My daughter is a guinea pig. This afternoon in the bright sunshine, I invited her to take part in an experiment. First, we stepped out into the street and, gesturing to a line of cars parked at the roadside, I asked, “If you were to buy a car, what colour would you choose, or definitely not choose?” She answered, “I’d love a white car.” “OK,” I replied, “let’s go for a walk into town and back. Your task is to count every white car that we pass. If you have the same number as me when we get back here, I will give you £10. How does that sound?” She grinned and willingly agreed.
An hour later, we stopped back where we had started and I asked her, “So, how many red cars did you see?” She looked at me blankly. “I didn’t see any red cars. I counted 206 white cars.” In fact, we had passed 93 red cars, yet she had been so focused on the white cars that she hadn’t seen a single one. This simple experiment illustrates an important psychological phenomenon known as selective attention: “The ability to pay attention to a limited array of all available sensory information…a filter that helps us prioritize information according to its importance.” (Bertram Ploog, 2013). Gestalt psychotherapist Geoff Pelham comments that, in any given relationship or situation, we notice who or what matters most to us (The Coaching Relationship in Practice, 2015). This idea of who or what matters most reflects beliefs, values and emotions. In this exercise, my daughter was influenced and motivated by her beliefs (that this experiment would serve some useful purpose), values (the prospect of a £10 reward) and emotion (her choice of a colour she likes). These factors combined to ensure concentration on a task (counting white cars) that required selective attention. Why is this insight significant in our work with people? The principle extends beyond literal-visual perception to deeper psychological processes too. Our beliefs, values and emotions subconsciously influence our focus and act as filters. We construe personal-shared narratives based on what we perceive. Such narratives appear to us as-if reality, as-if totality, and often without any awareness of who or what we have excluded. As such, narratives always point to and reveal, implicitly, who and what matters most to a person, group or culture, rather than to a definitive account of reality per se. A key question is, therefore: who or what are we, and others, not-noticing? If we can enable a shift in perception, a re-shaping of a narrative, what then becomes possible? Interested to do further reading in this area? See: The Art of Looking: Eleven Ways of Viewing the Multiple Realities of our Everyday Wonderland.
12 Comments
Frank Bolaji Irawo
18/3/2021 08:44:29 am
Love that Nick, that is the RAS Reticular Activating System in play. Filtering in what she was focused on into her conscious experience.
Reply
Nick Wright
18/3/2021 08:45:34 am
Hi Frank - and thank you for such affirming feedback!
Reply
Richard Simpson
19/3/2021 10:12:56 am
Thanks as ever Nick. Shared your experiment with my wife (a retired school teacher) who thought it was cruel on your daughter! I thought it was brilliantly simple and illustrative. Again, I refer to my experience in the British NHS where the system tends to do the thinking that creates the tasks and the frontline workers tend to be reduced to delivery mechanisms. Senior managers bemoaned the fact that staff tended 'to focus on the finger, not where it was pointing' which I think showed a lack of understanding of human nature. Give a human a task, a deadline to complete it and a reward (or punishment), and you've created an attention environment where do-ers are privileged and thinkers are often seen as troublemakers because they say things like 'what about...?' and 'what if...?' Things that potentially disrupt the completion of the task. The old 'Jobsworth' mentality was probably descriptive of people who refused to think outside the narrow guide rails of the task. I also wonder, in a coaching context, whether a focus on 'performance' can exacerbate selective attention in certain situations.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/3/2021 04:27:34 pm
Hi Richard and thank you, as always, for sharing such thoughtful insights. Yes, I did wonder about the ethics of the experiment with my daughter...but she knows her Dad well and she said, afterwards, that she really taking part in it - and appearing in a blog!
Reply
Richard Simpson
19/3/2021 08:30:10 pm
Thanks Nick - glad your daughter found the experiment enjoyable! My wife is still chuntering away about it - haha.
Reply
Nick Wright
19/3/2021 10:44:55 pm
😅
Reply
Simon Laurie
22/3/2021 09:49:13 am
Is this an example of Margaret Heffernan's Willful Blindness and the Invisible Gorilla?
Reply
Nick Wright
22/3/2021 11:35:05 am
Hi Simon. Yes, it is essentially the same psychological phenomenon as Chabris' & Simons' The Invisible Gorilla experiment. Heffernan's Wilful Blindness adds some interesting dimensions around will and choice. There are some resonances here with a couple of short related pieces that you may find interesting?
Reply
Ian Henderson
24/3/2021 09:34:44 am
Hi Nick. Great piece again. Like others, it reminds me of the gorilla/basketball exercise. It also reminds me of the quote by R D Laing who said........are you ready for this...............
Reply
Nick Wright
24/3/2021 10:21:06 am
Hi Ian and thank you, as always, for such encouraging feedback.
Reply
Martin M Brook
24/3/2021 01:46:21 pm
I'm a bit confused. Why would she count red cars if the challenge was to count white cars. Also, just because she didn't know how many red cars had passed, doesn't mean she didn't see red cars...
Reply
Nick Wright
24/3/2021 01:48:39 pm
Hi Martin. It's a selective attention test. In case of interest, here's the most famous experiment of this type: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJG698U2Mvo
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Nick WrightI'm a psychological coach, trainer and OD consultant. Curious to discover how can I help you? Get in touch! Like what you read? Simply enter your email address below to receive regular blog updates!
|