    Personal Leadership
    Person Centred
    Perspective
    Phenomenology
    Phenomenon
    Philippines
    Philosophy
    Physicality
    Plan
    Plans
    Plato
    Play
    Plot
    Polarity
    Policy
    Politics
    Poor
    Positive
    Positive Psychology
    Posture
    Potential
    Potential#
    Poverty
    Power
    Practice
    Pragmatism
    Praxis
    Prayer
    Preference
    Preferences
    Prepare
    Presence
    Principles
    Priorities
    Priority
    Privilege
    Proactivity
    Problem Solving
    Process
    Professional
    Progressive
    Projection
    Projects
    Prompt
    Propaganda
    Protection
    Protest
    Providence
    Provocative
    Psychoanalysis
    Psychodynamic
    Psychodynamics
    Psychology
    Psychometrics
    Psychotherapy
    Purpose
    Quality
    Questions
    Race
    Radical
    Rational
    Rationale
    Rationalisation
    Rationality
    Reality
    Reason
    Reasoning
    Reconciliation
    Recruitment
    Reflect
    Reflection
    Reflective Practice
    Reflexivity
    Reframing
    Refugee
    Refugees
    Relationship
    Relationships
    Release
    Religion
    Representation
    Rescue
    Research
    Resilience
    Resonance
    Resourcefulness
    Responsibility
    Responsive
    Responsiveness
    Revelation
    Reward
    Rights
    Risk
    Role
    Role Model
    Rosabeth Moss-kanter
    Rules
    Sabbath
    Satire
    Satnav
    Saviour
    Schemata
    School
    Science
    Secure Base
    Security
    See
    Selection
    Selective Attention
    Self
    Sense Making
    Senses
    Sensitivity
    Serendipity
    Servant
    Shadow
    Significance
    Silence
    Sin
    Skills
    Social Construct
    Social Construction
    Social Constructionism
    Social Media
    Social Psychology
    Socrates
    Solution Focused
    Solutions
    Solutions Focus
    Solutions-focus
    Space
    Speed
    Spirit
    Spirituality
    Stance
    Stealth
    Stereotype
    Stereotypes
    Story
    Strategic
    Strategy
    Strengths
    Stress
    Stretch
    Structure
    Struggle
    Stuck
    Style
    Subconscious
    Subjectivity
    Success
    Suffering
    Supervision
    Support
    Survival
    Sustainability
    Symbol
    Symbolism
    Systems
    Systems Thinking
    TA
    Tactical
    Tactics
    Talent
    Teaching
    Team
    Teamwork
    Teenage
    Theology
    Theory
    Therapy
    Thinking
    Thought
    Time
    Touch
    Toys
    Traction
    Trade
    Tradition
    Training
    Transactional Analysis
    Transference
    Transformation
    Transition
    Transitional Object
    Trauma
    Trust
    Truth
    Uncertainty
    Unexpected
    Vallues
    Value
    Values
    Violence
    Visibility
    Vision
    Voice
    VUCA
    Vulnerability
    Vulnerable
    Waiting
    War
    Wealth
    Weird
    Wellbeing
    Will
    Willingness
    Window
    Wisdom
    Wonder
    Words
    World
    Worth
    Youth
    Zoom

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Testimonials
  • Articles
    • Organisations and leadership
    • Learning and development
    • Coaching and counselling
  • Blog
  • e-Resources
  • News
  • Contact